3 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusen	3ffdbbc521	fix(acl): align MCP writes with the share model — editor edits, viewer doesn't ... Option B, per the operator. Closes the last inconsistency from the ACL work. The agent path had drifted into an indefensible position: delete_snippet honoured editor shares (I made it share-aware so widening the read wouldn't let a VIEWER trash things) while update_snippet still resolved through the owner-only notes.get_note. So through an agent you could destroy a colleague's snippet but not improve it — and the refusal claimed "not found" for a record you could plainly open. Now update_snippet, merge_snippets and update_process all resolve the read scope and then require can_write_note, matching the REST routes and the sharing UI's own promise that viewer / editor / admin are distinct grants. A viewer grant is refused with the actual reason ("shared with you read-only — ask its owner for edit access, or record your own version"), because not-found would send an agent hunting for a missing id instead of recording its own copy. Authorised writes are performed as the OWNER, since the underlying note update is owner-scoped and a shared editor's own id would match nothing. Merge additionally requires each source to share the TARGET'S owner and to be writable by the caller — merging trashes the source, so read access isn't enough, and cross-owner merge stays out of scope (#231). Sources failing either test are skipped rather than half-merged. A record the caller cannot read at all still returns not-found rather than forbidden, so the error can't be used to confirm that an id exists. Also fixed _fake_snippet's missing user_id proactively — the same auto-MagicMock-reads-as-foreign trap that broke CI twice (see note 2109). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RLwAaV4DQEmVyn496HnEvt	2026-07-26 00:04:48 -04:00
bvandeusen	04b58ce01e	feat(acl): shared records are search-only and always labelled as someone else's ... Narrows the b7d6fc7 widening per the operator's call, and fixes a regression it introduced. Decision recorded as note 2094. Two scopes now, deliberately different: readable_notes_clause — everything the ACL permits, including records reached only via a direct/group note share. For EXPLICIT acts: a search the caller typed, a fetch by id. browsable_notes_clause — the caller's own records plus anything in a project they can reach. For PASSIVE surfaces: browse lists, facet counts, the process->skill manifest. The split is a trust boundary. Anything appearing unasked — in your own list, your own counts, or as a skill installed on your machine — reads as material you endorsed. A one-off someone shared with you hasn't earned that standing, so it waits until you go looking. This also dissolves the shared-Process problem by construction rather than by special case: the manifest is a passive surface, so a directly-shared Process is never installed as an auto-surfacing skill. Regression fix (#2093): b7d6fc7 widened the list queries but left the fetch path owner-only, so on the MCP path a record could be listed and then not opened — get_snippet raised not-found, get_process couldn't resolve, and the manifest emitted stubs whose get_process call would fail. snippets.get_snippet and notes.resolve_process now resolve the read scope. delete_snippet gained an explicit can_write_note guard, since being able to SEE a shared snippet must not imply being able to bin it. Provenance, so nothing arrives looking like the operator's own work: - access.describe_provenance / label_shared_items add shared/owner/permission; labelling costs no query when everything is the caller's own. - MCP: get_snippet, list_snippets, get_process and list_processes carry it, and get_process now says outright NOT to follow a shared process verbatim — its follow-as-written contract was the sharpest instance of the problem. - The skill stub for a shared Process names its author and asks for a go-ahead, instead of describing it as "the operator's saved Scribe process". - Policy stated once in the MCP _INSTRUCTIONS and the reusing-code skill: a shared record is that person's suggestion, weigh it, attribute it, ask before adopting it. - UI: shared snippets show "by <owner>" in the list and a notice above the code in the detail view, reusing SharedWithMeView's vocabulary. Plugin 0.1.15 -> 0.1.16 (skill text changed). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RLwAaV4DQEmVyn496HnEvt	2026-07-25 22:43:00 -04:00
bvandeusen	b255a0f90e	refactor: rename package fabledassistant -> scribe (code-only) ... Renames src/fabledassistant -> src/scribe and all imports, plus the default DB name and DB user/password (fabled -> scribe) in config + compose. 952 refs / 154 files. Reverses the old 'internal name stays fabledassistant' convention. Code-only: live databases are still physically named 'fabledassistant'. Deployed environments must set POSTGRES_DB / POSTGRES_USER (or rename the DB) since the defaults now resolve to 'scribe'. Repo (FabledScribe), git host (fabledsword), MCP (fabled-git) and the image name (fabledscribe) are intentionally unchanged. ruff check src/ clean locally; CI (typecheck + pytest) is the gate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-03 15:48:35 -04:00