4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusen	4ba544e2af	refactor(theme): retire the --color-* shim — the sweep it promised, run ... #2533. theme.css claimed "removing this block is a rename sweep across the components, tracked separately" — written in 67a529a, never filed, which made the comment itself an instance of the survey's presence-without-reference pattern. This is that sweep. 73 alias declarations deleted; 69 files rewritten; every --color-*-style name now references its --fs-* token directly. Mechanical by construction: the map IS the alias block, applied longest-name-first with a boundary guard so --color-text never matched inside --color-text-muted. Zero survivors outside theme.css, verified by grep rather than assumed. One deliberate survivor: --color-shadow stays DECLARED, because it was never an alias — it is a literal value the design system has no token for. Marked in place as a recorded gap: promote it to an --fs-* token when a second app needs it, don't copy the line. Nothing is lost mode-wise: the aliases' resolve-at-use-time trick (which absorbed 48 dark-mode overrides) lives one layer down in the --fs-* tokens' own derivations, which is why the sweep is a pure rename. Both CSS checkers green. Why now rather than never: check_snippets_against_design_system reports every --color-* reference as "unknown — renders as NOTHING", and nine recipe snippets recorded from components.css carried the deprecated names, making them prior art pointing the wrong way. With the sweep in, the checker's report over re-recorded snippets should be EMPTY — the acceptance test that proves the checker was right all along (#2517's correction). Refs #2533	2026-08-08 22:42:37 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	a6d6550483	fix(ui): walk the eleven dangling-style reports — two were real ... #2444. Each needed reading rather than a batch fix, and the split was 2 real losses, 4 false reports, 5 wrappers that are bare on purpose. REAL: .system-card was a flex row, and every child still says so — .system-swatch and .system-actions are flex-shrink: 0, .system-body and .system-form--inline are flex: 1. align-items: flex-start is why the swatch carries margin-top: 0.3rem: nudged onto the first line of text. .systems-list no rule AT ALL, so the systems list rendered with browser bullets and indent. Invisible to the check — see below. .graph-embed the panel is a flex column whose header is flex-shrink: 0, so this is the item that takes the remaining height. Without it the `height: 100%` on the line below resolves against auto and does nothing, which left the comment above it specifying a rule that could not work. FALSE REPORTS, and the checker was wrong rather than the code: `.pane.empty` and `td.num` are base rules for the element that carries those classes — the check read any compound with more than a lone class as a modifier. It now records a compound's whole class SET and clears an element carrying all of them, which is exact: recording the classes individually would have cleared `.pane` everywhere on the strength of a rule that only applies alongside `.empty`. Four reports gone, and a check with false reports is one that gets skimmed. BARE ON PURPOSE — .rb, .topic-group, .new-topic, .sub-list, .dash-head, and both .detail-row rows. Each namespaces descendant rules and assumes nothing about layout, which is the tell that separates them from a deleted base. All seven now carry a comment saying so, so the next reader doesn't re-litigate them and a NEW entry in the report means something actually changed. Also recorded in the script: it cannot see a class with no rule anywhere, since that is indistinguishable from a semantic-only hook. `.systems-list` was found by reading the file beside a class that WAS half-styled. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-08-05 09:26:35 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	bd60d679d9	refactor(theme): remove 184 var() fallbacks — every one was unreachable ... #2277 counted ~150 "raw colour literals bypassing the tokens". Measuring them told a different story: 184 sat in `var(--token, #fallback)` position, and a check against theme.css shows every one of those tokens IS declared. So the fallbacks could not render. Not drift — vestigial. They were also not this palette. The most common were Tailwind and Flat-UI defaults — #6366f1 indigo, #22c55e green, #f59e0b amber, #3b82f6 blue, #e74c3c and #27ae60 — a second, unsanctioned colour scheme sitting in the codebase looking like the app's colours to anyone reading it. Removing them is not tidying. #2319's lesson is that a fallback is WORSE than a missing token: a missing token renders as nothing and someone eventually notices, while a fallback renders something plausible forever. These 184 were one token rename away from silently repainting the app in Tailwind. The design token check would catch the rename — but the fallback is precisely the thing that would make it invisible if the check were ever bypassed. Literal count 152 -> 45, which matters beyond the number: a report that is mostly unreachable noise is one people stop reading, and then it stops working while still passing. What remains should be genuinely worth looking at. Done with a paren-aware transform, not a regex — `var(--x, rgba(0,0,0,.5))` nests parens and `[^)]+` would cut at the first one and leave `))` behind. Verified after: every changed line is a fallback strip and nothing else, and every var() reference still resolves. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-08-03 11:52:04 -04:00
bvandeusen	75d3d40038	feat(plan): plan-task viewer shows Applicable Rules panel	2026-05-28 10:42:03 -04:00