6 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	8406871085	fix(plugin): the instruction surfaces still said every rule binds (#3849) ... Step 3 shipped a line a session can receive — "Preference that may apply here …" — into surfaces that told it, in the most authoritative voice it has, that anything arriving in that shape is binding. That is the confusion milestone 399 exists to prevent, arriving through the one channel a session has least reason to doubt. Silent in both directions, which is why it could not wait for step 6. A session treating a preference as a rule refuses to proceed over something the operator merely preferred; and it loses the whole reason preferences exist, which is that they are brought up to date rather than obeyed. Three surfaces, each to its own budget: - SKILL.md gets the full account: kind decides force, the injected line names which in its opening words, and a preference is the one record a session keeps current itself (update_preference, with what taught the change). - scribe_static_context.md gets six lines — enough to tell the kinds apart and to say a preference is yours to update. - _INSTRUCTIONS gets four words. It is a MAP at 1978 of its 2000-char budget (#2562), and the detail belongs in the surfaces above and in the tool docstrings, which is what that budget exists to force. Guarded so it cannot drift back: a surface that claims rules bind must name the kind that does not. Pinned on the CLAIM rather than the word "bind", because a bare substring also matches bind_repo, list_repo_bindings and server.py's DNS-rebinding comment — a guard that would one day fail a skill about repo binding is rule 167's named failure, raising a false alarm about the very thing it protects. Falsified against all three surfaces losing the mention. Plugin version minted: the cache refreshes only on a version bump (#2209), so a skill edit without one reaches no installed plugin. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011cPyzNnegXHr5iRMzzy5KJ	2026-09-10 23:20:04 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	30d87e461a	feat(rules): the instruction surfaces say to RETRIEVE a rule, not only to receive one (#3523) ... Every instruction surface told a session to load the always-on rules and stopped there. None said the loaded set is partial, so an empty one read as "no rule applies" when it only ever meant "none was pushed" — different claims, and only one of them has been checked. That is #2198's asymmetry one level in. The earlier defect was trusting the SessionStart push over the explicit pull; this is trusting the resident TIER as if it were the whole rulebook. It is also why the always-on tier was the only one that worked, on any install rather than this one (rule 115): a rule nothing retrieves must be resident to bind at all, and a resident rule costs tokens in every session forever — so a rulebook that only delivers cannot grow past what one session holds. Retrieval lifts that ceiling, and it fires only if something asks. A tool-choice reflex asks least of all (#3476, #161). The same obligation now lands on all three session-start surfaces, because rule 119 makes them the specification jointly and a surface stating it differently IS the product behaving differently (#2497). Pinned by test_every_session_start_surface_states_the_conditional_retrieval, mirroring the pull test beside it. THE BUDGET TRADE. _INSTRUCTIONS sat at 1978 against a 2000 test budget, and its own comment says an addition there is a trade, never an append. Bought the new clause by trading out "Processes are saved procedures (follow verbatim)" and "Deletes are trash-recoverable" — both already in DISPLACED_TOPICS and already stated on a delivered surface, and both per-tool guidance, which by this block's doctrine belongs in the tool docstring. Now 1976. Recorded in the comment above the block so it is not silently reversed. Plugin version minted: shipped plugin content moved. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011cPyzNnegXHr5iRMzzy5KJ	2026-09-03 21:41:53 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Fable 5	2d58e74ec7	feat(reuse): recording model becomes the pattern library — every shape at first build (#2687) ... Decision #2686: snippets are the project's pattern library, not a dedup net. The floor, the reusing-code skill, and the snippet tool docstrings now state the proactive model — record every shape the first time it is built, with no will-it-recur judgment, and start later instances from the recorded shape; second-copy consolidation stays as the backstop. The floor guard test pins all three elements (tool, first-build trigger, backstop) so the model cannot silently regress to the reactive wording. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-16 11:33:24 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Fable 5	fb757fb4ba	feat(reuse): recording gets a seam — the prior-art hook asks for create_snippet when duplication is proven and unrecorded (#2664) ... Zero snippets were ever recorded outside sessions already thinking about snippets: the read side had a real seam (the PreToolUse hook) and the record side had a trailing clause of a floor bullet. The trigger moment — 'I just wrote the second copy' — is mid-Write/Edit, so the nudge now rides the same hook: when the local arm proves the definition exists elsewhere in the repo AND Scribe returned no record of it, the context block asks for create_snippet. Both gates or silence, so a brand-new helper and an already-recorded one stay nudge-free. Floor bullet promoted to name the trigger moments (extract, hoist, second copy); guarded by test the same way the Systems reflex is. Plugin 0.1.29 so the cache picks up the hook (#2209). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-14 21:45:32 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Fable 5	3ff8803593	feat(instructions): fit the delivery fold — 2k server map, floor Systems reflex, write-time systems_hint ... Claude Code injects only the first ~2,048 chars of an MCP server's instructions and silently cuts the rest mid-word (#2562, observed live): _INSTRUCTIONS was 20,002 chars, so ~90% — including all Systems tagging guidance — never reached any session. Rearchitect delivery around what each surface actually delivers: - _INSTRUCTIONS becomes a 1,997-char purpose-sorted map, with a header comment stating the budget and where detail belongs instead. - Tool docstrings keep the per-tool HOW (audit: nearly all displaced topics were already duplicated there); backfill the four gaps — enter_project session scoping + project bootstrap, create_rule entity-vs-rule test, create_design_system not-a-rulebook, create_system two-records test. - The plugin static context (the delivery floor) gains the tag-to-Systems reflex and a surfaces-layering statement; plugin 0.1.25 -> 0.1.26 so the executing cache refreshes (#2209). - create_task / create_note / create_snippet return a systems_hint when a record is created untagged in a project that has Systems — in-band at the exact write it applies to, fail-open like the dedup gate. - Guards: _INSTRUCTIONS length budget, floor-states-the-reflex, and a displaced-topics sweep asserting every cut topic still lives on a delivered surface. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-09 12:53:35 -04:00
bvandeusen	ffd08507f1	fix(instructions): the push is an optimisation, not the bridge ... _INSTRUCTIONS told an agent the SessionStart hook was how rules reach a session, and used that as the argument against a host-memory pointer. The using-scribe skill said the opposite — pull them yourself, treat any push as a bonus. Nothing said which wins, and #119 makes these surfaces the specification, so this was the product behaving two ways. #2198 is the case that settles it: every plugin hook was silently inert for an extended period. An agent trusting the push would have run with no binding rules and no signal, while those rules govern branch, commit and push. So: _INSTRUCTIONS now leads with the explicit pull and names the hook as a delivery optimisation. The argument against a host-memory pointer survives — it never needed the hook to be reliable, because the pull IS the bridge and it is written into every surface a session already loads. The static context gains the tiebreaker for the next disagreement: follow the surface that assumes least about its own delivery. "Most detailed wins" is wrong precisely because the most detailed surface is the one with a delivery precondition. It goes there by its own logic — a tiebreaker arriving over MCP cannot arbitrate what to do when MCP is absent. Guarded by tests/test_instruction_surfaces_agree.py: every session-start surface states the pull, and no surface names the push without it. Plugin version bumped so the cache that executes actually picks the file up (#2209). Refs #2497	2026-08-06 08:23:36 -04:00