Commit Graph
5 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bvandeusenandClaude Fable 5 3ff8803593 feat(instructions): fit the delivery fold — 2k server map, floor Systems reflex, write-time systems_hint
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 7s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 18s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 32s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 47s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 28s
Claude Code injects only the first ~2,048 chars of an MCP server's
instructions and silently cuts the rest mid-word (#2562, observed live):
_INSTRUCTIONS was 20,002 chars, so ~90% — including all Systems tagging
guidance — never reached any session. Rearchitect delivery around what
each surface actually delivers:

- _INSTRUCTIONS becomes a 1,997-char purpose-sorted map, with a header
  comment stating the budget and where detail belongs instead.
- Tool docstrings keep the per-tool HOW (audit: nearly all displaced
  topics were already duplicated there); backfill the four gaps —
  enter_project session scoping + project bootstrap, create_rule
  entity-vs-rule test, create_design_system not-a-rulebook,
  create_system two-records test.
- The plugin static context (the delivery floor) gains the
  tag-to-Systems reflex and a surfaces-layering statement; plugin
  0.1.25 -> 0.1.26 so the executing cache refreshes (#2209).
- create_task / create_note / create_snippet return a systems_hint when
  a record is created untagged in a project that has Systems — in-band
  at the exact write it applies to, fail-open like the dedup gate.
- Guards: _INSTRUCTIONS length budget, floor-states-the-reflex, and a
  displaced-topics sweep asserting every cut topic still lives on a
  delivered surface.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-09 12:53:35 -04:00
bvandeusen 473280e690 chore(design-systems): stop teaching one install's kit in product copy
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 5s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 27s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 36s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 49s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 41s
The operator's check: this must be a system for managing design systems, not one
with the FabledSword family built into it.

No LOGIC was coupled — the audit found zero behavioural dependencies. But every
docstring example, every UI placeholder and several comments named this install's
palette, so a stranger creating their first design system was shown
"FabledSword" as the expected shape and `--fs-obsidian` as the expected token.
Examples teach, and these taught the wrong thing.

Placeholders now describe the SHAPE ("Your house style", "--surface-page")
rather than naming one instance's contents, and the token-name placeholder now
says the thing worth saying: name it for its purpose, because `--obsidian` and
`--button-bg` both stop being true the moment the value or the element changes.

Not fixed here, and it is the one real coupling left: DesignView.vue hardcodes
rule 65's button variants and rule 60's type scale as literal arrays, so a
stranger's Design page would display this family's specs. Those arrays exist
because there was no design system to read from — which there now is. They go
when the panel is repointed (#2295), not before.

Scribe's own stylesheet comments ("Moss action-primary per Hybrid") are left
alone: that is the app CONSUMING the family style, which is what dogfooding
looks like, not the tool assuming it.
2026-07-31 10:18:53 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.8 dd1fc2d506 feat(mcp): extend dedup gate to create_rule / create_project_rule
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 34s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 53s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 52s
Completes the Phase 5 follow-up: rules now get the same update-over-create
gate. Title-based only (rules aren't a semantic-retrieval/RAG surface), scoped
to the same topic (rulebook rule) or same project (project rule). force=true
overrides; fail-open like the note/task gate.

Deferred-item decisions (operator): REST/web gating SKIPPED (kept MCP-only —
humans rarely double-create and a hard block needs UI affordance); orphan scope
kept orphan↔orphan (no change). So this rule gate is the only remaining build.

- services/dedup.py: find_duplicate_rule(title, topic_id|project_id).
- create_rule + create_project_rule: force param + gate.
- tests: rule title match, scope-required guard, tool gate (block + force).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-14 13:43:17 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.8 50b6902fe2 docs(mcp): encode rule-scope model in rulebook tool descriptions
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 34s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 48s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 59s
Make the always-on / subscribed / project-rule distinction explicit at the
authoring surface so it can't silently regress (for this operator or other
users). Previously the tools said only 'cross-project rulebook rule' and a
bare 'subscribe a project' — nothing steered project-specific detail away
from shared rulebooks, which is how a Scribe-pinned rule ends up binding
every family project.

Principle encoded in 5 places: a rule's home is chosen by WHO it should bind,
and both rulebook tiers are SHARED so their rules stay general — they differ
in reach (all projects vs opt-in by theme), not generality. Project-specific
detail goes in create_project_rule.

- server.py MCP instructions: add the 3-tier authoring principle
- create_rule / create_rulebook / create_project_rule / subscribe_* docstrings
- using-scribe SKILL.md: a 'Where a new rule goes' note for the pull path

Refs #755

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-10 10:15:01 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.8 b255a0f90e refactor: rename package fabledassistant -> scribe (code-only)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 35s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 54s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 1m14s
Renames src/fabledassistant -> src/scribe and all imports, plus the
default DB name and DB user/password (fabled -> scribe) in config +
compose. 952 refs / 154 files. Reverses the old 'internal name stays
fabledassistant' convention.

Code-only: live databases are still physically named 'fabledassistant'.
Deployed environments must set POSTGRES_DB / POSTGRES_USER (or rename the
DB) since the defaults now resolve to 'scribe'. Repo (FabledScribe), git
host (fabledsword), MCP (fabled-git) and the image name (fabledscribe)
are intentionally unchanged.

ruff check src/ clean locally; CI (typecheck + pytest) is the gate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-03 15:48:35 -04:00