4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	390846a3d5	fix(write-path): disclose cross-language prior art instead of hiding it ... Closes #2244. Retrieval matches on concept, and concepts are language-agnostic: asking about a TypeScript union-find scores 0.72-0.73 against a PYTHON snippet, comfortably over the 0.68 bar. That is useful — a different-language solution gives you the shape even when the code isn't reusable — but the menu line said nothing about it, so the reader either dismissed a good structural reference or pasted Python into a .ts file. Worth noting this predates the concept-query change: raw TS code already matched the Python snippet at 0.73, because the embedder reads identifiers and structure semantically rather than syntactically. The fail state has been shipping quietly; #2242 only made it an intended use rather than an accident. - knowledge._note_to_item projects `language` from the data mirror, same shape as the existing verification projection — a plain column read, no body parsing. - The semantic arm carries language through on the item it builds; it is the arm where these arise, since a snippet recorded AT the path you're editing is almost never in another language. - _prior_art_line folds it into the marker: [similar 0.72 · python]. Together with the score rather than after the title, because the two jointly are the judgement being offered. - One explanatory line is added to the menu, and only when something on it is actually tagged. Two deliberate calls: LABEL, DON'T FILTER. A stricter threshold for foreign-language hits would suppress exactly the shape-borrowing this exists for. They were never the problem; their being undisclosed was. ONLY CLAIM A MISMATCH YOU CAN ESTABLISH. _foreign_language returns "" when either side is unknown — unrecognised extension, or a snippet with no recorded language. A wrong "· python" is worse than no tag. Same-language hits stay unlabelled, so the common case keeps a clean line and the preamble stays off the menu entirely. Operator-typed language names fold through an alias table first (py/python3 → python, tsx → typescript, c++ → cpp); unrecognised names pass through lowercased, which still makes an unknown-but-equal pair compare equal. Trap found while building: _note() in the tests is a MagicMock, so `note.data` auto-created a truthy mock that would have rendered its repr into a menu line. Both test helpers now set data = None explicitly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-07-30 10:31:56 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	57781770c3	feat(write-path): query snippets by concept, not by raw code ... Implements #2242, from the operator's question: would it make more sense to search by the concept of the snippet than by the code itself? It would, measurably. A snippet's embedded text is f"{title}\n{body}", and a snippet's body is composed markdown — When to use / Signature / Location, then the fenced code — so `when_to_use` appears TWICE in the vector and the document is prose-forward. The semantic arm was interrogating it with raw code carrying no prose at all. Measured on the deployed instance against snippet #2222: query built from score best unrelated separation raw code body 0.743 0.630 0.11 name + docstring 0.823 0.602 0.22 hand-written concept prose 0.835 0.583 0.25 A 12-word description beats a near-verbatim reimplementation of the function, and code-as-query RAISES the noise floor. It's also the cleanest explanation for the fragment miss recorded on #2223: a short excerpt carries almost no prose to match a document that is mostly prose. So build the query from what the code says it's FOR — declarations plus the first docstring / JSDoc / leading comment block — shaped as "name(params) — what it does", mirroring a snippet's own title, which is the form that measured 0.823. Server-side rather than in the hook: no manifest bump, so installed 0.1.20 plugins get this immediately; multi-language parsing in bash would be miserable; and it's unit-testable here. Two rules worth calling out, both measured rather than chosen: - NO DOC, NO REWRITE. A bare identifier is not a concept and scored 0.671 vs the code body's 0.743. Separation from noise is identical either way (0.113), but the absolute drops under the 0.68 bar, so preferring a bare name would convert a comfortable hit into a miss. Undocumented code keeps the raw payload. - The 48-char floor still judges the RAW payload, before the rewrite. A concept query is allowed to be shorter than the floor — that is the point, the best queries are short — but a sub-floor edit stays silent even with a docstring. Applying the floor after extraction would discard the best queries. Regex, not a parser: this is on a PreToolUse critical path and an Edit's new_string is rarely a valid module, so a miss must cost only a fallback. Every unrecognised language (Vue SFC, config files) degrades to exactly the previous behaviour. Telemetry now logs the concept query rather than the code, since retrieval_logs is what the threshold gets tuned from and the two aren't comparable. 0.68 is left alone: signal rises to 0.82 while noise FALLS to 0.58, so the bar sits mid-gap instead of near the edge. To be re-measured against the deployed instance rather than assumed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-07-30 09:58:06 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	1fb883b72f	fix(write-path): give the semantic arm its own threshold + a payload floor ... Closes #2223. The write-path prior-art trigger's semantic arm shared auto-inject's 0.55 threshold, which was tuned on prose. Code embeddings sit on a much higher similarity floor — any two Python-shaped payloads share keywords, indentation and structure — so 0.55 landed INSIDE the noise band. Measured against the live instance: near-duplicate of a recorded helper 0.73-0.74 true positive unrelated colour math / Vue SFC / CSS 0.55-0.63 false positive `x = 1` 0.58 false positive 6 of 8 probe payloads produced a nudge; 4 were noise. The margin gate couldn't help — _AUTOINJECT_BAND is relative to the top hit, so with a single hit it never engages. Two gates are now the write-path arm's own: - kb_writepath_threshold, default 0.68 — above every measured false positive, still 0.05 below both true positives. Auto-inject keeps 0.55; it was tuned on prose and is not implicated. The comment this replaces explicitly reserved the split for when telemetry showed the surfaces wanted different values, so this is the change it described, not a reversal of it. - WRITEPATH_MIN_CODE_CHARS = 48 non-whitespace chars, below which the semantic arm doesn't run at all. Whitespace is excluded so a deeply indented one-liner can't pass on padding. 48 sits under the smallest plausible reusable helper (~60) and well over a degenerate edit, so it errs toward keeping recall — precision is the threshold's job. This is the cheap half of the operator's #89 idea; the full length<->threshold curve stays open there, since they asked to brainstorm it rather than have a scale invented for them. top_k stays shared — "how many titles at once" means the same thing on both surfaces. The existing tests were passing `code="x"` / `code="def f(): ..."` into the semantic arm, i.e. exactly the payloads the floor now drops, so the gate tests were never exercising a realistic payload. They now use a REAL_CODE fixture, plus new coverage for the floor (trivial payload, padding, place-arm unaffected, real helper passes) and a guard on the constant itself. Settings UI carries the new knob with the reasoning in its hint, and the write-path checkbox no longer claims it shares the threshold. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-07-29 23:26:59 -04:00
bvandeusen	e0328f2b1c	feat(plugin): write-path trigger — offer prior art before code is rewritten ... The milestone headline. Auto-inject fires on the operator's prompt; the moment reuse is actually lost is later, when the agent decides mid-task to write a helper. A PreToolUse hook on Write|Edit now fires there. Channel: `additionalContext` with NO permissionDecision, so the note reaches Claude beside the tool result and the write is never blocked — a recall aid must not be able to stop the operator's work. Plain stdout would have been invisible to the model, and deny/ask would have made a nudge into a gate. Two arms, different in kind: - BY PLACE — a snippet recorded at this path (or its directory) is prior art by definition, not resemblance, so it is neither scored nor thresholded. This is what #2083's reverse lookup was built to answer. - BY MEANING — semantic search restricted to snippets (new `note_type` filter on semantic_search_notes) over the code about to be written. Place ranks first; the top-k cap spans both arms. Gates carried over from milestone 93 verbatim: threshold, margin, session dedup, titles-never-bodies. Own `source='write_path'` in retrieval_logs so precision is tunable separately — the docstring records that the place arm is unlogged and hands that to #2085. Its own on/off in Settings but the SAME threshold/top-k: one "how loud may Scribe be" knob is easier to reason about than two that drift, and splitting them later is then a data-backed change rather than a guess. Details worth keeping: the hook sends a REPO-RELATIVE path because that is how locations are recorded; the git remote resolves to a project and is never used as the location `repo` filter (different namespaces, would silently match nothing); the endpoint stays a GET because a read-scoped API key cannot POST and every other hook depends on that. plugin.json 0.1.17 -> 0.1.18. Refs #2082, milestone #232.	2026-07-28 09:08:17 -04:00