8 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	46d9134b10	feat(409): a task write returns where the task sits (#4010) ... Step 1 of milestone 409 "Response shapes". An agent reporting finished work is asked to say which milestone it belongs to, which step of how many, and what is next. Without those facts to hand it reconstructs them, and a reconstruction reads exactly like the truth when it is wrong. create_task and update_task (MCP) and the REST create/update task routes now return a placement block: project; and for a task in a milestone, the milestone, position {step, of}, progress {completed, total, pct} and next (the next open step, falling back to the earliest open one before it). - Step order is creation order, not get_milestone listing order, which reshuffles on every update. - Siblings are read through readable_notes_clause; position and progress are computed over that same readable set, so a collaborator is never shown a step title they cannot open, and a note share alone reveals no plan. - Fail-open and omitted when empty, like every in-band decoration. - _no_embedding moves into conftest as one opt-in fixture for both integration modules that need it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-14 08:43:04 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	69d93898d9	fix(tasks): a task's kind is correctable — the Kind select stops lying (#3129) ... `kind` was accepted at CREATE on both doors and dropped at UPDATE on both: update_task had no such parameter, and the REST PATCH allow-list never read the field. So a task filed under the wrong kind could never be corrected. The frontend made it worse by looking like it worked. TaskEditorView binds a Kind select, marks the form dirty, and HAS ALWAYS SENT `kind` in the update payload — the store even types it. The route ignored it, returned 200, the view optimistically updated, the toast said "Task saved", and the old value came back on reload. Silent success, same class as #2709. Found by trying to re-file #3126 as a spike after deploying 0091. It could not be done; the task had to be recreated as #3128 and the original cancelled. One seam, not two doors. `minted_kind()` lives in services/notes.py because the REST route cannot import an MCP tool module and a second spelling of the list is how the doors would come to disagree. Both create and update route through it, so a bogus kind is now a readable error rather than a CheckViolationError surfacing as a 500. TaskKind joins TaskStatus and TaskPriority as a real enum, and update_note validates task_kind exactly as it already validated those two — the field had been reaching setattr through the hasattr guard with no validation at all, unnoticed only because no door ever offered it. The `-> plan` question #3129 raised is answered in code rather than left implicit: MINTABLE_KINDS is work/issue/spike, deliberately NARROWER than the column's CHECK. `plan` stays a valid stored value because historical plan-tasks carry it and must stay writable; it is simply not a value any door hands out, and the refusal names start_planning because a caller reaching for it wants a plan. The whitelist and the policy answer different questions and are not the same list. Every new test reads the value BACK. One that only asserted the call succeeded would have passed against the broken code — the route returned 200 while dropping the field, which is how this survived long enough to be found by hand. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-27 15:55:04 -04:00
bvandeusen	c18139622c	fix(telemetry): the human half of the pull ledger recorded one kind in three ... Opening a snippet in the UI recorded rest_snippet. Opening a note or a task recorded nothing — so the most direct evidence the product has that anyone cares about a record existed for one kind out of three, and the other two sat at zero pulls looking like dead weight beside a kind that merely had a counter. Not an open question about intent: models/note_usage.py already documented 'rest_note' as a source value. Nothing wrote it. The design named it and the implementation stopped at snippets. Adds rest_note and rest_task. Tagged by SURFACE rather than by the record's kind, matching rest_snippet — the kind is a join away, but which surface asked is not recoverable after the fact. The mcp_/rest_ split stays load-bearing: "is this dead weight" is served by any pull, "was that injected line useful" by agent pulls alone, and a human clicking a link would inflate exactly the number #1038 and #2085 gate on. The vocabulary comment in the model was itself the stale-enumeration shape this survey keeps finding — it named a source nothing wrote while omitting sources that existed. Replaced with the naming CONVENTION plus a pointer to grep, which cannot drift, rather than a longer list that would go stale the same way. Guard extended to the REST surface, same derivation as the MCP half: a route registered at exactly /<int:x> for GET is a detail view, and one reaching a note-backed loader must record. Handler source is expanded one level through module-private helpers, without which get_snippet_route — the route that already got this right — would drop out of the check by loading via _load_snippet. Verified the guard fires when a call is removed. Renamed test_mcp_pull_telemetry.py -> test_pull_telemetry.py; it is no longer only about MCP. Closes #2476	2026-08-06 08:51:21 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	5c51e29f26	fix(embeddings): embed in the service, so every caller gets it (#2056) ... A note or task created through MCP was not semantically searchable until the next restart's backfill ran. Embedding fired at the five REST route handlers and nowhere else; the MCP tools call the service directly, so they skipped it. The shape of this bug is the reason to care: it is invisible on an instance that redeploys constantly (this one does, per rule 46) and permanent on one that doesn't. Rule 115 — the product has to stand up for the install that restarts twice a year, not just for the one that restarts hourly. Moved to services/notes.embed_note(), called from create_note and update_note, and deleted from all five routes. Every caller — REST, MCP, recurrence, snippets — now gets it by construction rather than by remembering. Two things fall out of having one implementation instead of six: - It uses note.user_id, the OWNER. The routes were inconsistent: some passed the caller's uid, some the owner's. On a shared record the caller's id mints a second embedding row that nothing reads. - services/snippets.py's _embed_snippet existed only because snippets are created via MCP and the routes couldn't cover them. Every one of its four call sites goes through notes_svc, so the helper and its four calls are gone, along with the eight test patches that existed to neutralise it. RuntimeError (no running loop — unit tests, scripts) and any indexing failure are both swallowed: a write that succeeded must not be failed by its index. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-07-31 22:46:57 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	9fa474b3c4	fix(mcp): make get_note / get_task share-aware ... The injected menu tells the agent to open any hit with get_note(id), and that menu can list a collaborator's record reached through a shared project. The fetch was still owner-only, so those lines answered "not found" — for a record the same user opens fine in the browser. The agent path was strictly narrower than the web path for the same id. Same boundary miss as #2093: the list side was widened for sharing, the fetch side wasn't. Both tools now resolve through get_note_for_user, apply the trash filter themselves (permission resolution says nothing about liveness), and attach describe_provenance so a shared record arrives marked as someone else's rather than passing as the caller's. routes/tasks.py's parent-title lookup had the same narrowness: a shared subtask rendered as an orphan when its parent was equally shared. Four fetch tests across three files were patching notes_svc.get_note and had to be retargeted — note 2109's third sub-case, caught by grepping tests/ for the old name before pushing rather than by CI (#2159). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RLwAaV4DQEmVyn496HnEvt	2026-07-27 15:18:03 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.8	f7742173aa	chore(plans): make kind=plan retirement consistent across MCP, REST, UI, skills ... Audit of the plugin + MCP surface after milestone-as-plan (T3): every path that could still create a kind=plan task or describe the old plan-task model is now aligned with the hard-retire decision. - create_task (MCP + REST POST /api/tasks): reject kind=plan with a message pointing to start_planning. The 'plan' enum value stays valid so legacy plan-tasks remain readable; update paths never touch kind, so they round-trip. - create_task / get_task docstrings: 'plan' dropped from creatable kinds; get_task's rules-augmentation noted as legacy-only (get_milestone for new plans). - skills/writing-plans: rewritten for milestone-as-plan (body = design, steps = child tasks, get_milestone to read back). - skills/using-scribe: "plans live in milestones via start_planning", not kind=plan. - TaskEditorView Kind selector: offers Work/Issue; "Plan (legacy)" shown only when the loaded task is already kind=plan (display round-trip). - test: create_task rejects kind=plan. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-14 12:31:51 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.8	79040fe5db	feat(issues): S4b backend — REST task issue fields + dashboard open-issues ... Closes the REST gap S4b's UI needs (S2 only extended MCP tools): - routes/tasks.py: create/update accept system_ids (set-semantics) + arose_from_id; GET/create/update return the task's associated systems. kind=issue already flowed via task_kind. Associations set via services/systems (ACL-checked; can_write_note already gated). - services/dashboard.py: _open_issues section (owner-scoped, ranked like other task lists, capped) added to build_dashboard. Dashboard test updated for the new key. Refs plan 825 (S4b, backend half). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-14 10:42:24 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.8	b255a0f90e	refactor: rename package fabledassistant -> scribe (code-only) ... Renames src/fabledassistant -> src/scribe and all imports, plus the default DB name and DB user/password (fabled -> scribe) in config + compose. 952 refs / 154 files. Reverses the old 'internal name stays fabledassistant' convention. Code-only: live databases are still physically named 'fabledassistant'. Deployed environments must set POSTGRES_DB / POSTGRES_USER (or rename the DB) since the defaults now resolve to 'scribe'. Repo (FabledScribe), git host (fabledsword), MCP (fabled-git) and the image name (fabledscribe) are intentionally unchanged. ruff check src/ clean locally; CI (typecheck + pytest) is the gate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-03 15:48:35 -04:00