Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 59407728e6 feat(planning): start_planning hands back the active plan that already covers the work (#4079)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 5s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 13s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m10s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 1m15s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 1m22s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Step 4 of milestone 415 "An existing plan is found before a new one is made".
A session that could not see an existing plan made a second one beside it.
start_planning and create_milestone now ask first: an ACTIVE milestone in the
project with the same title, or one that reads as the same plan (title, design
and steps against milestone embeddings), is returned with its progress and a
pointer to create_records(milestone_id=...). Nothing is created; force=true
bypasses.

- dedup.find_matching_plan / plan_gate / plan_match_response; access-checked
  before either arm (rule 78), fail-open like the other gates.
- Done milestones never block; the semantic arm needs 200+ chars of candidate.
- kb_plan_match_threshold (default 0.90) is a setting, in the Settings view,
  and pinned against the Python default by test_settings_defaults_agree.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01821k5B3Ysecp9fNYs92Kuy
2026-09-15 13:43:18 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 441a1ac31d fix(#4016): records that cite each other are created together, and a guessed id is refused
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 1m2s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m0s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m39s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 39s
Sessions predicted the ids their next creates would get and wrote them into
plan bodies and reference notes before the records existed. The database
never collides; the sequence is shared by every session and user, so any
concurrent create took the guessed numbers and the references pointed at
someone else's records.

- create_records (new MCP tool) and start_planning(body=, steps=) create
  their records in ONE transaction: insert, flush for the real ids, rewrite
  {{ref:N}} / {{ref:milestone}} placeholders as #id "title", commit. No
  prediction, no waiting, no stub records left behind when a batch fails.
  Ids need not be consecutive and nothing depends on it.
- Every MCP create/update of a note, task or milestone refuses a #N sitting
  just above the highest assigned id (within 50): that can only be a guess.
  Refusal, not warning. Numbers far above the max (PRs, forge issues) pass.
- notes.build_note splits validation out of create_note so the batch
  validates records exactly as a single create does.
- writing-plans and using-scribe say to pass steps up front and never write
  an unassigned id; plugin version minted.

Integration test runs six concurrent batches and checks each resolves its
placeholders to its own records, and that a failing batch writes nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-14 08:33:56 -04:00