4aae4973f76695c59577312441a46891332d69a2
7
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
c83bedf3be |
feat(rules): the check is editable, visible, and sweepable in the UI (#3098, milestone 312 step 4)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 5s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 29s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 34s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m13s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 37s
Rule 27 — the milestone was backend-only until this. Four surfaces:
RULE EDITOR — verify_with and expires_when under a legend that asks the
actual question ("Can this rule go stale?") and says empty is the normal
answer, because most rules are decisions and a form that implies a missing
field would get them filled in out of tidiness. When the SAVED rule carries
a check, the stamp shows with Still true / No longer true beside it. The
stamp reads the stored value, not the draft: an unsaved edit to the textarea
has not been run against anything.
SWEEP PANE — its own surface, not a filter on the rule list. That list can
only ever show one topic of one rulebook, and a rule that has gone false
belongs to no one rulebook; filtering it would under-report, which is the
failure this whole surface exists to catch. Reached from the rulebook list,
below the rulebooks, because that is where you go to look at rules.
RULE ROWS — a chip only on rules carrying a check, so its presence is the
signal. PROJECT RULES TAB — the check shows beside `why` when a rule has
one, read-only: that tab is the project's view of what binds it.
NO AGE-GRADED COLOUR anywhere, deliberately. The sweep is already ordered by
urgency, so a red/amber ramp would restate the ordering AND require an
invented "stale after N days" threshold — a magic number nobody could defend
and the first thing to go out of date. --fs-overdue is error red and reserved
for a broken promise like a missed due date; a verification age is not one,
and colouring it that way makes a rule someone just wrote look broken. Only
"never" is marked, because it is categorically different from a date rather
than a worse one — and it is marked by weight, not hue.
An empty sweep says "Nothing to check", not nothing: good news must not read
as a broken page.
Two chips (tier, then verification) turned out byte-identical, so .rule-chip
moves to rules-shared.css and snippet #2906 is updated to match rather than
left describing a file that has moved on. Its header comment counted the
panes it served; that count went stale the moment a fourth arrived, so it no
longer counts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
9190fa0f10 |
refactor(frontend): the pay-down edits the first script dropped after its assertion stop — SharedWithMe/ProjectView page-header+empty-msg remainders, DesignSystems/Settings field-hint+.input trims, pane form-buttons deletions (milestone 302 step 4)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 7s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 20s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m2s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 35s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
a72605de8f |
refactor(frontend): the last pay-down, part 1 — three dead views deleted, editor rules shared, .page-container + .fs-input canon, rules-shared.css; a one-declaration CSS body is not a shape (#2903, milestone 299 step 5)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 34s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 34s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 54s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
The derive queue said the biggest duplicate families were whole views: TaskViewerView, UserManagementView and LogsView were imported nowhere — left behind when tasks moved to the editor and users/logs became SettingsView tabs. Deleted (rule 22). Note/TaskEditorView carried six identical scoped rules -> editor-shared.css (the .tag-suggest-row gap the scoped copies actually rendered wins). Three views wrapped the page under three names -> .page-container in components.css. Three scoped input recipes -> the design system fs-input recipe (snippet #2336), verbatim, in components.css; width/ box-sizing stay with the caller. The three rules panes share .pane and the pane heading via rules-shared.css (the auth-shared pattern, #2852). Ledger: a single-declaration CSS rule keeps its selector in its fingerprint, so `color: var(--fs-text-tertiary)` under five different names is no longer a five-file "identical body" family — the first pay-down found that most of the 148 dup families were exactly this, and nobody would consolidate them. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
4ba544e2af |
refactor(theme): retire the --color-* shim — the sweep it promised, run
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 7s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 17s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 34s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 48s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 37s
#2533. theme.css claimed "removing this block is a rename sweep across the
components, tracked separately" — written in
|
||
|
|
bd60d679d9 |
refactor(theme): remove 184 var() fallbacks — every one was unreachable
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 16s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 23s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 25s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 57s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 43s
#2277 counted ~150 "raw colour literals bypassing the tokens". Measuring them told a different story: 184 sat in `var(--token, #fallback)` position, and a check against theme.css shows every one of those tokens IS declared. So the fallbacks could not render. Not drift — vestigial. They were also not this palette. The most common were Tailwind and Flat-UI defaults — #6366f1 indigo, #22c55e green, #f59e0b amber, #3b82f6 blue, #e74c3c and #27ae60 — a second, unsanctioned colour scheme sitting in the codebase looking like the app's colours to anyone reading it. Removing them is not tidying. #2319's lesson is that a fallback is WORSE than a missing token: a missing token renders as nothing and someone eventually notices, while a fallback renders something plausible forever. These 184 were one token rename away from silently repainting the app in Tailwind. The design token check would catch the rename — but the fallback is precisely the thing that would make it invisible if the check were ever bypassed. Literal count 152 -> 45, which matters beyond the number: a report that is mostly unreachable noise is one people stop reading, and then it stops working while still passing. What remains should be genuinely worth looking at. Done with a paren-aware transform, not a regex — `var(--x, rgba(0,0,0,.5))` nests parens and `[^)]+` would cut at the first one and leave `))` behind. Verified after: every changed line is a fallback strip and nothing else, and every var() reference still resolves. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs |
||
|
|
658348f208 |
feat(rules): always_on rulebook flag + Scribe-first prompt
Adds rulebooks.always_on (migration 0058) and a new list_always_on_rules MCP tool so a session-start eager pull can fetch standing rules without needing an active-project notion. Updates _INSTRUCTIONS so Claude calls the new tool at session start and codifies engineering rules in Scribe rather than CLAUDE.md / auto-memory. Seeds FabledSword family rulebook to always_on=true on migrate, matching its design role as the cross-project standards rulebook. Frontend: badge in RulebookListPane for always-on rulebooks; toggle in RulebookDetailPane header bound to a new toggleAlwaysOn store action. This is S1+S2 of the rules-consolidation plan (Scribe task #508). S3 (project-scoped rules) and S4 (enter_project handshake) follow. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
75d8e7ab49 | feat(rulebook): RulesView three-pane shell + child panes + rule editor |