21 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusenandClaude Fable 5	3162332a13	feat(prior-art): edit-time record-sync nudge — the sync class (#2708) ... A snippet recorded AT the exact file being edited is not a reuse suggestion — it IS the record of the file being changed. The write-path hint now renders those as their own SYNC class: 'snippet #N records this file — updating the record is part of the edit (update_snippet / verify_snippet)'. Nearby and semantic hits stay the reuse menu. The two classes dedup on separate per-session channels (exclude_ids vs exclude_sync_ids, .ids vs .sync.ids in the hook), so a reuse hint shown early in a session can no longer silence the record-sync nudge when the recorded file itself is edited later. Sync surfacing is measured under its own note_usage source (write_path_sync) — its pull-through rate is the scoreboard for whether edit-time sync actually happens, per decision #2707 (no forge connection; records stay current in the session that has the context). Plugin 0.1.31. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-16 20:05:01 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Fable 5	9c68faa0bd	feat(processes): composition contract — the process is the skeleton, the conversation supplies the parameters ... Extends #2582's fix per the operator's direction: a stored Process must incorporate the context it was triggered with, not displace it. No new plumbing needed — the live context is already in the session; what was missing is the stated contract. get_process now carries it: live constraints/scope/focus fold into the procedure and override its defaults where they disagree; a clarify step asks only what the conversation has NOT already answered (confirm interpretations, don't re-ask); stated concerns become lenses the procedure applies, not text it discards. The sync-generated skill stubs state the short form. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-10 08:39:02 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Fable 5	66c4fd1b88	fix(sync): process-skill triggers invoke by name only — resemblance offers, never substitutes ... Scribe issue #2582: the sync wrote "Use when {title}-type work is requested" into every generated process skill, so a bespoke live prompt that merely resembled a stored Process got the Process's canned procedure — and inherited approvals embedded in its body (the Drift Audit's fan-out opt-in) that the conversation never granted. Observed live: an explicit systems-review request with its own constraints was answered with the Drift Audit clarify menu recommending ~15 parallel auditors. New trigger contract, both variants: follow verbatim only when invoked by name; on mere resemblance the live instructions govern — offer the process, ask before following, and never inherit embedded approvals the operator hasn't granted in this conversation. (The Drift Audit process record itself was also rewritten to a sequential in-context walk — data change, live already, recorded in the same issue.) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-10 08:33:40 -04:00
bvandeusen	2d1e26f38f	feat(telemetry): ambient surfacings count, apart — enter_project and the skill sync emit ... #2477, option (a) as decided, with the readout changed in the same commit. ## The two silent surfaces enter_project returns open tasks + recent notes on every project entry — probably the largest surfacing by volume — and emitted nothing, so the pulls it caused floated unattributed and the surfaced:pulled ratio ran against a denominator missing its biggest contributor. Now source "enter_project". build_process_manifest installs every reachable Process as an auto-surfacing skill on the operator's machine — its own docstring calls it the most consequential passive surface Scribe has — and emitted nothing, so a Process matched on every relevant turn and never opened was indistinguishable from one never installed. Now source "process_skill_sync": the honest event is "installed", which is a surfacing in effect since the description sits in front of the model each session. ## The readout, same commit — the condition option (a) carried Both surfaces are AMBIENT: top-N-by-recency and install-everything are not ranked choices. Pooling them into surfaced_count would make a note's number dominated by "recently updated in a project you opened", and dead-weight detection would read that as popularity — the wrong number read confidently, which is the corrupts-data tier the survey ranked above everything else. So usage_for_notes splits: surfaced_count stays RANKED-ONLY (every existing consumer's reading — "surfaced often, never pulled → dead weight" — keeps meaning what it meant), and ambient_count is new. Classified in SQL via a CASE on AMBIENT_SOURCES so the group count stays three rows per note, not one per distinct source. Pulls stay pooled: "did anyone ever open this?" does not depend on how it was found. #1038 and #2085 read agent pulls and ranked surfacings; both are unaffected by ambient volume, which is the point. Refs #2477	2026-08-08 22:39:13 -04:00
bvandeusen	45ba4aab25	fix(telemetry): the two invisible retrievals log, and /api/search takes scope ... #2463, the remaining findings (finding 3 landed with f11a547). ## The reuse slot logs (source: reuse_slot) A real semantic query competing for an auto-inject menu slot, and the ledger was asymmetric: the scored hit it DISPLACED was in retrieval_logs, the query that displaced it was not — so the slot could never be evaluated against what it replaced. #1038 and #2085 are gated on this ledger being complete. ## Browse search logs (source: browse_search) The human's main search surface, and it logged nothing — so retrieval_logs claimed the web's search was /api/search. Measured while fixing: /api/search has ZERO frontend consumers; the web UI searches through /api/knowledge exclusively. The table wasn't just under-describing the UI, it was describing a surface the UI never touches. The task's check — does folding human queries into the corpus skew the precision signal thresholds are tuned against? — is answered by the source column: distinct values (browse_search, reuse_slot beside the existing four) mean tuning includes or excludes human traffic deliberately rather than by accident. Same resolution as the mcp_/rest_ split in note_usage_events. ## /api/search takes project_id (and logs it) The route logged project_id=None unconditionally while the MCP tool insists the agent pass the active project. Now optional, default global: with no frontend consumer, this route serves API callers, and an API caller states its scope explicitly — the default-scope UI decision the task flagged is moot until a UI actually consumes the route, which is recorded rather than guessed. Refs #2463	2026-08-08 20:00:22 -04:00
bvandeusen	f20c019f2a	feat(supersession): demote what a later note overtook, and label it ... Step 3 of #278. First step with visible effect. ## Where the demotion happens, and why not in SQL Applied AFTER the pgvector fetch, over an over-fetched candidate set, not as part of the ORDER BY. Ordering by `distance + penalty` would be exact and would turn an indexed top-k into a scan-and-sort of every embedded note — the HNSW index from migration 0067 can only serve a raw-distance ordering. So the query fetches 3x the requested rows by raw distance and the re-rank happens in Python. Demoting after a LIMIT k with no over-fetch would have been theatre: the cut already happened, so a superseded record pushed down still sits in the results and the live record that should have replaced it was never fetched. The cost is stated in the code: a live record outside the over-fetch window cannot be promoted in. With a 0.05 penalty against neighbours ~0.014 apart, that needs the true answer more than three ranks down, which no observed query approaches. ## Demote, never hide — enforced in three places The penalty applies to the RANKING score, not to the relevance threshold. The floor decides whether a record is relevant at all; the penalty decides which relevant record comes first. Applying it to the floor would drop a superseded record out of the results entirely, which is the one thing this must not do. It is small on purpose. Supersession is a claim about SOME of a record's content, so one that strongly answers a question nothing else answers still surfaces — just behind anything comparable that is current. Its test asserts both bounds, the upper one citing the operator's constraint rather than an optimisation. And every test here that could be satisfied by dropping a record instead asserts the record is still present. ## The dedup gate opts out A superseded record is still a duplicate of what you are about to write — the claim is that it is no longer current, not that it is gone. Demoting it there would let the same note be recorded a second time, and the second copy would be the one nothing warns about. ## The label Auto-inject marks a superseded line SUPERSEDED with a pointer to check the later record. One query for the whole menu. An agent handed stale material with nothing marking it acts on it with full confidence, which is worse than never having surfaced it — the ranking is only half the fix. Fails open: a supersession lookup error returns unpenalised results rather than none, because unpenalised ranking is the behaviour that shipped for months and a broken search is not. Refs #278	2026-08-08 02:00:06 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	da2383b079	fix(retrieval): verify the reserved slot's kind instead of trusting the query ... CI caught six failures on f8522fb. Five were fixtures; one was a real assumption. THE REAL ONE: _reserve_slot_for_reuse trusted that a query filtered by note_type could only return reuse kinds. It now checks _record_kind on the way in. That slot exists FOR snippets and processes — one silently spent on something else is worse than no slot at all, because the resulting line is indistinguishable from one that earned its place on score. THE FIXTURES, all the same shape: MagicMock notes with is_task left to auto-create. It is truthy, and _record_kind reads task-ness FIRST — so every mock snippet in three test modules was rendering as "task". Two of those fixtures already carried a comment explaining this exact hazard about `.data`; the same reasoning applies to `.is_task` and nobody had needed it until the menu started naming kinds. One assertion was genuinely stale rather than broken: test_write_path_trigger pinned note_type == "snippet", which was the behaviour the widening replaced. Updated to the new contract, including the task_kind="issue" filter that keeps the open to-do list out. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-07-31 23:01:31 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	f8522fb28f	fix(retrieval): give reuse a slot, and let experience reach the write path ... Two mirror-image scoping mistakes, neither deliberate (#2246). AUTO-INJECT let every kind compete on raw cosine. That is fatal rather than merely imperfect here, because Scribe's project records are ABOUT software work: a task titled "surface snippets before the agent writes code" is a near-perfect lexical match for "write a function…" while answering none of it. Measured live, a prompt asking for a helper returned three records about BUILDING the retrieval system and zero snippets. Snippets are ~0.5% of the corpus, and the ratio worsens as the project record grows — which is the direction Scribe is meant to grow, so no threshold tuning fixes it. Now the best snippet or process takes the LAST slot when none won on score. Deliberately NOT held to the margin band: that band measures distance from the top overall score, and the top score is the very thing snippets lose to. It still must clear the configured threshold, so a weak snippet cannot buy the slot — silence stays the default. Skipped entirely when reuse already won, so the fix is invisible in the case it isn't needed. WRITE-PATH was snippets-only — the same mistake inverted. An issue recording "we tried this and it deadlocked" could never reach the moment that code was about to be written, though it is arguably the better prior art: it says what NOT to do. Widened to snippets plus recorded experience. That needed a filter the search layer couldn't express. "Experience" is issues plus dev-logs, which differ on is_task, so neither note_type nor is_task alone covers it. semantic_search_notes gains task_kind, which restricts TASKS to the given kinds while leaving non-task notes untouched — so note_type=("snippet", "note") + task_kind="issue" yields snippets, fixed problems and durable notes, without the open to-do list. note_type now accepts a sequence too. Non-snippet hits are labelled with their kind, because an unlabelled issue on that menu reads as "here is code to reuse", the opposite of what it says. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-07-31 22:56:31 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	731ca284c3	feat(design-systems): give a design system a way to reach the session ... Storing a design system never made a session aware of one. Rules get pushed into every session by the SessionStart hook and returned by enter_project; a design system had neither, so its standards were reachable only by an agent that already knew to call resolve_design_system — the same silent failure as a token nobody declares. That gap was invisible while the operator's visual standards also lived in a rulebook. Retiring that rulebook (which is what this unblocks) would have deleted design guidance from every session with nothing to say so. - services/design_systems.design_context() — the delivery side. Guidance is chain-merged ANCESTOR-FIRST: a child system holds only what it CHANGES, so its own guidance describes a departure from a house style it never restates, and the leaf alone is a fragment. Tokens are summarised (count + group names), not listed — a hundred declarations would crowd out the context they are meant to inform. - enter_project returns `design_system`, null when the project has none. - The SessionStart context gains a Design system block with pointers to the values, alongside the always-on rules. - server.py's entity list gains Design system, including the negative: do NOT record one as a rulebook, because a token kept as prose cannot be resolved, inherited, rendered or checked. - The rulebook-tier passage used "a design-system rulebook" as its worked example of a subscribed rulebook — it now teaches the opposite, plus a new "is this a rule at all?" test pointing at design systems, processes and snippets. - using-scribe gains a section on building UI against the project's system. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-07-31 22:10:09 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	390846a3d5	fix(write-path): disclose cross-language prior art instead of hiding it ... Closes #2244. Retrieval matches on concept, and concepts are language-agnostic: asking about a TypeScript union-find scores 0.72-0.73 against a PYTHON snippet, comfortably over the 0.68 bar. That is useful — a different-language solution gives you the shape even when the code isn't reusable — but the menu line said nothing about it, so the reader either dismissed a good structural reference or pasted Python into a .ts file. Worth noting this predates the concept-query change: raw TS code already matched the Python snippet at 0.73, because the embedder reads identifiers and structure semantically rather than syntactically. The fail state has been shipping quietly; #2242 only made it an intended use rather than an accident. - knowledge._note_to_item projects `language` from the data mirror, same shape as the existing verification projection — a plain column read, no body parsing. - The semantic arm carries language through on the item it builds; it is the arm where these arise, since a snippet recorded AT the path you're editing is almost never in another language. - _prior_art_line folds it into the marker: [similar 0.72 · python]. Together with the score rather than after the title, because the two jointly are the judgement being offered. - One explanatory line is added to the menu, and only when something on it is actually tagged. Two deliberate calls: LABEL, DON'T FILTER. A stricter threshold for foreign-language hits would suppress exactly the shape-borrowing this exists for. They were never the problem; their being undisclosed was. ONLY CLAIM A MISMATCH YOU CAN ESTABLISH. _foreign_language returns "" when either side is unknown — unrecognised extension, or a snippet with no recorded language. A wrong "· python" is worse than no tag. Same-language hits stay unlabelled, so the common case keeps a clean line and the preamble stays off the menu entirely. Operator-typed language names fold through an alias table first (py/python3 → python, tsx → typescript, c++ → cpp); unrecognised names pass through lowercased, which still makes an unknown-but-equal pair compare equal. Trap found while building: _note() in the tests is a MagicMock, so `note.data` auto-created a truthy mock that would have rendered its repr into a menu line. Both test helpers now set data = None explicitly. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-07-30 10:31:56 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	57781770c3	feat(write-path): query snippets by concept, not by raw code ... Implements #2242, from the operator's question: would it make more sense to search by the concept of the snippet than by the code itself? It would, measurably. A snippet's embedded text is f"{title}\n{body}", and a snippet's body is composed markdown — When to use / Signature / Location, then the fenced code — so `when_to_use` appears TWICE in the vector and the document is prose-forward. The semantic arm was interrogating it with raw code carrying no prose at all. Measured on the deployed instance against snippet #2222: query built from score best unrelated separation raw code body 0.743 0.630 0.11 name + docstring 0.823 0.602 0.22 hand-written concept prose 0.835 0.583 0.25 A 12-word description beats a near-verbatim reimplementation of the function, and code-as-query RAISES the noise floor. It's also the cleanest explanation for the fragment miss recorded on #2223: a short excerpt carries almost no prose to match a document that is mostly prose. So build the query from what the code says it's FOR — declarations plus the first docstring / JSDoc / leading comment block — shaped as "name(params) — what it does", mirroring a snippet's own title, which is the form that measured 0.823. Server-side rather than in the hook: no manifest bump, so installed 0.1.20 plugins get this immediately; multi-language parsing in bash would be miserable; and it's unit-testable here. Two rules worth calling out, both measured rather than chosen: - NO DOC, NO REWRITE. A bare identifier is not a concept and scored 0.671 vs the code body's 0.743. Separation from noise is identical either way (0.113), but the absolute drops under the 0.68 bar, so preferring a bare name would convert a comfortable hit into a miss. Undocumented code keeps the raw payload. - The 48-char floor still judges the RAW payload, before the rewrite. A concept query is allowed to be shorter than the floor — that is the point, the best queries are short — but a sub-floor edit stays silent even with a docstring. Applying the floor after extraction would discard the best queries. Regex, not a parser: this is on a PreToolUse critical path and an Edit's new_string is rarely a valid module, so a miss must cost only a fallback. Every unrecognised language (Vue SFC, config files) degrades to exactly the previous behaviour. Telemetry now logs the concept query rather than the code, since retrieval_logs is what the threshold gets tuned from and the two aren't comparable. 0.68 is left alone: signal rises to 0.82 while noise FALLS to 0.58, so the bar sits mid-gap instead of near the edge. To be re-measured against the deployed instance rather than assumed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-07-30 09:58:06 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	1fb883b72f	fix(write-path): give the semantic arm its own threshold + a payload floor ... Closes #2223. The write-path prior-art trigger's semantic arm shared auto-inject's 0.55 threshold, which was tuned on prose. Code embeddings sit on a much higher similarity floor — any two Python-shaped payloads share keywords, indentation and structure — so 0.55 landed INSIDE the noise band. Measured against the live instance: near-duplicate of a recorded helper 0.73-0.74 true positive unrelated colour math / Vue SFC / CSS 0.55-0.63 false positive `x = 1` 0.58 false positive 6 of 8 probe payloads produced a nudge; 4 were noise. The margin gate couldn't help — _AUTOINJECT_BAND is relative to the top hit, so with a single hit it never engages. Two gates are now the write-path arm's own: - kb_writepath_threshold, default 0.68 — above every measured false positive, still 0.05 below both true positives. Auto-inject keeps 0.55; it was tuned on prose and is not implicated. The comment this replaces explicitly reserved the split for when telemetry showed the surfaces wanted different values, so this is the change it described, not a reversal of it. - WRITEPATH_MIN_CODE_CHARS = 48 non-whitespace chars, below which the semantic arm doesn't run at all. Whitespace is excluded so a deeply indented one-liner can't pass on padding. 48 sits under the smallest plausible reusable helper (~60) and well over a degenerate edit, so it errs toward keeping recall — precision is the threshold's job. This is the cheap half of the operator's #89 idea; the full length<->threshold curve stays open there, since they asked to brainstorm it rather than have a scale invented for them. top_k stays shared — "how many titles at once" means the same thing on both surfaces. The existing tests were passing `code="x"` / `code="def f(): ..."` into the semantic arm, i.e. exactly the payloads the floor now drops, so the gate tests were never exercising a realistic payload. They now use a REAL_CODE fixture, plus new coverage for the floor (trivial payload, padding, place-arm unaffected, real helper passes) and a guard on the constant itself. Settings UI carries the new knob with the reasoning in its hint, and the write-path checkbox no longer claims it shares the threshold. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-07-29 23:26:59 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	2b85443dd1	feat(snippets): usage signal — was a surfaced record ever actually pulled? ... retrieval_logs answers "what did the ranker return, at what scores" — the right substrate for tuning a threshold. It cannot answer the question the snippet corpus actually needs: did anyone open this? A snippet nobody opens is not neutral. It takes a slot in every future auto-inject menu and crowds out something useful. Adds note_usage_events (migration 0071): one row per note per event, either 'surfaced' (we put its title in front of an agent) or 'pulled' (someone opened it in full), tagged with which surface produced it. Closes the gap #2082 recorded against this work. The write-path PLACE arm carries no score, so it has no home in retrieval_logs — folding it in would corrupt the score distribution that table exists to capture. The result was that the arm firing on the STRONGEST claim ("there is already a canonical helper in this exact file") was the one arm nobody could measure. Both arms now emit usage events under distinct sources, so their pull-through rates are finally comparable. Deliberate departures from the task as written: - Not in-session correlation. The original framing was "correlate result_ids against a later get_note in the same session." There is no session identity server-side — the MCP endpoint is stateless and the hooks send no session id — and adding one would mean threading an opaque client-supplied token through every read path. Two independent counters answer the question without it: surfaced 40×, pulled 0 is dead weight regardless of how those events distribute across sessions. - Pulls record at the ENTRY POINTS (MCP tools, REST detail route), not in snippets_svc.get_snippet, which update and merge also reach. Counting those would inflate precisely the number meant to say "someone chose to look at this." - get_note records for every note kind, not just snippets. The auto-inject menu surfaces tasks and processes too; scoping this to snippets would pin those at zero pulls forever and make them read as dead weight next to snippets that merely had a counter. Surfaced in the Snippets list as an "N/M used" badge, warning-toned once a record has been offered 3+ times and never opened, with the tooltip saying what to do about it (usually: its "when to reach for it" doesn't say when). No badge at all below one surfacing — "0/0" reads as a verdict when it's an absence of evidence. Also returned from MCP list_snippets so the agent can see dead weight without opening the UI. Telemetry keeps the retrieval_telemetry contract throughout: writes are fire-and-forget, reads degrade to zeroes, and no path can raise into the surface it observes. Refs #2085 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-07-28 18:09:17 -04:00
bvandeusen	e0328f2b1c	feat(plugin): write-path trigger — offer prior art before code is rewritten ... The milestone headline. Auto-inject fires on the operator's prompt; the moment reuse is actually lost is later, when the agent decides mid-task to write a helper. A PreToolUse hook on Write|Edit now fires there. Channel: `additionalContext` with NO permissionDecision, so the note reaches Claude beside the tool result and the write is never blocked — a recall aid must not be able to stop the operator's work. Plain stdout would have been invisible to the model, and deny/ask would have made a nudge into a gate. Two arms, different in kind: - BY PLACE — a snippet recorded at this path (or its directory) is prior art by definition, not resemblance, so it is neither scored nor thresholded. This is what #2083's reverse lookup was built to answer. - BY MEANING — semantic search restricted to snippets (new `note_type` filter on semantic_search_notes) over the code about to be written. Place ranks first; the top-k cap spans both arms. Gates carried over from milestone 93 verbatim: threshold, margin, session dedup, titles-never-bodies. Own `source='write_path'` in retrieval_logs so precision is tunable separately — the docstring records that the place arm is unlogged and hands that to #2085. Its own on/off in Settings but the SAME threshold/top-k: one "how loud may Scribe be" knob is easier to reason about than two that drift, and splitting them later is then a data-backed change rather than a guess. Details worth keeping: the hook sends a REPO-RELATIVE path because that is how locations are recorded; the git remote resolves to a project and is never used as the location `repo` filter (different namespaces, would silently match nothing); the endpoint stays a GET because a read-scoped API key cannot POST and every other hook depends on that. plugin.json 0.1.17 -> 0.1.18. Refs #2082, milestone #232.	2026-07-28 09:08:17 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	8977bed28d	feat(inject): label the record kind on each auto-inject menu line ... Every injected hit rendered identically, so a recorded snippet was indistinguishable from a stray dev-log in the one place prior art most needs to stand out. Each line now carries its kind — [snippet], [process], [task], [issue], [note] — and the header says "records" rather than "notes", which it can no longer claim. Task-ness wins over note_type in the marker: "there's an open issue about this" is the more useful thing to know at a glance. Still title-first: the marker is metadata already on the ORM object, so no extra query and no bodies (#2084). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RLwAaV4DQEmVyn496HnEvt	2026-07-27 15:18:03 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	ef1dbdfc86	feat(acl): unify the retrieval scopes; mark shared rows in Knowledge browse ... Closes #2092 and the Knowledge-browse provenance gap. The two halves of a hybrid search disagreed: the keyword half honoured shares while the semantic half was pinned to NoteEmbedding.user_id, so a shared record was findable by wording and invisible by meaning — the case a semantic search exists to serve. semantic_search_notes now scopes on Note via a `scope` parameter, and each of its five callers declares which kind of act it is: mcp/tools/search.py read the agent asked routes/search.py read the user typed it knowledge.py (semantic) read matches the keyword half beside it plugin_context.py browse nobody asked; never a one-to-one share dedup.py own a verdict that blocks a write must not hinge on another person's notes That last one is the reason this isn't a single global widening: the dedup gate returns "update the existing one instead", so matching a stranger's record would refuse a legitimate create and point at something the caller can't edit. Scope defaults to "own" so a caller that forgets is wrong in the safe direction, and an unknown scope raises rather than falling back — a typo there would be a data-exposure bug. Auto-inject keeps the browse scope, which still admits a collaborator's note via a shared project. Its menu line is the only provenance an agent sees, so a foreign hit now reads: #12 "Title" (0.71) - shared by alex, treat as a suggestion. MCP and REST search results carry shared/owner too. Knowledge browse: the feed hydrates cards from /api/knowledge/batch rather than the list route, so both paths label rows now, and KnowledgeView shows "by <owner>" on records the viewer doesn't own. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RLwAaV4DQEmVyn496HnEvt	2026-07-25 23:06:52 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	04b58ce01e	feat(acl): shared records are search-only and always labelled as someone else's ... Narrows the b7d6fc7 widening per the operator's call, and fixes a regression it introduced. Decision recorded as note 2094. Two scopes now, deliberately different: readable_notes_clause — everything the ACL permits, including records reached only via a direct/group note share. For EXPLICIT acts: a search the caller typed, a fetch by id. browsable_notes_clause — the caller's own records plus anything in a project they can reach. For PASSIVE surfaces: browse lists, facet counts, the process->skill manifest. The split is a trust boundary. Anything appearing unasked — in your own list, your own counts, or as a skill installed on your machine — reads as material you endorsed. A one-off someone shared with you hasn't earned that standing, so it waits until you go looking. This also dissolves the shared-Process problem by construction rather than by special case: the manifest is a passive surface, so a directly-shared Process is never installed as an auto-surfacing skill. Regression fix (#2093): b7d6fc7 widened the list queries but left the fetch path owner-only, so on the MCP path a record could be listed and then not opened — get_snippet raised not-found, get_process couldn't resolve, and the manifest emitted stubs whose get_process call would fail. snippets.get_snippet and notes.resolve_process now resolve the read scope. delete_snippet gained an explicit can_write_note guard, since being able to SEE a shared snippet must not imply being able to bin it. Provenance, so nothing arrives looking like the operator's own work: - access.describe_provenance / label_shared_items add shared/owner/permission; labelling costs no query when everything is the caller's own. - MCP: get_snippet, list_snippets, get_process and list_processes carry it, and get_process now says outright NOT to follow a shared process verbatim — its follow-as-written contract was the sharpest instance of the problem. - The skill stub for a shared Process names its author and asks for a go-ahead, instead of describing it as "the operator's saved Scribe process". - Policy stated once in the MCP _INSTRUCTIONS and the reusing-code skill: a shared record is that person's suggestion, weigh it, attribute it, ask before adopting it. - UI: shared snippets show "by <owner>" in the list and a notice above the code in the detail view, reusing SharedWithMeView's vocabulary. Plugin 0.1.15 -> 0.1.16 (skill text changed). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RLwAaV4DQEmVyn496HnEvt	2026-07-25 22:43:00 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.8	8126db3203	feat(plugin): knowledge auto-inject (Path A) — title-first per-turn awareness ... New UserPromptSubmit hook (scribe_autoinject.sh) + GET /api/plugin/retrieve that surface the TITLES (never bodies) of the few notes clearing four anti-bloat gates: a per-user confidence threshold (stricter than pull search), a margin gate, per-session dedup (exclude_ids), and a top-k ceiling. Each retrieval is logged to retrieval_logs as source=auto_inject so the threshold can be tuned from data. Per-user config (enable / threshold / top-k) is DB-backed via /api/settings with a Settings UI card; defaults enabled, threshold 0.55, top-k 3 (conservative — tune once auto_inject telemetry accrues). Scribe: project 2, milestone 93, task 1033. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Xz4j1H7pjYSjKsEpgcNH5E	2026-06-22 20:31:07 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.8	33f9a0a4d4	feat(plugin): Phase 4 — Scribe Processes auto-surface as local skills ... #755 Phase 4. Saved Scribe Processes (DRY pass, Drift Audit, …) now surface as auto-triggered Claude Code skills instead of pull-only get_process calls. Design correction vs the plan: stubs live in the USER's ~/.claude/skills/, NOT plugin/skills/_instance/. The plugin is git-cloned and identical per install, so instance-specific generated files can't ride in it; personal skills are live-detected within the session (verified via claude-code-guide). MCP prompts were the alternative but are pull-only (no relevance auto-surface), so skills are the right primitive. - backend: GET /api/plugin/processes manifest (services/plugin_context. build_process_manifest) — {name, slug, description} per Process; description is the auto-surface trigger (title + preview); slugs deduped, blanks skipped. - plugin: scribe_sync_processes.sh writes ~/.claude/skills/scribe-proc-<slug>/ SKILL.md (body = "call get_process(name), follow verbatim") and PRUNES stale scribe-proc-* stubs. Fail-open + silent; a transient fetch failure never wipes existing stubs. Runs as a 2nd SessionStart hook + via the /scribe:sync command. - plugin.json 0.1.7 → 0.1.8; README updated. - tests: build_process_manifest (render, slug dedupe, blank-title skip, preview truncation). Sync script's write+prune validated in isolation (plugin/** is not CI-covered): correct stubs created, stale pruned, unrelated skills untouched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-14 13:00:32 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.8	8fe571e175	feat(plugin): resolve session project from git remote, not a pinned project_id ... The SessionStart hook asked for a project_id via plugin userConfig, which pins one install to a single project — wrong for an operator working across many repos/projects. Resolve the active project server-side from the working repo's git remote instead (a stable identifier, not a dir-name guess). - repo_bindings table (migration 0064) + RepoBinding model: (user, repo_key) -> project, FKs CASCADE. - services/repo_bindings: normalize_repo_key collapses ssh/https/scp/creds/port/ .git to host/owner/repo; resolve/set/list/delete. - GET /api/plugin/context takes ?repo=<remote>; unbound repo -> a "bind this repo" hint with a ready bind_repo() call. project_id kept as manual override. - MCP tools: bind_repo / list_repo_bindings / unbind_repo. - Hook sends ?repo=$(git remote get-url origin) URL-encoded; all project_id handling removed. plugin.json drops the project_id userConfig (0.1.2 -> 0.1.3). - Tests: normalize equivalence classes + unbound-hint rendering. Refs task 755 (Scribe-as-plugin push channel). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-10 01:33:58 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.8	3ab16fcbdb	feat(plugin): add /api/plugin/context push-channel endpoint + dogfood hook ... Phase 1 of plan #755 (Scribe-as-plugin). Gives Scribe its own session-start push channel so always-on rules + active-project context surface without being asked — the gap behind 'I have to prompt for everything'. - services/plugin_context.build_session_context: renders always-on rule titles grouped by topic (under the 10k additionalContext cap; full text stays one list_always_on_rules/get_rule call away) + optional project goal/open-task count + a recall/update-over-create reflex line. Capped at 9000 chars. - routes/plugin GET /api/plugin/context (login_required already accepts Bearer fmcp_ keys; read scope suffices). - tests: titles-not-statements, project scoping, length cap (pure mocks). - scripts/scribe_session_context.sh: dogfood SessionStart hook, fail-open, reads url+token from .mcp.json. Superseded in Phase 2 by the plugin-bundled hook using userConfig. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-06-09 22:43:08 -04:00