Commit Graph
1 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 2e8d8461cc feat(settings): the two new retrieval bars get their controls (#3927)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 9s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 48s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 53s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m27s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 36s
#3852 and #3853 each added a threshold and neither added its input, so two
of the eleven retrieval settings were reachable only through the database.
The other nine have had UI all along.

That matters because the issue said otherwise. #3927 claimed none of the ten
appeared in the frontend, on the strength of a grep across `web/src` — a
directory this repo does not have. An empty result from a path that cannot
match was read as "no UI anywhere", and a rule-25 argument was written on top
of it. The issue is corrected rather than quietly rewritten: it is #3720's
defect, absence read as non-existence, committed while filing issues about
the product doing the same thing. A grep that returns nothing and a grep that
cannot match produce the same output, and only a positive control tells them
apart.

So this is small, which is the honest size:

- `kb_toolrule_threshold` — the command arm's bar. The hint says why it sits
  BELOW the write-path one rather than leaving that looking like a mistake: a
  shell command is short, so it scores lower for the same relevance, and at a
  shared bar this arm spoke on 2% of calls against the write path's 37%.
- `kb_promptrule_threshold` — the prompt boundary, a third query shape again,
  and the only moment that reaches a rule about how to ANSWER.

Both follow the five-site pattern the existing controls use: ref, clamp on
save, write-back, payload key, load. Separate keys, because the finding of
#3853 is that one number cannot serve arms whose queries differ in shape.

Also corrects copy that went stale this morning. The standing-rule hint still
said the arm surfaces "only rules marked conditional, since always-on ones
are already loaded" — describing a tier milestone 394 removed, on the surface
whose whole job is telling the operator what the bar does.

The guard is the part worth keeping. A form's initial value is a CLAIM about
the server's default, and nothing connected the two: retune the Python
constant and the input keeps rendering the old number, which the operator
reads as the bar in force. It pins the relationship across all five
thresholds, never the values, so retuning stays free as long as both move —
and it is falsified against a drifted form value.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011cPyzNnegXHr5iRMzzy5KJ
2026-09-11 20:30:06 -04:00