4 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusen	0d396de215	feat(snippets): record merge provenance on the survivor ... Merge kept the target's fields, unioned locations and tags, and trashed the sources — recording nothing about what it absorbed. If a variant handled an edge case the survivor doesn't, that difference left the visible record entirely; recovering it meant knowing to go digging in the trash. The survivor now carries `merged_from`: a "**Merged from:** #2, #3" line in the body for humans, and the same list in the `data` mirror for queries, written from one value like every other field (#2087). It accumulates rather than replaces — a target merged twice keeps both histories — and skipped sources (cross-owner, per #231) are excluded, so the record never claims to contain something it never absorbed. Ordinary edits carry it forward. update_snippet recomposes body and mirror from scratch, so an omission there would silently erase the history on the next unrelated edit; that path is pinned by its own test, including the pre-0070 case where the body line is the only copy. Surfaced in the snippet detail view as a "Merged from" row — the view renders parsed fields, not the raw body, so the body line alone would have been invisible to the operator (rule #27). Un-merge, the other half of #2087, stays open: restoring a source from trash still doesn't strip its locations off the survivor, and what partial un-merge should mean is a design question, not a coding one. `merged_from` is the record that makes it tractable. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RLwAaV4DQEmVyn496HnEvt	2026-07-27 15:23:41 -04:00
bvandeusen	04b58ce01e	feat(acl): shared records are search-only and always labelled as someone else's ... Narrows the b7d6fc7 widening per the operator's call, and fixes a regression it introduced. Decision recorded as note 2094. Two scopes now, deliberately different: readable_notes_clause — everything the ACL permits, including records reached only via a direct/group note share. For EXPLICIT acts: a search the caller typed, a fetch by id. browsable_notes_clause — the caller's own records plus anything in a project they can reach. For PASSIVE surfaces: browse lists, facet counts, the process->skill manifest. The split is a trust boundary. Anything appearing unasked — in your own list, your own counts, or as a skill installed on your machine — reads as material you endorsed. A one-off someone shared with you hasn't earned that standing, so it waits until you go looking. This also dissolves the shared-Process problem by construction rather than by special case: the manifest is a passive surface, so a directly-shared Process is never installed as an auto-surfacing skill. Regression fix (#2093): b7d6fc7 widened the list queries but left the fetch path owner-only, so on the MCP path a record could be listed and then not opened — get_snippet raised not-found, get_process couldn't resolve, and the manifest emitted stubs whose get_process call would fail. snippets.get_snippet and notes.resolve_process now resolve the read scope. delete_snippet gained an explicit can_write_note guard, since being able to SEE a shared snippet must not imply being able to bin it. Provenance, so nothing arrives looking like the operator's own work: - access.describe_provenance / label_shared_items add shared/owner/permission; labelling costs no query when everything is the caller's own. - MCP: get_snippet, list_snippets, get_process and list_processes carry it, and get_process now says outright NOT to follow a shared process verbatim — its follow-as-written contract was the sharpest instance of the problem. - The skill stub for a shared Process names its author and asks for a go-ahead, instead of describing it as "the operator's saved Scribe process". - Policy stated once in the MCP _INSTRUCTIONS and the reusing-code skill: a shared record is that person's suggestion, weigh it, attribute it, ask before adopting it. - UI: shared snippets show "by <owner>" in the list and a notice above the code in the detail view, reusing SharedWithMeView's vocabulary. Plugin 0.1.15 -> 0.1.16 (skill text changed). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RLwAaV4DQEmVyn496HnEvt	2026-07-25 22:43:00 -04:00
bvandeusen	7a81b7333e	feat(scribe): snippet merge UI — multi-select merge, repeatable locations ... Step 3 of the snippet-merge milestone (#231): the human surfaces for merge + multi-location, at v1 quality. Frontend: - SnippetListView: a Select mode (checkbox on each card) → a sticky action bar → a merge modal that lets you pick which selected snippet is the canonical (the others fold in and go to trash). Accent border on selected cards, Moss action buttons (Hybrid rule). - SnippetEditorView: the single Location fieldset becomes a repeatable locations list (add/remove rows), so editing a merged snippet no longer collapses its call sites — no data loss. Sends `locations`. - SnippetDetailView: renders every location (Location vs Locations label). - api/snippets.ts: SnippetLocation type, `locations` on fields/input, mergeSnippets(). Backend (editor enablement): - create_snippet service + POST route accept an optional `locations` list; PATCH route forwards `locations` — so the editor's location list works uniformly on create and edit. Single repo/path/symbol remain the one-location shorthand (MCP create contract unchanged). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Pa2EsuB54BuWQ8GfJq9c7t	2026-07-25 17:22:01 -04:00
bvandeusen	d257c0fd67	feat(scribe): snippet management UI + REST routes; embed snippets on create ... Step 6 of the Drafter recall milestone (#227): a human-facing surface for the reusable-code snippets that agents record via MCP, plus the REST API behind it. Backend embeds snippets inline on create/update so they're recallable immediately, not only after a restart. Backend: - routes/snippets.py: GET/POST /api/snippets, GET/PATCH/DELETE /api/snippets/<id>. Share-aware per rule #78 (get_note_for_user + can_write_note), writes performed as the owner; list owner-scoped — mirrors routes/notes.py. Registered in app.py. - services/snippets.py: embed on create/update via a _embed_snippet fire-and-forget helper, covering BOTH the MCP tool and the REST route by construction. A snippet's value is immediate recall, so it can't wait for the startup-only backfill (see issue: MCP create path doesn't embed inline for notes/tasks generally). - tests/test_routes_snippets.py: structural registration + handler/service contract + PATCH-field ↔ update_snippet-kwarg parity (rule #33). Frontend (Vue 3 + TS): - api/snippets.ts: typed client, modeled on api/systems.ts. - views: SnippetListView (search, skeleton/empty/error states), SnippetDetailView (read + copy-to-clipboard, ConfirmDialog delete), SnippetEditorView (create/edit all fields, Ctrl/Cmd+S, Esc, autofocus, validation). v1 quality per rules #24/#27. - router: /snippets, /snippets/new, /snippets/:id, /snippets/:id/edit. - NoteType union widened to include 'snippet'; Snippets nav link added to AppHeader (desktop pill bar + mobile menu). - Design system: Moss --color-action-primary for action buttons, accent --color-primary reserved for tags/brand (Hybrid rule); focus rings; JetBrains Mono for code/name/signature/location. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Pa2EsuB54BuWQ8GfJq9c7t	2026-07-25 14:16:02 -04:00