Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bvandeusen ef1dbdfc86 feat(acl): unify the retrieval scopes; mark shared rows in Knowledge browse
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 31s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 34s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 34s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Has been skipped
Closes #2092 and the Knowledge-browse provenance gap.

The two halves of a hybrid search disagreed: the keyword half honoured shares
while the semantic half was pinned to NoteEmbedding.user_id, so a shared record
was findable by wording and invisible by meaning — the case a semantic search
exists to serve. semantic_search_notes now scopes on Note via a `scope`
parameter, and each of its five callers declares which kind of act it is:

  mcp/tools/search.py     read    the agent asked
  routes/search.py        read    the user typed it
  knowledge.py (semantic) read    matches the keyword half beside it
  plugin_context.py       browse  nobody asked; never a one-to-one share
  dedup.py                own     a verdict that blocks a write must not hinge
                                  on another person's notes

That last one is the reason this isn't a single global widening: the dedup gate
returns "update the existing one instead", so matching a stranger's record would
refuse a legitimate create and point at something the caller can't edit. Scope
defaults to "own" so a caller that forgets is wrong in the safe direction, and an
unknown scope raises rather than falling back — a typo there would be a
data-exposure bug.

Auto-inject keeps the browse scope, which still admits a collaborator's note via
a shared project. Its menu line is the only provenance an agent sees, so a
foreign hit now reads: #12 "Title" (0.71) - shared by alex, treat as a
suggestion. MCP and REST search results carry shared/owner too.

Knowledge browse: the feed hydrates cards from /api/knowledge/batch rather than
the list route, so both paths label rows now, and KnowledgeView shows "by
<owner>" on records the viewer doesn't own.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RLwAaV4DQEmVyn496HnEvt
2026-07-25 23:06:52 -04:00
bvandeusen dd1fc2d506 feat(mcp): extend dedup gate to create_rule / create_project_rule
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 34s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 53s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 52s
Completes the Phase 5 follow-up: rules now get the same update-over-create
gate. Title-based only (rules aren't a semantic-retrieval/RAG surface), scoped
to the same topic (rulebook rule) or same project (project rule). force=true
overrides; fail-open like the note/task gate.

Deferred-item decisions (operator): REST/web gating SKIPPED (kept MCP-only —
humans rarely double-create and a hard block needs UI affordance); orphan scope
kept orphan↔orphan (no change). So this rule gate is the only remaining build.

- services/dedup.py: find_duplicate_rule(title, topic_id|project_id).
- create_rule + create_project_rule: force param + gate.
- tests: rule title match, scope-required guard, tool gate (block + force).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-14 13:43:17 -04:00
bvandeusen 5102ffb558 fix(dedup): fail open when the duplicate check can't run
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 33s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 50s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 56s
The Phase 5 gate added a DB query before every create_note/create_task. When
that query fails (DB unreachable, etc.) the create must NOT error — a dedup
check is advisory infrastructure, not a correctness gate. Wrap the title query
so any failure degrades to "no duplicate found" and the create proceeds.

Also fixes 7 existing create tests that don't mock the DB: they now exercise
the fail-open path (no Postgres in the unit-test job) instead of erroring.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-14 13:24:20 -04:00
bvandeusen 322cbc3b5e feat(mcp): Phase 5 — write-time near-duplicate gate (update-over-create)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 35s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 42s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Has been skipped
#755 Phase 5. create_note / create_task now BLOCK a near-duplicate instead of
silently inserting: they return {"duplicate": true, "existing_id", message}
pointing at the record to UPDATE. Fights store bloat and stale competing copies
that semantic search (RAG) would otherwise resurface for reconciliation. A
force=true override creates anyway for genuinely-distinct records.

- services/dedup.py: find_duplicate_note — two signals, scoped to owner + same
  project + same kind: (1) normalized-title exact match (cheap, always); (2)
  semantic cosine ≥ 0.90 but ONLY when body ≥ 200 chars (short/title-only
  embeddings false-positive — the pre-pivot lesson). Project-less (orphan)
  records compare only to other orphans on BOTH signals (orphan_only on the
  semantic call) — they're not matched across every project.
- Gate wired into the MCP create_note/create_task tools (the LLM write path)
  with force override; _INSTRUCTIONS documents the duplicate response + force.
- Opt-in by design: the service helper is only called from the interactive
  create tools. Internal/programmatic creates (recurrence spawn, imports) go
  straight through services.create_note and are NOT gated — a recurring task
  spawning its next same-titled instance must not be blocked.
- Scope v1: MCP tools only. REST/web (human CRUD, needs a UI affordance) and
  create_rule (not a RAG surface; _INSTRUCTIONS already steer it) are follow-ups.
- tests: dedup service (title/semantic/body-gate/type-filter) + tool gate
  (blocks, force bypasses) for notes and tasks.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-14 13:21:35 -04:00