4 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5 0f5ef0be63 rename(547): the server is grimoire — package, image, DB defaults, backups
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 12s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 56s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m4s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m55s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 44s
Step 2 of the Scribe -> Grimoire rename.

- src/scribe -> src/grimoire, and every import, patch target, module path,
  hypercorn entry point and `python -m grimoire.restore` with it; pyproject,
  uv.lock and the frontend package are named grimoire.
- Image git.fabledsword.com/bvandeusen/fabledgrimoire; CI's Postgres service
  runs as grimoire / grimoire_test.
- Compose files default the DB user, database and (prod) volume to grimoire,
  each overridable from .env, so an install created as Scribe keeps its data
  by setting POSTGRES_USER, POSTGRES_DB and PGDATA_VOLUME.
- Backups are written as grimoire-<ts>.tar with format grimoire-backup-tar.
  Archives named scribe-* with the scribe-backup-tar manifest still restore
  and are still counted at the destination (folder and S3), with tests.
- Exports, the MCP auth realm, the ASGI scope key and the persistent logger
  carry the new name.

Kept on purpose: the secret-sealing key label stays "scribe.secrets.v1",
because every stored secret was derived under it.

Plugin identity (plugin name, hooks, env vars, .scribe marker, skills) is
step 3.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-22 10:50:45 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5 914f31359c docs(6209): the remaining test files — lessons, reply moment and shape, retrieval specs and scopes, rule doors and judgments, services, snippets, search scope; five tests renamed to their property
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 5s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 17s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 57s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m19s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 2m2s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 15s
Docstrings, section headers and assertion messages drop the record number,
milestone or step that introduced the behaviour, and incident accounts are
restated as the present-tense failure shape. A dead pointer to a design doc
that is not in the repo is removed.

Renamed to the property they check:
  test_the_old_shape_would_be_caught -> test_a_rank_then_scope_query_is_caught
  test_a_ledger_repeat_no_longer_produces_that_case_at_all -> test_a_ledger_repeat_is_counted_not_withheld
  test_the_header_no_longer_promises_once_per_session -> test_the_header_explains_the_seen_marker
  test_the_portal_case_no_longer_stamps_one_canon_onto_a_whole_file -> test_one_canon_is_not_stamped_onto_a_whole_file
  test_the_repos_own_prose_no_longer_defines_with -> test_the_repos_own_prose_does_not_define_with
  test_the_original_regression_create_note_with_content -> test_the_real_server_refuses_content_on_create_note

Fixture and example ids stay: "note 5" in a supersession chain, "rule 156"
in an illustrative question, `#2275` as the hex-versus-citation case,
`#3244` as the example of a bare number, fixed dates in date-filter tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-21 21:44:58 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 ad4bd101db fix(tests): the stale-premise guard keys on the retired conclusion, not the quoted premise (#4134)
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 46s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 52s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m44s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 28s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01821k5B3Ysecp9fNYs92Kuy
2026-09-21 22:44:01 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 108b12eeb0 fix(dedup): a rule or preference create surfaces what it overlaps by meaning (#4134)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 14s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 1m16s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 56s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m4s
find_duplicate_rule was title-only, on the stated premise that rules are not
a semantic-retrieval surface - false since rules were embedded. A preference
restating a rule under another title passed untouched, and since both kinds
share one ranking, the weaker label could arrive alone.

find_overlapping_rules queries semantic_search_rules with the rule_document
shape, both kinds, in the scope the new record ranks in (global: every rule
the caller owns; project: global + that project). All three MCP create doors
call it before creating and return overlaps + overlap_note on the reply.

It advises rather than blocks, on measurement: across 16 sampled records the
nearest DISTINCT neighbour reached 0.853, while a true rewording scored 0.850.
No threshold separates the bands, so the floor (0.80) sits below the
restatement and the author judges. The stale docstring is corrected.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01821k5B3Ysecp9fNYs92Kuy
2026-09-21 22:39:02 -04:00