docs(6205): the remaining services files state the reason, not the instance that taught it

The 1-2 hit tail: access, background, backup, backup_job, canonical_systems,
design_stylesheet, forge_connections, moment_actions, notes, notifications,
placement, planning, platforms, projects, record_batch, recurrence,
report_check, retrieval_review, rule_scope, rule_versions, scheduler,
shape_check, supersession, system_rulings, system_usage, text, trash,
verification, version_pinning.

Also corrected while reading:
- backup.py said restore step 16 fills the System map; step 15 does.
- version_pinning.py pointed at a design doc that is not in the repo.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

src/scribe/services/access.py

@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ async def can_write_design_system(user_id: int, design_system_id: int) -> bool:
 # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 # Set-based visibility (for LIST queries)
 #
-# Two scopes, deliberately different (decision note 2094):
+# Two scopes, deliberately different:
 #
 #   readable_*  — everything the ACL permits, including a record reachable ONLY
 #                 through a direct or group note share. For EXPLICIT acts: a

src/scribe/services/background.py

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 The event loop holds only a WEAK reference to a task, so a bare
 ``create_task`` with no other holder can be garbage-collected mid-flight — a
-write that never errors and never lands (the #2663 GC footgun). This module is
+write that never errors and never lands. This module is
 the one place that gets the pattern right: strong references in ``_pending``,
 discarded on completion, with failures logged at WARNING instead of vanishing.
 
@@ -36,10 +36,10 @@ async def report_telemetry_failure(subsystem: str, site: str) -> None:
     WARNING to the process log every time; one AppLog error row per process per
     (subsystem, site) so the admin UI shows the outage without host access.
 
-    THIS IS NOT DECORATION. #2663 is the record of a telemetry subsystem running
+    THIS IS NOT DECORATION. A telemetry subsystem whose every failure goes to
-    at zero for weeks — every counter reading empty, indistinguishable from
+    ``logger.debug`` can run at zero — every counter reading empty,
-    "nobody uses this" — because every failure went to ``logger.debug``. A
+    indistinguishable from "nobody uses this". A subsystem whose failures are
-    subsystem whose failures are all invisible cannot report its own death.
+    all invisible cannot report its own death.
 
     The AppLog write is itself guarded: when the database is down it fails too,
     and that is fine. The WARNING already said so, and a canary must never take

src/scribe/services/backup.py

@@ -2781,7 +2781,7 @@ async def _restore_v2(data: dict) -> dict:
             session.add(event)
             stats["rule_usage_events"] += 1
 
-        # And the System twin, after the Systems (step 16 fills their map).
+        # And the System twin, after the Systems (step 15 fills their map).
         for ev in data.get("system_usage_events", []):
             event = _build_system_usage_event(ev, maps)
             if event is None:

src/scribe/services/backup_job.py

@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
 ONE APScheduler job (services/scheduler.py) fires at the top of every hour and
 reads the config at fire time: when backups are on and the hour is the chosen
 one, it runs. Reading at fire time rather than scheduling the chosen hour
-keeps the app's startup free of a database read (#4181 — a lifespan hook that
+keeps the app's startup free of a database read (a lifespan hook that waits
-waits on the database is a worker that never serves), and a changed hour
+on the database is a worker that never serves), and a changed hour
 needs no reschedule.
 
 A run exports the full backup, writes it as the dated tar
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ KEEP_RUNS = 30
 # room for one slow run, so a backup that lands at 02:40 instead of 02:05
 # does not flicker the page into a warning.
 STALE_AFTER = timedelta(hours=26)
-# The whole run's deadline (rule 156: a wait with no deadline is a bug). The
+# The whole run's deadline, because a wait with no deadline is a bug. The
 # S3 upload has its own 15-minute timeout, but a folder on a hung NFS mount
 # has none, and a run that never returns holds the lock — every later backup
 # would be skipped as "already running", silently, forever.

src/scribe/services/canonical_systems.py

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 """The global canonical area vocabulary, and the mapping from a project's
-Systems onto it (milestone 307 step 1, decision note 3026).
+Systems onto it.
 
 A `System` is per-project. Nothing outside a project can reference one, so a
 rule that spans projects has no way to say "this is about CI" without chaining
@@ -210,8 +210,8 @@ async def set_system_canonical(
     """Map (or unmap) one project System onto a catalog entry.
 
     Authorised by the PROJECT, not the catalog: mapping changes the project's
-    row, so project write access is the right gate (rule 78 — never a bare
+    row, so project write access is the right gate — never a bare owner
-    owner filter). Passing None clears the mapping.
+    filter. Passing None clears the mapping.
 
     Touches `canonical_id` and nothing else — the System's own name, charter
     and record associations are left exactly as they are.

src/scribe/services/design_stylesheet.py

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ with every new element, where a purpose name (`--action-primary`) is reused.
 SAFETY
 ------
 Values are interpolated into a stylesheet, and design systems are shareable
-records (rule #47). A value of `red; } body { display: none` in a system someone
+records. A value of `red; } body { display: none` in a system someone
 shared with you would otherwise inject CSS into your page. Everything rendered
 here is validated or dropped — never escaped-and-hoped.
 """
@@ -75,8 +75,8 @@ def selector_for_mode(mode: str, root_selector: str = ":root") -> str:
     attribute selector, matching the convention already in the codebase.
 
     The root selector is a PARAMETER because a container-scoped preview cannot
-    use `:root` — #251 recorded that mode scoping is one-way (light lives on
+    use `:root` — mode scoping is one-way (light lives on `:root`, dark layers
-    `:root`, dark layers over it), so a generator that hardcoded `:root` could
+    over it), so a generator that hardcoded `:root` could
     not serve a preview at all.
     """
     if mode == BASE_MODE:

src/scribe/services/forge_connections.py

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-"""User-level forge connection CRUD — the keyring rows get_forges reads (#2778).
+"""User-level forge connection CRUD — the keyring rows get_forges reads.
 
 A connection is a user's read-only credential for one forge host; one row per
 (user, host) keeps host-keyed resolution deterministic with no default-pointer

src/scribe/services/moment_actions.py

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-"""Which actions reach which moment: shipped defaults plus each install's own (milestone 458 step 2).
+"""Which actions reach which moment: shipped defaults plus each install's own.
 
 The catalog (`services/moments.py`) says what the moments ARE. This module says
 how the work gets there. One call can reach several moments: `kubectl apply`
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ COMMAND_TOOLS = frozenset({"bash"})
 # procedures' own.
 SKILL_TOOL, SKILL_FIELD = "skill", "skill"
 
-# A procedure also reaches the moment it is FOR (step 5): loading the
+# A procedure also reaches the moment it is FOR: loading the
 # reporting procedure is a report as surely as the reply that follows it.
 #
 # The product's own skills declare theirs in their SKILL.md frontmatter

src/scribe/services/notes.py

@@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ async def mark_note_verified(
     So a failed check leaves `verified_at` untouched and the note stays at the
     top of the sweep until someone actually deals with it.
 
-    Write access, not read (rules 47/78): stamping is a mutation, and an
+    Write access, not read: stamping is a mutation, and an
     editor-share holder may make it while a viewer may not.
 
     Returns None when the note is not found, not writable, or carries no

src/scribe/services/notifications.py

@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ async def send_invitation_email(email: str, invite_url: str, invited_by_username
 def utc_day_start(day: date) -> datetime:
     """Midnight UTC on `day`, as an AWARE datetime — the reminder dedup window.
 
-    Deliberately a `datetime` and not the bare `date` (#1727). Comparing a
+    Deliberately a `datetime` and not the bare `date`. Comparing a
     `timestamptz` column against a `date` does work, via an implicit cast — but
     Postgres resolves that cast in the SESSION's TimeZone, so the window would
     move with a server setting nobody remembers is load-bearing. An aware UTC
@@ -200,10 +200,9 @@ async def check_due_tasks() -> None:
                 # Dedup: check if we already sent a reminder today.
                 # `window_start` is an aware datetime, NOT `today.isoformat()`.
                 # asyncpg binds a str as VARCHAR and Postgres has no
-                # `timestamptz >= text` operator, so this raised on every run
+                # `timestamptz >= text` operator, so a string would raise on
-                # that got this far — swallowed by the per-user `except` below,
+                # every run — swallowed by the per-user `except` below, leaving
-                # which is why the only symptom was reminders silently never
+                # reminders silently never sending.
-                # sending plus an hourly traceback in the DB log (#1727).
                 dedup_result = await session.execute(
                     select(func.count(AppLog.id)).where(
                         AppLog.action == "task_reminder",

src/scribe/services/placement.py

@@ -1,13 +1,12 @@
 """Where a task sits — its project, its milestone, its step position, what is next.
 
-WHY THIS EXISTS (milestone 409 step 1)
+WHY THIS EXISTS
 
 An agent reporting finished work to the operator is asked to place it: which
 milestone, which step of how many, what comes next. Without those facts in
 hand it reconstructs them from memory, and a reconstruction reads exactly like
-the real thing while being wrong — the drafting of the feature note that
+the real thing while being wrong — an invented milestone title, a "next" step
-started this milestone invented a milestone title and named a "next" step that
+that is already done. So the facts come back on the write that changes a task,
-was already done. So the facts come back on the write that changes a task,
 where the report is about to be written, instead of being left to recall.
 
 THE SHAPE
@@ -57,7 +56,7 @@ from scribe.services import access as access_svc
 from scribe.services.milestones import OPEN_STEP_STATUSES, _progress_from_counts
 
 # Imported, not restated. The milestone summary names a plan's next open step
-# too (#4154), and the two answers must agree about what "open" means.
+# too, and the two answers must agree about what "open" means.
 _OPEN = OPEN_STEP_STATUSES
 
 logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)

src/scribe/services/planning.py

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ kind=plan task is retired going forward — start_planning never creates one.
 
 Steps passed up front are created in the SAME transaction as the milestone
 (services/record_batch.py), so the plan body and the steps can cite each other
-through `{{ref:N}}` placeholders instead of predicted ids (#4016).
+through `{{ref:N}}` placeholders instead of predicted ids.
 """
 from __future__ import annotations
 

src/scribe/services/platforms.py

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 """Platforms — what a project is built on or ships as, and which projects are
-which (milestone 463 step 2).
+which.
 
 Membership is what makes "is this idea in family for that project?" a lookup
 rather than a judgment: a family idea is for some platforms, and it reaches
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ async def set_project_platforms(
     user_id: int, project_id: int, updates: dict[str, str | None],
 ) -> list[dict]:
     """Apply a person's answers about a project's platforms. Write-gated on
-    the project (rule 78). Platforms not named are left exactly as they are.
+    the project. Platforms not named are left exactly as they are.
 
     Raises ValueError, naming the problem, on a malformed update, an unknown
     slug, or no write access — before anything is written, so the update

src/scribe/services/projects.py

@@ -132,19 +132,16 @@ async def get_project_summaries(
 ) -> dict[int, dict]:
     """Summaries for MANY projects — four queries and one session, total.
 
-    Replaces an `asyncio.gather` over the per-project version below, which was
+    Not an `asyncio.gather` over the per-project version below: that is a
-    a nested fan-out: each project opened its own session for three queries,
+    nested fan-out — each project opens its own session for three queries,
-    then called the milestone summary, which opened one more per milestone. For
+    then calls the milestone summary, which opens one more per milestone. For
-    25 projects that asked for roughly 250 pooled connections at once against a
+    a few dozen projects that asks for far more pooled connections than the
-    pool of 15 (SQLAlchemy's default 5 + 10 overflow), so most of them sat out
+    pool holds, so most of them sit out the checkout timeout and everything
-    the 30-second checkout timeout and everything else on the instance queued
+    else on the instance queues behind them, unrelated routes included.
-    behind them — including unrelated routes, which is why /api/settings
-    returned 500 while /api/projects took 30.9s (#2384).
 
-    The comment it replaced said "one backend pass instead of N+1 frontend
+    Moving an N+1 from the browser to the server does not remove it; it moves
-    calls". It did remove the N+1 from the network — and recreated it against
+    it onto the connection pool, where it is worse — the browser at least
-    the connection pool, where it is worse: the browser had at least been
+    serialises its calls.
-    serialising those calls.
     """
     if not project_ids:
         return {}

src/scribe/services/record_batch.py

@@ -1,9 +1,8 @@
 """Create several records at once, so they can cite each other without guessing ids.
 
-Why this exists is in services/record_refs.py (#4016): a session that needs
+Why this exists is in services/record_refs.py: a session that creates records
-records to reference one another used to create them one by one and predict
+one by one and predicts the ids of the ones not yet made loses those numbers
-the ids of the ones not yet made — and any concurrent create, from any session
+to any concurrent create, from any session or any user.
-or any user, took those numbers.
 
 Here the whole batch is ONE transaction: insert every record, flush so the
 sequence assigns the real ids, rewrite each `{{ref:N}}` with the id and title
@@ -128,7 +127,7 @@ async def create_batch(
         project_id = existing.project_id
     if milestone is not None and not project_id:
         raise ValueError("a new milestone needs a project_id")
-    # Share-aware (rule 78): a collaborator with write access to a shared
+    # Share-aware: a collaborator with write access to a shared
     # project may plan in it; a bare owner filter would refuse them.
     if project_id and not await access_svc.can_write_project(user_id, project_id):
         raise ValueError(f"project {project_id} not found")

src/scribe/services/recurrence.py

@@ -138,8 +138,7 @@ async def spawn_recurring_tasks() -> int:
                 recurrence_rule=task.recurrence_rule,
             )
             # No explicit embed here: create_note calls embed_note itself, so
-            # the spawn path stopped being a second copy of the embedding rule
+            # the spawn path is not a second copy of the embedding rule.
-            # the moment that moved into the service (#2056, #280).
         except Exception:
             logger.exception("Failed to spawn recurring task %d", task.id)
             continue

src/scribe/services/report_check.py

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 """The report-shape check: does a reply that closed a task carry the completion
 sections, and what is it sent back with when it does not.
 
-WHY THIS EXISTS (milestone 409 step 5)
+WHY THIS EXISTS
 
 Everything that helps an agent write a readable completion report arrives
 BEFORE the reply is written. The Stop hook is the one moment the finished reply
@@ -13,13 +13,10 @@ exists, so a reply that closed a task is checked for the completion sections
   - OWNING THE WORDS the agent is sent back with, so every client's hook says
     the same thing (plugin/PACKAGING.md: hooks carry timing and transport).
 
-ONE END-OF-TURN REQUEST (milestone 500 step 4). This used to be a Stop hook of
+ONE END-OF-TURN REQUEST. The Stop hook sends the reply once, with the ids of
-its own that checked the sections in shell and reported here; the reply-moment
+the tasks the turn closed, and the section check runs here beside the reply
-check sent the same reply to `/reply-rules` a moment later. The hook now sends
+hold. The patterns match the words that carry the meaning rather than exact
-the reply once, with the ids of the tasks the turn closed, and the section
+headings, so a shape's wording can change without breaking this.
-check runs here beside the reply hold. The patterns are the ones the shell
-used, matched on the words that carry the meaning rather than exact headings,
-so a shape's wording can change without breaking this.
 
 app_logs rather than a table of its own: one small event with a JSON detail is
 what that table holds, it already has retention and an admin viewer, and

src/scribe/services/retrieval_review.py

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-"""Judging what a retrieval arm offered — the review pass (#4772).
+"""Judging what a retrieval arm offered — the review pass.
 
 The usage tables record what the reader DID with a line: opened it or not.
-Since every menu line carries its matched passage (#4364), that action no
+Because every menu line carries its matched passage, that action does not
-longer stands in for relevance — a line can be unrelated, related and enough
+stand in for relevance — a line can be unrelated, related and enough
 as shown, related and already in context, or related and ignored, and all four
 are "not opened". Only someone reading the query beside the line can tell
 them apart. This module is how that reading gets done and kept.

src/scribe/services/rule_scope.py

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-"""Which rules a caller may be shown — a rule's HOME, stated once (milestone 414).
+"""Which rules a caller may be shown — a rule's HOME, stated once.
 
 A rule lives in a rulebook topic — GLOBAL, it applies wherever its owner
 works — or on one project, where it applies to that project and nowhere else.
@@ -13,9 +13,8 @@ home, so it is answered here and nowhere else:
 - `everywhere=True`: every rule the caller owns, in any home — the explicit
   whole-rulebook question.
 
-It was written inline in `semantic_search_rules` until the moment lookup
+Rule search and the moment lookup both need this answer. Two copies of a
-(milestone 458) needed the same answer. Two copies of a scope clause is how
+scope clause is how one of them starts surfacing another project's rules.
-one of them starts surfacing another project's rules, so it moved here first.
 """
 from __future__ import annotations
 

src/scribe/services/rule_versions.py

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ lifecycle: a soft delete keeps the rule row whole and restorable, so there is
 nothing to preserve at delete time, and anything that outlived a purge would be
 data the operator explicitly asked to be gone.
 
-WHAT IS DELIBERATELY NOT COPIED FROM note_versions (milestone 323). Both of its
+WHAT IS DELIBERATELY NOT COPIED FROM note_versions. Both of its
 guards defend against note autosave, which fires every 60 seconds and would
 otherwise burn every slot. Rules have no autosave — every version here comes
 from a deliberate `update_rule` — so both guards would only ever discard a real

src/scribe/services/scheduler.py

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-"""One APScheduler job bridged into the asyncio loop — the shape the four
+"""One APScheduler job bridged into the asyncio loop — the shape the
 *_scheduler modules (recurrence spawn, auto-pin scan, trash purge, DB
-maintenance) each used to carry a private copy of.
+maintenance) share instead of each carrying a private copy.
 
 APScheduler's BackgroundScheduler fires from a worker thread; the work is
 async and must run on the app's loop, so the fire is bridged with

src/scribe/services/shape_check.py

@@ -1,15 +1,14 @@
 """The end-of-turn shape check: what a turn wrote that nobody has judged, and what the agent is asked.
 
-WHY THIS EXISTS (milestone 439)
+WHY THIS EXISTS
 
-The shape ledger used to be filled by machinery: extraction found the
+The agent that WROTE the code is the one participant who knows what it is.
-definitions, framework rules decided which were one-offs, and the write-path
+Machinery can find definitions and stamp "instance of #N", but it cannot say
-hook stamped "instance of #N" with nobody reading. The agent that WROTE the
+that a first instance is a reusable piece — and a piece never recorded is
-code — the one participant who knows what it is — was asked only in an audit,
+rebuilt by the next session. An audit run later asks too late, if anyone runs
-weeks later, if anyone ran one. A first instance of a reusable piece was never
+one.
-asked about at all, so it was never recorded, and the next session rebuilt it.
 
-So the question moves to the moment the knowledge exists. The client's write
+So the question is asked at the moment the knowledge exists. The client's write
 hooks keep a ledger of the definitions each turn wrote; its Stop hook sends
 them here at the end of the turn. Two jobs live on this side, as with the
 report check (services/report_check.py):
@@ -66,7 +65,7 @@ def _evidence_note(evidence: dict) -> str:
 def block_reason(unjudged: list[dict], *, project_id: int, repo: str) -> str:
     """What the agent is told at the end of a turn that wrote unjudged shapes.
 
-    Phrased as the practice wanted (note #3565): what to decide and the one
+    Phrased as a practice: what to decide and the one
     call that records it, not a prohibition. The reusing-code skill owns the
     longer version of what each verdict means.
     """

src/scribe/services/supersession.py

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 """Which records have been overtaken by which — the claim, not the ranking.
 
-Step 2 of milestone #278. This module only records and reads the relation; the
+This module only records and reads the relation; the
 demotion that makes it matter lives in the retrieval layer.
 
 WHY THE CLAIM POINTS FORWARD
@@ -202,8 +202,8 @@ async def attach_relations(user_id: int, note_id: int, data: dict, *, hint: bool
     acted on confidently, which is worse than never surfacing it.
 
     Omitted entirely when empty, so an ordinary note's payload doesn't grow
-    two permanently-empty lists (#2483 — a field that always says nothing
+    two permanently-empty lists — a field that always says nothing trains
-    trains readers to skip fields). `hint=True` (the agent surface) also
+    readers to skip fields. `hint=True` (the agent surface) also
     attaches `superseded_note`, the one-sentence reading instruction.
     """
     rel = await get_relations(user_id, note_id)

src/scribe/services/system_rulings.py

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-"""An area's rulings, delivered when its files are touched (milestone 444).
+"""An area's rulings, delivered when its files are touched.
 
 A RULING is the operator's decision about how one area of the work must behave.
 It lives in a `Rulings` section at the end of the area's System description
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ patterns or it does not. It takes no budget and no floor from the retrieval
 arms beside it, and writes no retrieval_logs row — there is no score
 distribution for it to join. Its surfacings go to `system_usage_events`.
 
-ONCE IN FULL, THEN A REFERENCE (the #3750 shape). The hook keeps the Systems
+ONCE IN FULL, THEN A REFERENCE. The hook keeps the Systems
 already shown this session and passes them back; a repeat renders as one short
 line rather than the rulings again, and is not counted as a surfacing.
 

src/scribe/services/system_usage.py

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 """System usage telemetry — were an area's rulings read once shown?
 
-The twin of `note_usage` and `rule_usage` for Systems (milestone 444). The
+The twin of `note_usage` and `rule_usage` for Systems. The
 rulings arm shows a System's rulings when a command or edit touches the
 System's files; a pull is somebody then opening the System (`get_system`). The
 ratio says whether delivering rulings by path earns its line.
@@ -97,8 +97,7 @@ async def usage_for_systems(system_ids: list[int]) -> dict[int, dict]:
     One GROUP BY for the whole list, never a query per row — this decorates a
     list view. Systems with no events come back as `empty_system_usage()`.
     Fails open: a readout that could break the Systems list is worse than a
-    zero, but the failure is reported so the zero is not mistaken for silence
+    zero, but the failure is reported so the zero is not mistaken for silence.
-    (#2663).
     """
     ids = [int(s) for s in system_ids]
     out: dict[int, dict] = {sid: empty_system_usage() for sid in ids}

src/scribe/services/text.py

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ def elide(text: str, budget: int) -> tuple[str, bool]:
 
     This is the fallback, not the goal. Where the system knows WHICH span of a
     record is the relevant one — a semantic search knows exactly that, and
-    stores it (#4243) — show that span and say so. Reach for this only when
+    stores it — show that span and say so. Reach for this only when
     nothing identifies a better part than "all of it".
     """
     if budget <= 0 or len(text) <= budget:
@@ -41,11 +41,9 @@ def elide(text: str, budget: int) -> tuple[str, bool]:
 # What a search result shows a reader, as one decision made in one place.
 #
 # Every door onto a semantic search faces the same question — which span of a
-# record do I show someone deciding whether to open it? — and each used to
+# record do I show someone deciding whether to open it? A bare head cut shows
-# answer it separately with a bare head cut of a different length: 240
-# characters in the MCP search, 200 in the web's knowledge search. Both showed
 # the document's OPENING, which is not the span that matched and not the span
-# the ranking was built on.
+# the ranking was built on, and a cut per door gives each a different answer.
 #
 # Doors keep their own field names (the web UI renders `snippet`, the MCP
 # surface returns `excerpt`), because renaming a field a frontend consumes is

src/scribe/services/trash.py

@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ async def restore_entity(user_id: int, entity_type: str, entity_id: int) -> int
 
     The inverse of `delete(user_id, entity_type, entity_id)`, which returns a
     batch id the caller usually doesn't keep. Callers that need to undo their own
-    soft-delete later — snippet un-merge (#2165) — know the entity id, not the
+    soft-delete later — snippet un-merge — know the entity id, not the
     batch, and looking it up here keeps them from reaching into the column set.
 
     Restores the whole batch on purpose, not just the row: the batch is the

src/scribe/services/verification.py

@@ -1,11 +1,10 @@
 """What a record's own check MEANS — shared by rules and notes.
 
 Two record types carry `verify_with` / `expires_when` / `verified_at`: rules
-(milestone 312) and notes (milestone 317). What they share is BEHAVIOUR — how
+and notes. What they share is BEHAVIOUR — how a stamp is read, how old it is,
-a stamp is read, how old it is, what "never" means — not storage and not the
+what "never" means — not storage and not the query. The two sweeps stay
-query. Note 3163 is the rule this file is an instance of: `semantic_search_*`
+separate siblings, because a rule scopes by rulebook ownership and a note
-could never have been shared between them because a rule scopes by rulebook
+scopes by the note ACL.
-ownership and a note scopes by the note ACL, so the two sweeps are siblings.
 These functions are the part that genuinely is common, factored so it exists
 once rather than twice.
 

src/scribe/services/version_pinning.py

@@ -8,8 +8,6 @@ Tiers (pin_kind values):
   None     → rolling autosave; capped at MAX_VERSIONS, FIFO.
   "auto"   → system-declared via the stability scan; capped at MAX_AUTO_PINS, FIFO.
   "manual" → user-declared; unlimited, never pruned.
-
-Design: docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-13-note-version-pinning-design.md
 """
 from __future__ import annotations