fix(rules): the staleness signal must not wait for prior art to match (#3244)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 12s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 24s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 32s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 52s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped

CI caught two things, and the first is the feature not working rather than a
test being wrong.

THE SIGNAL WAS GATED ON A COINCIDENCE. build_write_path_hint returns early
when no prior art, stamp, divergence or derive matched, and that guard sat
ABOVE the new arm — so a session whose rules had changed was told only if the
file it happened to be editing also matched something else. A staleness
signal that fires on that coincidence is not a staleness signal. The arm now
runs above the guard, collecting into its own list that `lines` is seeded
from, and the guard accounts for it.

The standing-rule arm (milestone 307) is deliberately LEFT below that guard,
and this is a finding rather than a fix: it has the same gating and probably
should not, but it runs a SEMANTIC search, so lifting it would put an
embedding query on every write in every session. That is a cost decision, not
a bug fix, and not this task's to make.

THE MARKER MUST NOT BREAK THE PAYLOAD IT DECORATES. rules_etag is computed on
the SessionStart path, where `max()` raising costs the whole context payload
— every rule title, the project, all of it — to save a hint. A row with no
usable timestamp is now skipped and a set with none degrades to a count-only
marker, which still catches a rule added or deleted and only loses edits.
That is the right way round to lose information. CI found it because
build_session_context's tests pass MagicMock rules and `max()` over those
raises TypeError.

Also: list_always_on_rules on an install with no always-on rulebooks returns
`rules_etag: "empty|0"`. Its exact-dict test is updated rather than loosened
— the key being present on an empty install is the behaviour, not noise.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-30 13:10:04 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 5c9bb40777
commit efabba58dd
11 changed files with 296 additions and 77 deletions
+8 -2
View File
@@ -137,11 +137,17 @@ async def delete_milestone(milestone_id: int) -> dict:
"""Move a milestone to the trash (recoverable). Its tasks go with it as one batch.
Restore via restore(batch_id)."""
uid = current_user_id()
# Read the title BEFORE the delete: afterwards the row is trashed and the
# confirmation could only echo the number back. A deletion the operator
# cannot recognise is one they cannot tell was the wrong one.
doomed = await milestones_svc.get_milestone(uid, milestone_id)
title = getattr(doomed, "title", "") if doomed else ""
batch = await trash_svc.delete(uid, "milestone", milestone_id)
if batch is None:
raise ValueError(f"milestone {milestone_id} not found")
return {"deleted_batch_id": batch,
"message": f"Milestone {milestone_id} + its tasks moved to trash. Restore with restore('{batch}')."}
return {"deleted": milestone_id, "title": title, "deleted_batch_id": batch,
"message": f'Milestone {milestone_id} ("{title}") and its tasks '
f"moved to trash. Restore with restore('{batch}')."}
def register(mcp) -> None:
+8 -2
View File
@@ -324,11 +324,17 @@ async def find_duplicate_records(kind: str = "note", threshold: float = 0.0) ->
async def delete_note(note_id: int) -> dict:
"""Move a Scribe note to the trash (recoverable). Restore via restore(batch_id)."""
uid = current_user_id()
# Read the title BEFORE the delete: afterwards the row is trashed and the
# confirmation could only echo the number back. A deletion the operator
# cannot recognise is one they cannot tell was the wrong one.
loaded = await notes_svc.get_note_for_user(uid, note_id)
title = getattr(loaded[0], "title", "") if loaded else ""
batch = await trash_svc.delete(uid, "note", note_id)
if batch is None:
raise ValueError(f"note {note_id} not found")
return {"deleted_batch_id": batch,
"message": f"Note {note_id} moved to trash. Restore with restore('{batch}')."}
return {"deleted": note_id, "title": title, "deleted_batch_id": batch,
"message": f'Note {note_id} ("{title}") moved to trash. '
f"Restore with restore('{batch}')."}
async def notes_due_for_verification(
+11 -6
View File
@@ -122,8 +122,9 @@ async def delete_rulebook(rulebook_id: int, confirmed: bool = False) -> dict:
"confirmed_required": True,
}
batch = await trash_svc.delete(uid, "rulebook", rulebook_id)
return {"deleted": rulebook_id, "deleted_batch_id": batch,
"message": f"Moved to trash. Restore with restore('{batch}')."}
return {"deleted": rulebook_id, "title": rb.title, "deleted_batch_id": batch,
"message": f'Rulebook {rulebook_id} ("{rb.title}") moved to trash. '
f"Restore with restore('{batch}')."}
# ── Topic CRUD ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
@@ -192,8 +193,9 @@ async def delete_topic(topic_id: int, confirmed: bool = False) -> dict:
"confirmed_required": True,
}
batch = await trash_svc.delete(uid, "topic", topic_id)
return {"deleted": topic_id, "deleted_batch_id": batch,
"message": f"Moved to trash. Restore with restore('{batch}')."}
return {"deleted": topic_id, "title": topic.title, "deleted_batch_id": batch,
"message": f'Topic {topic_id} ("{topic.title}") moved to trash. '
f"Restore with restore('{batch}')."}
# ── Rule CRUD ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
@@ -602,8 +604,10 @@ async def rule_history(rule_id: int, version_id: int = 0) -> dict:
versions = await rulebooks_svc.list_rule_versions(rule_id, uid)
if versions is None:
raise ValueError(f"rule {rule_id} not found")
rule = await rulebooks_svc.get_rule(rule_id, uid)
return {
"rule_id": rule_id,
"title": rule.title if rule else "",
"versions": [v.to_dict(include_text=False) for v in versions],
"total": len(versions),
# Said in-band because an empty list is the ordinary case and reads
@@ -632,8 +636,9 @@ async def delete_rule(rule_id: int, confirmed: bool = False) -> dict:
"confirmed_required": True,
}
batch = await trash_svc.delete(uid, "rule", rule_id)
return {"deleted": rule_id, "deleted_batch_id": batch,
"message": f"Moved to trash. Restore with restore('{batch}')."}
return {"deleted": rule_id, "title": rule.title, "deleted_batch_id": batch,
"message": f'Rule {rule_id} ("{rule.title}") moved to trash. '
f"Restore with restore('{batch}')."}
# ── Subscriptions ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+5 -1
View File
@@ -494,9 +494,13 @@ async def delete_snippet(snippet_id: int) -> dict:
that should survive, prefer merge_snippets — that keeps the call sites.
"""
uid = current_user_id()
# Read before deleting so the confirmation can NAME what went — an id
# alone leaves the operator unable to tell which snippet this was.
doomed = await snippets_svc.get_snippet(uid, snippet_id)
title = getattr(doomed, "title", "") if doomed else ""
if not await snippets_svc.delete_snippet(uid, snippet_id):
raise ValueError(f"snippet {snippet_id} not found")
return {"deleted": True, "id": snippet_id}
return {"deleted": True, "id": snippet_id, "title": title}
async def merge_snippets(target_id: int, source_ids: list[int]) -> dict:
+8 -2
View File
@@ -364,11 +364,17 @@ async def delete_task(task_id: int) -> dict:
"""Move a Scribe task (or plan) to the trash (recoverable). Sub-tasks go with it.
Restore via restore(batch_id)."""
uid = current_user_id()
# Read the title BEFORE the delete: afterwards the row is trashed and the
# confirmation could only echo the number back. A deletion the operator
# cannot recognise is one they cannot tell was the wrong one.
loaded = await notes_svc.get_note_for_user(uid, task_id)
title = getattr(loaded[0], "title", "") if loaded else ""
batch = await trash_svc.delete(uid, "task", task_id)
if batch is None:
raise ValueError(f"task {task_id} not found")
return {"deleted_batch_id": batch,
"message": f"Task {task_id} moved to trash. Restore with restore('{batch}')."}
return {"deleted": task_id, "title": title, "deleted_batch_id": batch,
"message": f'Task {task_id} ("{title}") moved to trash. '
f"Restore with restore('{batch}')."}
def register(mcp) -> None:
+71 -59
View File
@@ -952,7 +952,74 @@ async def build_write_path_hint(
derive = [d for d in found if d.get("key") not in skip]
except Exception:
logger.warning("write-time derive check failed", exc_info=True)
if not synced and not menu and not stamped and not divergence and not derive:
staleness: list[str] = []
# ── Have the rules moved under this session? (milestone 323) ───────
#
# THE CARRIER IS THE POINT. This hook already fires before a write — the
# moment acting on a stale rule actually costs something — and the check
# is one comparison against a marker the session already holds. No
# payload, no extra round trip, and nothing said when nothing moved.
#
# WHAT THIS CANNOT SEE, and a reader who finds an etag here will assume
# otherwise:
#
# what goes wrong | caught?
# ---------------------------------------------------|--------
# another session edits a rule mid-flight | yes
# the session is misremembering a rule read hours ago | yes
# compaction summarised the rules out of context | NO
#
# The third is the most common and this is blind to it: the etag was in
# context too and went with the rules. The SessionStart nudge is that
# case's only mechanism and must not be softened because this shipped.
#
# Fails open, like every other arm here: a staleness hint must never
# break a write.
if rules_etag:
try:
current = await rulebooks_svc.list_always_on_rules(
user_id, project_id=project_id or 0,
)
if rulebooks_svc.rules_etag(current) != rules_etag:
moved = rulebooks_svc.rules_moved_since(current, rules_etag)
held = rulebooks_svc.etag_count(rules_etag)
bits = []
if moved:
named = ", ".join(
f"#{r.id} \u201c{r.title}\u201d" for r in moved[:3]
)
more = len(moved) - 3
bits.append(
f"{named}" + (f", and {more} more" if more > 0 else "")
)
# A DELETED rule moves no timestamp and leaves no row to name,
# so the count is the only thing that can report the one change
# that takes an instruction OUT of force.
if held is not None and held != len(current):
delta = len(current) - held
bits.append(
f"{abs(delta)} rule(s) {'added' if delta > 0 else 'no longer in force'}"
)
if bits:
staleness.append(
"Your loaded rules have changed since this session "
"started — " + "; ".join(bits) + ". Re-read them with "
"list_always_on_rules() before relying on the set you "
"are holding."
)
except Exception:
logger.debug("write-path rules-etag arm failed", exc_info=True)
# The guard sits BELOW the staleness arm on purpose. A rules change is
# unconditional news — it does not become less true because this
# particular write happened to match no prior art — and this arm is one
# indexed query, only when the session actually sent a marker.
#
# The standing-rule arm further down is deliberately left on the far side
# of this guard: that one runs a SEMANTIC search, and moving it here would
# run an embedding query on every write in the session. Its gating is a
# separate question from this one (see the note on #3244).
if not staleness and not synced and not menu and not stamped and not divergence and not derive:
return empty
owners = await owner_names_for({
@@ -971,7 +1038,9 @@ async def build_write_path_hint(
for marker, item in menu:
rendered.append((item, marker, _owner_of(item), _foreign_language(item, target_lang)))
lines: list[str] = []
# Seeded with the staleness line, which is decided above the early
# return and so cannot wait for this list to exist.
lines: list[str] = list(staleness)
sync_note_ids: list[int] = []
if synced:
# The sync framing (#2708). Deliberately imperative about the record —
@@ -1039,63 +1108,6 @@ async def build_write_path_hint(
for arm, ids in by_arm.items():
record_surfaced(user_id=user_id, note_ids=ids, source=arm)
# ── Have the rules moved under this session? (milestone 323) ───────
#
# THE CARRIER IS THE POINT. This hook already fires before a write — the
# moment acting on a stale rule actually costs something — and the check
# is one comparison against a marker the session already holds. No
# payload, no extra round trip, and nothing said when nothing moved.
#
# WHAT THIS CANNOT SEE, and a reader who finds an etag here will assume
# otherwise:
#
# what goes wrong | caught?
# ---------------------------------------------------|--------
# another session edits a rule mid-flight | yes
# the session is misremembering a rule read hours ago | yes
# compaction summarised the rules out of context | NO
#
# The third is the most common and this is blind to it: the etag was in
# context too and went with the rules. The SessionStart nudge is that
# case's only mechanism and must not be softened because this shipped.
#
# Fails open, like every other arm here: a staleness hint must never
# break a write.
if rules_etag:
try:
current = await rulebooks_svc.list_always_on_rules(
user_id, project_id=project_id or 0,
)
if rulebooks_svc.rules_etag(current) != rules_etag:
moved = rulebooks_svc.rules_moved_since(current, rules_etag)
held = rulebooks_svc.etag_count(rules_etag)
bits = []
if moved:
named = ", ".join(
f"#{r.id} \u201c{r.title}\u201d" for r in moved[:3]
)
more = len(moved) - 3
bits.append(
f"{named}" + (f", and {more} more" if more > 0 else "")
)
# A DELETED rule moves no timestamp and leaves no row to name,
# so the count is the only thing that can report the one change
# that takes an instruction OUT of force.
if held is not None and held != len(current):
delta = len(current) - held
bits.append(
f"{abs(delta)} rule(s) {'added' if delta > 0 else 'no longer in force'}"
)
if bits:
lines.append(
"Your loaded rules have changed since this session "
"started — " + "; ".join(bits) + ". Re-read them with "
"list_always_on_rules() before relying on the set you "
"are holding."
)
except Exception:
logger.debug("write-path rules-etag arm failed", exc_info=True)
# ── Standing rules that may apply here (milestone 307) ──────────────
#
# A SUGGESTION, not a binding surface, and the distinction is the design
+14 -2
View File
@@ -1449,8 +1449,20 @@ def rules_etag(rules: list) -> str:
"""
if not rules:
return _ETAG_EMPTY
newest = max(r.updated_at for r in rules)
return f"{newest.isoformat()}|{len(rules)}"
# A decoration must not be able to break what it decorates. This is
# computed on the SessionStart path, where raising would cost the whole
# context payload to save a hint — so a row with no usable timestamp is
# skipped rather than compared, and a set with none degrades to a
# count-only marker instead of failing. Count-only still catches a rule
# added or deleted; it just cannot see an edit, which is the right way
# round to lose information.
stamps = [
r.updated_at for r in rules
if isinstance(getattr(r, "updated_at", None), datetime)
]
if not stamps:
return f"unknown|{len(rules)}"
return f"{max(stamps).isoformat()}|{len(rules)}"
async def rules_etag_for(user_id: int, project_id: int = 0) -> str: