diff --git a/plugin/.claude-plugin/plugin.json b/plugin/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
index 1d30bdb..a33665e 100644
--- a/plugin/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
+++ b/plugin/.claude-plugin/plugin.json
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "scribe",
   "description": "Scribe for Claude Code: connects the scribe MCP server, adds the hooks that deliver live project state and relevant records at the right moment, ships the shared client-neutral Scribe skills (using-scribe, writing-plans, reporting-back, systematic-debugging, verification, brainstorming, reusing-code, shape-accounting), and syncs your saved Scribe Processes as skills (/scribe:sync).",
-  "version": "2026.09.24.1358",
+  "version": "2026.10.01.0326",
   "author": {
     "name": "Bryan Van Deusen"
   },
diff --git a/plugin/skills/shape-accounting/SKILL.md b/plugin/skills/shape-accounting/SKILL.md
index c1e7b1c..740ebe7 100644
--- a/plugin/skills/shape-accounting/SKILL.md
+++ b/plugin/skills/shape-accounting/SKILL.md
@@ -152,6 +152,12 @@ Three questions the ledger answers mechanically (#2793):
 - **Recheck** — `list_shapes(project_id, flag="recheck")`: judged
   instances/variants whose body changed since judged. The judgment stands;
   re-confirm it (classify again with the same status) or re-judge.
+- **Weak stamps** — the coverage line's "N weak stamps … to judge —
+  stamps_to_review": rows the write-path hook asserted, unattended, on a
+  resemblance below today's floor. They no longer elect a directory's canon
+  or raise a divergence, but they still claim to be instances. Read each
+  one and record the verdict with `classify_shapes` — `instance` if it is,
+  otherwise what it actually is.
 
 ## What this buys
 
diff --git a/src/scribe/services/coverage.py b/src/scribe/services/coverage.py
index d104d45..49e5914 100644
--- a/src/scribe/services/coverage.py
+++ b/src/scribe/services/coverage.py
@@ -369,16 +369,62 @@ def extract_definitions(text: str) -> list[Definition]:
 # the human todo holds only shapes a person should look at, while the bodies
 # stay in play for the proposer, derive grouping and divergence — the five
 # auth views' identical rules were found exactly there. Unscoped `<style>` in
-# a .vue and every non-.vue file stay ordinary.
+# a .vue and every file that is neither .vue nor .svelte stay ordinary.
 _STYLE_OPEN_RE = re.compile(r"^\s*<style\b[^>]*\bscoped\b", re.IGNORECASE)
 _STYLE_CLOSE_RE = re.compile(r"^\s*</style\s*>", re.IGNORECASE)
 
+# Svelte scopes the other way round (#4608): every `<style>` is component-
+# scoped unless it opts out — `<style global>` (svelte-preprocess) for a whole
+# block, `:global(...)` for one selector. Instance `<script>` code is the
+# component's own; `<script context="module">` / `<script module>` is the one
+# block other files can import from, so its definitions stay ordinary.
+_SVELTE_STYLE_OPEN_RE = re.compile(r"^\s*<style\b(?![^>]*\bglobal\b)[^>]*>", re.IGNORECASE)
+_SVELTE_SCRIPT_OPEN_RE = re.compile(r"^\s*<script\b([^>]*)>", re.IGNORECASE)
+_SVELTE_MODULE_ATTR_RE = re.compile(r"""\bcontext\s*=\s*["']module["']|\bmodule\b""", re.IGNORECASE)
+_SCRIPT_CLOSE_RE = re.compile(r"</script\s*>", re.IGNORECASE)
+
+
+def _svelte_scoped(text: str, defs: list[Definition]) -> set[tuple[str, str]]:
+    """`scoped_definitions` for a .svelte file: syms outside a module script,
+    css inside a non-global `<style>` that is not itself `:global(...)`."""
+    lines = text.splitlines()
+    styles: list[tuple[int, int]] = []
+    modules: list[tuple[int, int]] = []
+    style_at: int | None = None
+    module_at: int | None = None
+    for i, ln in enumerate(lines):
+        if style_at is None and _SVELTE_STYLE_OPEN_RE.match(ln):
+            style_at = i
+        elif style_at is not None and _STYLE_CLOSE_RE.match(ln):
+            styles.append((style_at, i))
+            style_at = None
+        m = _SVELTE_SCRIPT_OPEN_RE.match(ln)
+        if module_at is None and m and _SVELTE_MODULE_ATTR_RE.search(m.group(1)):
+            module_at = i
+        if module_at is not None and _SCRIPT_CLOSE_RE.search(ln):
+            modules.append((module_at, i))
+            module_at = None
+    out: set[tuple[str, str]] = set()
+    for d in defs:
+        if d.kind == "sym":
+            if not any(a <= d.line <= b for a, b in modules):
+                out.add((d.kind, d.name))
+        elif any(a <= d.line <= b for a, b in styles):
+            line = lines[d.line] if 0 <= d.line < len(lines) else ""
+            if ":global" not in line:
+                out.add((d.kind, d.name))
+    return out
+
 
 def scoped_definitions(path: str, text: str, defs: list[Definition]) -> set[tuple[str, str]]:
     """The (kind, name) pairs among ``defs`` that are one-offs by
     construction in this file: every sym in a .vue, and every css rule
-    that starts inside a `<style scoped>` block. Empty for other files."""
-    if not (path or "").lower().endswith(".vue"):
+    that starts inside a `<style scoped>` block; for a .svelte, see
+    `_svelte_scoped`. Empty for other files."""
+    lowered = (path or "").lower()
+    if lowered.endswith(".svelte"):
+        return _svelte_scoped(text, defs)
+    if not lowered.endswith(".vue"):
         return set()
     ranges: list[tuple[int, int]] = []
     open_at: int | None = None
@@ -827,6 +873,15 @@ async def compute_coverage(
     proposals = shape_ledger.proposal_summary(rows, consumer_paths=consumer_paths)
     divergence = shape_ledger.divergence_summary(rows)
     derive_new = shape_ledger.derive_new_summary(rows, since=since)
+    # What `stamps_to_review` would list (#4608). The review tool existed and
+    # nobody on two projects knew to call it: 132 and 488 weak stamps sat
+    # electing canons for weeks. The arrival line is the one place a
+    # project's own session is sure to look, so the count goes there.
+    try:
+        review = shape_ledger.stamps_to_review(rows, top=0)
+    except Exception:
+        logger.warning("stamp review read failed", exc_info=True)
+        review = {}
     return {
         "total": len(rows),
         "accounted": len(rows) - unclassified,
@@ -850,6 +905,11 @@ async def compute_coverage(
         "divergent": divergence["divergent"],
         "divergence": divergence["divergence"],
         "recheck": divergence["recheck"],
+        # Unattended stamps below today's floor, and canons whose members no
+        # longer agree what they are — the judgment queue `stamps_to_review`
+        # holds (#4608).
+        "weak_stamps": review.get("weak_count", 0),
+        "incoherent_canons": review.get("incoherent_count", 0),
         # Honesty flag, not decoration: every surface that shows the number
         # is expected to carry it through.
         "estimate": True,
@@ -1042,4 +1102,16 @@ def coverage_line(coverage: dict) -> str:
         line += f"; standing: {', '.join(standing)}"
     if coverage.get("recheck"):
         line += f"; {coverage['recheck']} judged shape{'s' if coverage['recheck'] != 1 else ''} changed since judged — recheck"
+    # Rows the hook asserted on evidence the ledger no longer accepts (#4608).
+    # They no longer elect a canon, but they still claim to be instances
+    # until someone reads them — the tool to call is named, not implied.
+    review = []
+    if coverage.get("weak_stamps"):
+        n_w = coverage["weak_stamps"]
+        review.append(f"{n_w} weak stamp{'s' if n_w != 1 else ''}")
+    if coverage.get("incoherent_canons"):
+        n_i = coverage["incoherent_canons"]
+        review.append(f"{n_i} incoherent canon{'s' if n_i != 1 else ''}")
+    if review:
+        line += f"; {' · '.join(review)} to judge — stamps_to_review"
     return line
diff --git a/src/scribe/services/shape_ledger.py b/src/scribe/services/shape_ledger.py
index 8556e68..d671099 100644
--- a/src/scribe/services/shape_ledger.py
+++ b/src/scribe/services/shape_ledger.py
@@ -1066,6 +1066,8 @@ def canon_form(rows: Iterable, snippet_id: int) -> str:
     for r in rows:
         if r.snippet_id != snippet_id or r.status not in ("canonical", "instance"):
             continue
+        if is_weak_stamp(r):
+            continue
         f = shape_form(getattr(r, "signature", "") or "", r.kind)
         if f:
             forms[f] = forms.get(f, 0) + 1
@@ -2190,6 +2192,25 @@ async def confirm_proposals(
 # suggestion, not the same.
 _RESEMBLE_MIN = 0.80
 
+
+def is_weak_stamp(row) -> bool:
+    """Was this row written by the hook, unattended, on a resemblance below
+    the floor it would have to clear today?
+
+    ONE PREDICATE FOR "WEAK", read by the review surface that lists these rows
+    and by every reader that would otherwise take them as evidence. The floor
+    guards new writes only; the rows stamped before it (#4204) are still
+    stored, and until an agent re-judges them they must not speak. They are
+    not withdrawn here — `stamps_to_review` still lists them for judgment —
+    they are simply not counted, which is the module's rule for evidence it
+    cannot trust: quieter, never more confident (#4608).
+    """
+    if getattr(row, "classified_by", None) not in _UNATTENDED_BY:
+        return False
+    score = stamp_score(getattr(row, "reason", None))
+    return score is not None and score < _RESEMBLE_MIN
+
+
 _DENSITY_MIN_JUDGED = 3
 _DENSITY_SHARE = 0.6
 
@@ -2229,6 +2250,11 @@ def dominant_canon(rows: Iterable[CodeShape]) -> tuple[int, int, int] | None:
     counts: dict[int, int] = {}
     judged = 0
     for r in rows:
+        # A weak stamp is not a judgment: counted, it let a YAML CI snippet
+        # "dominate" a Svelte directory and every write there was told it
+        # diverged from it (#4608).
+        if is_weak_stamp(r):
+            continue
         if r.status in ("canonical", "instance") and r.snippet_id is not None:
             judged += 1
             counts[r.snippet_id] = counts.get(r.snippet_id, 0) + 1
@@ -2488,6 +2514,16 @@ async def flag_divergence(project_id: int, *, since: datetime | None) -> int:
                 if r.status not in _MECHANICAL_TODO:
                     continue
                 if r.diverges_from is not None:
+                    # A flag is a mechanical prompt resting on one premise —
+                    # "this canon dominates here". When the premise no longer
+                    # holds (the rows that elected it were weak stamps, #4608,
+                    # or were re-judged away) the prompt is false, and a false
+                    # prompt on every write is how the flag stopped being
+                    # read. Withdrawing it judges nothing: the row stays
+                    # unclassified, and a judgment is never touched here.
+                    if dom is None or dom[0] != r.diverges_from:
+                        r.diverges_from = None
+                        continue
                     flagged += 1
                     continue
                 if dom is None or r.created_at is None or r.created_at <= since:
@@ -2565,11 +2601,9 @@ def stamps_to_review(rows: Iterable[CodeShape], *, top: int = 10) -> dict:
     live = [r for r in rows if r.vanished_at is None]
     weak = []
     for r in live:
-        if r.status not in _NEEDS_TARGET or r.classified_by != "hook":
+        if r.status not in _NEEDS_TARGET or not is_weak_stamp(r):
             continue
         score = stamp_score(r.reason)
-        if score is None or score >= _RESEMBLE_MIN:
-            continue
         weak.append({
             "path": r.path, "symbol": r.symbol, "kind": r.kind,
             "status": r.status, "snippet_id": r.snippet_id,
@@ -2602,11 +2636,7 @@ def stamps_to_review(rows: Iterable[CodeShape], *, top: int = 10) -> dict:
             # The listing below is capped; without this you cannot tell a
             # canon with twelve strangers from one with three hundred.
             "stranger_count": len(coh["strangers"]),
-            "weak_rows": sum(
-                1 for r in members
-                if r.classified_by in _UNATTENDED_BY
-                and (stamp_score(r.reason) or 1.0) < _RESEMBLE_MIN
-            ),
+            "weak_rows": sum(1 for r in members if is_weak_stamp(r)),
             # The rows that do NOT fit — not the first dozen members. The
             # reader's question is "which ones are wrong", and a sample of
             # the majority cannot answer it.
diff --git a/tests/test_integration_shape_classify.py b/tests/test_integration_shape_classify.py
index a961e2d..b8a2343 100644
--- a/tests/test_integration_shape_classify.py
+++ b/tests/test_integration_shape_classify.py
@@ -889,6 +889,84 @@ async def test_a_second_confirm_dialog_is_detected_and_named(seeded):
     assert total == 0
 
 
+@pytest.mark.integration
+async def test_weak_stamps_elect_no_canon_and_their_flags_are_withdrawn(seeded):
+    """#4608, the poisoned-ledger case as it stood on two projects: a
+    directory's "dominant canon" was elected entirely by hook stamps written
+    at 0.68-0.72, before the 0.80 floor, so every new shape there was told it
+    diverged from a YAML CI snippet. The same fixture as the acceptance case
+    above, with one difference — the four instances are weak hook stamps
+    rather than an audit — and the prompt must fall silent: at refresh (the
+    standing flag is withdrawn) and at write time. The stamps themselves are
+    left exactly as they were, for `stamps_to_review` to put before a judge."""
+    from datetime import datetime, timedelta, timezone
+
+    from sqlalchemy import update
+
+    from scribe.services import snippets as snippets_svc
+    from scribe.services.shape_ledger import (
+        _RESEMBLE_REASON, flag_divergence, propose_for_repo, write_time_divergence,
+    )
+
+    owner, pid = seeded["owner"], seeded["pid"]
+    canon = await snippets_svc.create_snippet(
+        owner, name="cls_confirm_factory",
+        code="export async function factory(): Promise<boolean> {\n  return true;\n}\n",
+        language="typescript", repo="Widget",
+        path="frontend/src/composables/useConfirm.ts", symbol="factory",
+        project_id=pid,
+    )
+    sid = int(canon.id)
+    comp = "frontend/src/components"
+    names = ("Trash", "Delete", "Remove", "Restore")
+    base = _defs(
+        *[(f"{comp}/{n}.vue", "sym", f"on{n}", f"async function on{n}() {{",
+           f"async function on{n}() {{\n  const ok = await factory();\n  if (!ok) return;\n}}")
+          for n in names],
+    )
+    await sync_repo_shapes(pid, REPO, base, seen_marker="aaa111")
+    await classify_shapes(owner, pid, [
+        {"path": f"{comp}/{n}.vue", "symbol": f"on{n}", "status": "instance", "snippet_id": sid}
+        for n in names
+    ], via="audit")
+    previous = datetime.now(timezone.utc)
+    later = base + _defs(
+        (f"{comp}/Danger.vue", "sym", "confirmDanger", "function confirmDanger() {",
+         "function confirmDanger() {\n  return window.confirm('Really?');\n}"),
+    )
+    await sync_repo_shapes(pid, REPO, later, seen_marker="bbb222")
+    with _quiet_semantic():
+        await propose_for_repo(owner, pid, REPO, later)
+    since = previous - timedelta(seconds=1)
+    # Judged by an audit, the canon dominates and the new shape is flagged.
+    assert await flag_divergence(pid, since=since) == 1
+
+    # Now make the four what the poisoned ledgers held: unattended stamps
+    # below today's floor.
+    weak = _RESEMBLE_REASON.format(sid=sid, score=0.72)
+    async with async_session() as session:
+        await session.execute(
+            update(CodeShape)
+            .where(CodeShape.project_id == pid, CodeShape.snippet_id == sid)
+            .values(classified_by="hook", reason=weak)
+        )
+        await session.commit()
+
+    assert await flag_divergence(pid, since=since) == 0
+    rows, total = await list_project_shapes(owner, pid, flag="divergence")
+    assert total == 0, "a flag whose canon no longer dominates is withdrawn"
+    assert await write_time_divergence(
+        pid, f"{comp}/Danger.vue", [("sym", "confirmDanger")], stamped=[]
+    ) == []
+    # Nothing was un-judged: the stamps stand until someone reads them.
+    async with async_session() as session:
+        kept = (await session.execute(
+            select(CodeShape).where(CodeShape.project_id == pid, CodeShape.snippet_id == sid)
+        )).scalars().all()
+    assert len(kept) == 4
+    assert all(r.status == "instance" and r.classified_by == "hook" for r in kept)
+
+
 @pytest.mark.integration
 async def test_a_semantic_miss_does_not_silence_the_prompt(seeded):
     """#4208, reversed on measurement: a semantic miss is not evidence.
diff --git a/tests/test_pattern_coverage.py b/tests/test_pattern_coverage.py
index 1cfb0d3..69c8236 100644
--- a/tests/test_pattern_coverage.py
+++ b/tests/test_pattern_coverage.py
@@ -823,6 +823,49 @@ def test_scoped_definitions_are_vue_script_setup_and_scoped_style_only():
     assert scoped_definitions("src/a.py", "def load():\n    pass\n", extract_definitions("def load():\n    pass\n")) == set()
 
 
+def test_svelte_scopes_by_default_and_its_module_script_stays_importable():
+    """#4608: Svelte scopes the other way round from Vue — every <style> is
+    the component's own unless it opts out, and only <script module> /
+    <script context="module"> can be imported elsewhere. Without this a
+    Svelte project's every `.card` and `.title` sat in the human todo."""
+    from scribe.services.coverage import extract_definitions, scoped_definitions
+    svelte = (
+        "<script module lang=\"ts\">\n"
+        "export function stageOf(x: number) {\n  return x;\n}\n"
+        "</script>\n\n"
+        "<script lang=\"ts\">\n"
+        "function toggle() {\n  open = !open;\n}\n"
+        "</script>\n\n"
+        "<div class=\"card\"></div>\n\n"
+        "<style>\n.card {\n  padding: 1rem;\n}\n:global(.toast) {\n  color: red;\n}\n</style>\n"
+    )
+    defs = extract_definitions(svelte)
+    names = {(d.kind, d.name) for d in defs}
+    assert {("sym", "stageOf"), ("sym", "toggle"), ("css", "card")} <= names
+    scoped = scoped_definitions("web/src/lib/A.svelte", svelte, defs)
+    assert ("sym", "toggle") in scoped and ("css", "card") in scoped
+    assert ("sym", "stageOf") not in scoped, "a module script's export is importable"
+    assert not any(n == "toast" for _, n in scoped), ":global(...) opts a selector out"
+    # The legacy spelling of the module block, and a whole global style block.
+    legacy = (
+        "<script context=\"module\">\nexport function shared() {\n  return 1;\n}\n</script>\n"
+        "<style global>\n.page {\n  margin: 0;\n}\n</style>\n"
+    )
+    assert scoped_definitions("web/src/lib/B.svelte", legacy, extract_definitions(legacy)) == set()
+
+
+def test_the_line_names_the_review_queue_and_the_tool_that_holds_it():
+    """#4608: `stamps_to_review` existed and two projects never called it,
+    because nothing on arrival said there was anything to review."""
+    from scribe.services.coverage import coverage_line
+    base = {"accounted": 10, "total": 10, "counts": {"exempt": 10},
+            "unclassified": 0, "computed_at": "2026-09-30T00:00:00"}
+    assert "stamps_to_review" not in coverage_line(base)
+    line = coverage_line({**base, "weak_stamps": 132, "incoherent_canons": 3})
+    assert line.endswith("; 132 weak stamps · 3 incoherent canons to judge — stamps_to_review")
+    assert coverage_line({**base, "weak_stamps": 1}).endswith("; 1 weak stamp to judge — stamps_to_review")
+
+
 @pytest.mark.integration
 async def test_binding_ref_is_the_branch_the_ledger_follows(seeded):
     """#2873: a binding that names a ref is read at that ref (not the forge's
diff --git a/tests/test_stamps_to_review.py b/tests/test_stamps_to_review.py
index ac839b6..b4d7066 100644
--- a/tests/test_stamps_to_review.py
+++ b/tests/test_stamps_to_review.py
@@ -350,3 +350,53 @@ def test_the_coherence_verdict_reads_rows_and_writes_nothing() -> None:
     canon_coherence(rows)
     assert [(r.path, r.symbol, r.status, r.snippet_id, r.signature)
             for r in rows] == before
+
+
+# ── a weak stamp is listed for judgment and counted by nobody (#4608) ─────
+#
+# The floor guarded new writes; the rows written before it went on electing
+# canons. On two projects a YAML CI snippet "dominated" a Svelte directory on
+# the strength of 0.68-0.72 stamps, and every write there was told it
+# diverged from it. The readers below must agree with the review surface
+# about what "weak" means — one predicate, so they cannot drift apart.
+
+def test_one_predicate_says_what_weak_is() -> None:
+    from scribe.services.shape_ledger import is_weak_stamp
+
+    assert is_weak_stamp(_stamped(0.72))
+    assert not is_weak_stamp(_stamped(_RESEMBLE_MIN))
+    # A by-name stamp carries no score: it is not resemblance evidence at all.
+    assert not is_weak_stamp(_Row(reason="hook: pulled #1; payload references `f`"))
+    for by in ("agent", "audit", "mechanical"):
+        assert not is_weak_stamp(_stamped(0.5, classified_by=by)), by
+
+
+def test_weak_stamps_do_not_elect_a_dominant_canon() -> None:
+    from scribe.services.shape_ledger import dominant_canon
+
+    weak = [_stamped(0.72, path=f"web/src/lib/{i}.ts", symbol=f"f{i}") for i in range(5)]
+    assert dominant_canon(weak) is None
+    # The same rows judged by an agent do — the kind of evidence is the point.
+    judged = [_stamped(0.72, path=f"web/src/lib/{i}.ts", symbol=f"f{i}", classified_by="agent")
+              for i in range(5)]
+    assert dominant_canon(judged) == (1, 5, 5)
+    # And weak rows do not dilute a real majority either: they are not counted
+    # as judged at all.
+    mixed = judged[:3] + [_stamped(0.7, snippet_id=2, symbol=f"g{i}") for i in range(4)]
+    assert dominant_canon(mixed) == (1, 3, 3)
+
+
+def test_weak_stamps_do_not_say_what_form_a_canon_is() -> None:
+    from scribe.services.shape_ledger import FORM_UNKNOWN, canon_form
+
+    weak = [_stamped(0.7, symbol=f"T{i}", signature=f"class T{i}:") for i in range(5)]
+    assert canon_form(weak, 1) == FORM_UNKNOWN
+    judged = [_stamped(0.7, symbol=f"T{i}", signature=f"class T{i}:", classified_by="audit")
+              for i in range(5)]
+    assert canon_form(judged + weak, 1) == canon_form(judged, 1) != FORM_UNKNOWN
+
+
+def test_counting_them_out_leaves_them_listed() -> None:
+    """Not counted is not withdrawn: the review still lists every one."""
+    rows = [_stamped(0.7, symbol=f"f{i}") for i in range(3)]
+    assert stamps_to_review(rows)["weak_count"] == 3