feat(telemetry): rule_usage_events — the table, the service, and a restore that maps rule ids through the rule map (#3315)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Failing after 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 8s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 30s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 33s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m5s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Failing after 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 8s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 30s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 33s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m5s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Milestone 333 step 1. The write-path standing-rule arm is the only retrieval surface in Scribe whose usefulness cannot be observed — and, not coincidentally, the only one that has never declined to fire. 296 calls, zero zero-result, 100% clearing its threshold, while every other surface declines most of the time (#3311, and re-measured in note #3430). `retrieval_logs` gives it scores; scores say what the ranker thought, never whether the hint landed. WHY A SIBLING TABLE AND NOT A COLUMN ON note_usage_events. The row carries no note-specific field and the readout is the same shape, which is the strongest case for sharing that note #3163 admits. What decides against it is identity at RESTORE: the note importer maps note_id through note_id_map, so a rule id parked in that column comes back attached to whatever note holds that number in the target database. Not dropped — reattached. The restore reports success, the counters are populated, and every one is about the wrong record, with no other field to disagree with. rule_versions made the same call for the same reason; this is the third rule-side sibling and it reads like the first two. FK-free on rule_id and user_id, matching note_usage_events / retrieval_logs / app_logs, and deliberately unlike rule_versions. A version belongs to a rule's history and dies with it; telemetry outlives what it describes. Deleting a rule must not erase the evidence that it was surfaced forty times and opened never, because that evidence is the case for having deleted it. The service uses `background.spawn` rather than a third copy of the strong-reference dance — that module's own docstring says new callers should, and a fourth copy is how one of them drifts. The AppLog canary #2663 demands is kept, and since `rule_usage` needed exactly `note_usage`'s semantics, that canary moved into `background.report_telemetry_failure` and note_usage now calls it. `retrieval_telemetry` deliberately keeps its own: its canary is a different shape (one process-wide flag, no AppLog row), so repointing it would change behaviour rather than consolidate it. No ambient bucket, and that is a decision. The note twin splits ranked from ambient surfacings because enter_project and the skill sync deliver records without choosing them (#2477). Rules have the same problem waiting — list_always_on_rules loads them wholesale — but nothing emits here yet, so an empty AMBIENT_SOURCES would be machinery pretending to a distinction the data does not contain. `source` stays granular, so the split stays a readout-level change needing no migration. Backup carries it (v14). The round-trip test seeds a NOTE alongside the rule so the target database has a note id to collide with — without that decoy, a restore running rule ids through the wrong map would merely drop them and the test would pass by absence, rather than failing on the populated-and-wrong result that is the actual hazard. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TcCs1CcQ1ormdnzSshKqvN
This commit is contained in:
@@ -30,13 +30,13 @@ from __future__ import annotations
|
||||
|
||||
import asyncio
|
||||
import logging
|
||||
import traceback
|
||||
|
||||
from sqlalchemy import case, func, select
|
||||
|
||||
from scribe.models import async_session
|
||||
from scribe.models.note_usage import PULLED, SURFACED, NoteUsageEvent
|
||||
from scribe.models.base import iso
|
||||
from scribe.services.background import report_telemetry_failure
|
||||
|
||||
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -46,37 +46,19 @@ logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
||||
# never lands. The done-callback discard keeps the set from growing.
|
||||
_pending: set[asyncio.Task] = set()
|
||||
|
||||
# Sites that already dropped their once-per-process AppLog row. The readout
|
||||
# runs on every snippet list render — without this, a broken table would turn
|
||||
# the error log into a firehose that buries the finding it exists to surface.
|
||||
_reported: set[str] = set()
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
async def _report_failure(site: str) -> None:
|
||||
"""Make a swallowed telemetry failure visible. Called from an except block.
|
||||
"""This subsystem's canary, now the shared one.
|
||||
|
||||
WARNING to the process log every time; one AppLog error row per process per
|
||||
site so the admin UI shows the outage without host access. The AppLog write
|
||||
is itself guarded — when the whole database is down it fails too, and that
|
||||
is fine: the WARNING already said so, and a canary must never take down the
|
||||
surface it watches.
|
||||
The per-site dedup, the WARNING and the single AppLog row all moved to
|
||||
`background.report_telemetry_failure` unchanged when `rule_usage` needed
|
||||
the identical behaviour — two hand-kept copies of a thing whose whole job
|
||||
is to be reliable is the wrong number. `retrieval_telemetry` deliberately
|
||||
still has its own: its canary is a different shape (one process-wide flag,
|
||||
no AppLog row), so repointing it would change behaviour rather than
|
||||
consolidate it.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
logger.warning("note usage telemetry %s failed", site, exc_info=True)
|
||||
if site in _reported:
|
||||
return
|
||||
_reported.add(site)
|
||||
try:
|
||||
from scribe.services.logging import log_error
|
||||
|
||||
await log_error(
|
||||
endpoint="note_usage",
|
||||
error_type=f"note_usage_{site}_failed",
|
||||
error_message=f"note usage telemetry {site} is failing; "
|
||||
"usage counters will read zero until this is fixed",
|
||||
traceback=traceback.format_exc(),
|
||||
)
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
logger.debug("note usage canary write failed", exc_info=True)
|
||||
await report_telemetry_failure("note_usage", site)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
async def _insert_events(rows: list[dict]) -> None:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user