refactor(routes): one supersession seam for REST and MCP; PUT/PATCH notes share a handler; shared mask/not-found/caller helpers (#2829, milestone 296 area 5)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 9s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 25s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 32s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 37s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 9s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 25s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 32s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 37s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Reading the 28 route modules against each other and against the MCP tools: - routes/notes.py carried a PUT and a PATCH handler that were the same function minus the supersedes contract on one of them — one handler now serves both verbs, so both carry it. - The two _attach_supersession copies (REST + MCP) become supersession_svc.attach_relations(uid, note_id, data, hint=) — the seam the two surfaces must agree through; only the agent surface adds the one-sentence reading hint. - Three local _uid() wrappers over g.user.id → scribe.auth.get_current_user_id like every other module; design_systems' private _not_found → routes.utils. not_found; the four "********" literals → settings_svc.SECRET_MASK with the read/write contract written once. - routes/plugin.py: the project_id/repo resolution block and the comma-separated id parse were copied into three endpoints — _project_scope() and _int_list() now. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -62,30 +62,6 @@ async def list_notes(
|
||||
return {"notes": [n.to_dict() for n in rows], "total": total}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
async def _attach_supersession(uid: int, note_id: int, data: dict) -> None:
|
||||
"""Add both directions of the supersession relation to a note payload.
|
||||
|
||||
Both, because they answer different questions and only one of them is
|
||||
obvious. `supersedes` is what the author claimed. `superseded_by` is what a
|
||||
READER needs and what the note itself cannot know — a stale record handed
|
||||
over without that marker gets acted on confidently, which is worse than
|
||||
never surfacing it.
|
||||
|
||||
Omitted entirely when empty, so an ordinary note's payload doesn't grow two
|
||||
permanently-empty lists. A field that always says nothing trains readers to
|
||||
skip fields, which is the lesson `consolidated_at` cost us (#2483).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
rel = await supersession_svc.get_relations(uid, note_id)
|
||||
if rel["supersedes"]:
|
||||
data["supersedes"] = rel["supersedes"]
|
||||
if rel["superseded_by"]:
|
||||
data["superseded_by"] = rel["superseded_by"]
|
||||
data["superseded_note"] = (
|
||||
"A later note claims to bring this up to date — see superseded_by. "
|
||||
"Read this as what was true when written, and check the newer one "
|
||||
"before acting on it."
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
async def get_note(note_id: int) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Fetch the full content of a single Scribe note by its ID.
|
||||
@@ -113,7 +89,7 @@ async def get_note(note_id: int) -> dict:
|
||||
# snippets would leave those permanently at zero pulls and make them look
|
||||
# like dead weight next to snippets that merely had a counter (#2085).
|
||||
record_pulled(user_id=uid, note_id=int(note.id), source="mcp_get_note")
|
||||
await _attach_supersession(uid, note_id, out)
|
||||
await supersession_svc.attach_relations(uid, note_id, out, hint=True)
|
||||
await systems_tools.attach_systems(
|
||||
uid, getattr(note, "user_id", uid) or uid, out, note.id, note.project_id
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -186,7 +162,7 @@ async def create_note(
|
||||
raise ValueError(str(exc)) from exc
|
||||
data = note.to_dict()
|
||||
await systems_tools.attach_systems(uid, uid, data, note.id, project_id or None)
|
||||
await _attach_supersession(uid, note.id, data)
|
||||
await supersession_svc.attach_relations(uid, note.id, data, hint=True)
|
||||
return data
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -237,7 +213,7 @@ async def update_note(
|
||||
await systems_tools.attach_systems(
|
||||
uid, getattr(note, "user_id", uid) or uid, data, note_id, note.project_id
|
||||
)
|
||||
await _attach_supersession(uid, note_id, data)
|
||||
await supersession_svc.attach_relations(uid, note_id, data, hint=True)
|
||||
return data
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user