fix(systems): sweeps are the discovery moment — zero-Systems hint, create_system dedup gate, prose inverted
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 7s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 16s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 29s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 7s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 16s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 29s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
First real-world test of the #2562 fixes (Scribe issue #2569): a Forge session ran a whole-codebase audit and created zero Systems — endorsed by the shipped guidance, whose "no particular area takes none" clause read as an exemption for exactly the record type that enumerates the subsystem vocabulary. And the systems_hint was silent for a zero-Systems project, the one state nothing else nudges out of. - systems_hint gains a zero-Systems branch: prompt the FIRST create_system instead of going quiet. - create_system is duplicate-gated like the other creates (normalized name, archived included, fail-open) — liberal creation becomes safe by construction, so the guidance can stop preaching restraint. - Prose inverted on every surface (hint text, create_system docstring, floor bullet, using-scribe step 7): audits/sweeps take several tags and mint the Systems they name; the gate is the guardrail against sprawl, not holding back; only a record genuinely about no particular area goes untagged. - Plugin 0.1.26 -> 0.1.27. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -88,7 +88,13 @@ Two constraints on *how* that's achieved:
|
||||
`list_system_records` returns? If the area has no System yet, create one
|
||||
(`create_system`: name + a one-paragraph charter) — an area that plainly
|
||||
exists deserves naming the moment two records would share it; don't wait to
|
||||
be asked. A record about no particular area takes none.
|
||||
be asked. Cross-cutting records — audits, sweeps, reviews — take *several*
|
||||
tags and are the prime discovery moment: a pass that walks the subsystems
|
||||
has just enumerated the vocabulary, so mint the Systems it names as it
|
||||
names them. Create liberally — `create_system` is duplicate-gated, and that
|
||||
gate (plus reviewing the existing list) is the guardrail against sprawl,
|
||||
not restraint. Only a record genuinely about no particular area goes
|
||||
untagged.
|
||||
|
||||
8. **State updates in place; chronicles don't.** A dev-log records what
|
||||
*happened* — write it once, never rewrite it. A durable finding (how a
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user