feat(systems): bootstrap mints directly — the standard vocabulary replaces operator approval (#2798)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 5s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 15s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 34s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 40s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m5s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 59s

Operator directive: creating Systems is the agent's call, not an approval
flow — "propose to the operator, create each confirmed one" made the
operator a permission gate. The bootstrap ask now says create_system 3-6
directly, in-session, and the consistency that approval was covering moves
to a standard cross-project vocabulary (CI & Release, Auth & Access, Data
Model & Storage, API Surface, UI & Design, Import & Export, Background
Jobs, Observability): use the standard name verbatim where the area fits,
mint freely beyond it, the duplicate gate guards sprawl. create_system and
enter_project docstrings carry the same contract.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-19 20:05:02 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Fable 5
parent d50ebbad66
commit 5265d11a6a
4 changed files with 46 additions and 20 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ def _enter_project_stubs(p):
async def test_enter_project_carries_the_bootstrap_ask_when_it_fires():
"""The arrival-moment half of #2683: a mature zero-Systems project greets
the session with the concrete bootstrap ask, before it is deep in a task —
the moment "propose a starter vocabulary" is cheapest."""
the moment minting a starter vocabulary is cheapest."""
import contextlib
ask = "This project has 282 records and NO Systems modelled — ..."