refactor(mcp): _INSTRUCTIONS orients the workflow, not a rulebook (#4389)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Failing after 12s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 53s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 54s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m35s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 23s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Failing after 12s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 53s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 54s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m35s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 23s
Spike #4389 read the spec, Claude's docs and a dozen servers: the field is for how the tools fit together, and the field runs ~600-1,600 characters. Ours sat at the 2,048 cap as a keyword index that also carried stance. - JUDGE, REPORT and MISSED leave the index. They fire mid-work, not at session start; using-scribe and reporting-back state them in full, and `placement`/`report_back` cue reporting in-band. No skill text changes. - The rest is rewritten as plain practices (1,503 chars) and keeps every session-start marker the ownership registry pins. - INSTRUCTIONS_BUDGET 2000 -> 1600; the three index markers are dropped from the registry; the miss-route index test now checks that the index keeps what_might_apply and stays off the route. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -139,20 +139,19 @@ def test_writing_a_new_record_asks_what_already_covers_the_moment():
|
||||
assert "no bar" in text
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def test_the_index_points_at_the_route_without_restating_it():
|
||||
def test_the_route_stays_off_the_index():
|
||||
"""`_INSTRUCTIONS` is the only surface every MCP client gets (decision #4027).
|
||||
|
||||
It indexes; using-scribe states. A client with no Agent Skills support still
|
||||
learns the ordering exists and which tool opens it.
|
||||
It carried a one-line MISSED pointer to this route until #4389, which found
|
||||
the index was being used as a rulebook: a missed rule is noticed mid-work,
|
||||
not at session start, and the spec asks server instructions for the
|
||||
workflow across tools, not stance. using-scribe states the route (the tests
|
||||
above pin it); the index keeps what_might_apply, the tool that opens it.
|
||||
|
||||
Whitespace-flattened before matching. The block is hard-wrapped to fit a
|
||||
2,000-character budget, so a phrase straddles a line break the moment
|
||||
anything before it changes length — #4103 shipped a guard that broke
|
||||
exactly that way, on text nobody had touched.
|
||||
Whitespace-flattened before matching: the block is hard-wrapped, so a
|
||||
phrase straddles a line break the moment anything before it changes length
|
||||
(#4103).
|
||||
"""
|
||||
text = " ".join(_instructions().split())
|
||||
assert "retrieval_telemetry" in text
|
||||
assert "not a floor to move" in text
|
||||
# The route itself must NOT be here — 2,000 characters is the whole budget
|
||||
# and Claude Code cuts the rest mid-word (#2562).
|
||||
assert "take it to the record first" not in text.lower()
|
||||
text = " ".join(_instructions().split()).lower()
|
||||
assert "what_might_apply" in text
|
||||
assert "take it to the record first" not in text
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user