feat(rules): the instruction surfaces say to RETRIEVE a rule, not only to receive one (#3523)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 8s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 32s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m7s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 4m18s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 25s

Every instruction surface told a session to load the always-on rules and
stopped there. None said the loaded set is partial, so an empty one read as
"no rule applies" when it only ever meant "none was pushed" — different
claims, and only one of them has been checked.

That is #2198's asymmetry one level in. The earlier defect was trusting the
SessionStart push over the explicit pull; this is trusting the resident TIER
as if it were the whole rulebook.

It is also why the always-on tier was the only one that worked, on any install
rather than this one (rule 115): a rule nothing retrieves must be resident to
bind at all, and a resident rule costs tokens in every session forever — so a
rulebook that only delivers cannot grow past what one session holds.
Retrieval lifts that ceiling, and it fires only if something asks. A
tool-choice reflex asks least of all (#3476, #161).

The same obligation now lands on all three session-start surfaces, because
rule 119 makes them the specification jointly and a surface stating it
differently IS the product behaving differently (#2497). Pinned by
test_every_session_start_surface_states_the_conditional_retrieval, mirroring
the pull test beside it.

THE BUDGET TRADE. _INSTRUCTIONS sat at 1978 against a 2000 test budget, and
its own comment says an addition there is a trade, never an append. Bought the
new clause by trading out "Processes are saved procedures (follow verbatim)"
and "Deletes are trash-recoverable" — both already in DISPLACED_TOPICS and
already stated on a delivered surface, and both per-tool guidance, which by
this block's doctrine belongs in the tool docstring. Now 1976. Recorded in the
comment above the block so it is not silently reversed.

Plugin version minted: shipped plugin content moved.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011cPyzNnegXHr5iRMzzy5KJ
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-03 21:41:53 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 8be555d6dd
commit 30d87e461a
5 changed files with 104 additions and 8 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
{
"name": "scribe",
"description": "Scribe system-of-record for Claude Code: MCP tools over your notes/tasks/projects/rules, a session-start push channel that surfaces your always-on rules + active-project context, process-skills (writing-plans, systematic-debugging, verification, brainstorming, reusing-code), and your saved Scribe Processes auto-surfaced as skills (/scribe:sync). Replaces superpowers + file-memory with one app-backed plugin.",
"version": "2026.09.03.0329",
"version": "2026.09.04.0140",
"author": {
"name": "Bryan Van Deusen"
},
+10
View File
@@ -21,6 +21,16 @@ for the operator's work, and as your own working memory across sessions.
compaction — call `list_always_on_rules()` (and `enter_project()` when a
project is in scope) BEFORE acting. When a loaded rule and a default habit
disagree, the rule wins; if no rule speaks to it, ask rather than assume.
- **What you loaded is not all of the rules.** Only the always-on tier arrives
that way; conditional rules are RETRIEVED, and one you were never handed
binds exactly as hard. So before a consequential act, `search` for a rule
about it (`content_type="rule"`) rather than concluding from an empty
loaded set that nothing applies. "I was not told" is not the same as "there
is no rule," and only one of those is checkable.
This bites hardest on which TOOL to reach for — curling an API that has an
MCP client, standing up a local stack, running a suite CI owns. Those feel
like mechanics rather than decisions, so they raise no doubt and generate no
query; the moment you are most confident is the moment to look.
- **Recall before acting** — before you answer anything about the operator's
work or start a task, `search` Scribe first; assume a related note, task, or
decision already exists. Concretely, reach for recall whenever a request
+25 -4
View File
@@ -56,10 +56,31 @@ Two constraints on *how* that's achieved:
re-deriving it or opening a duplicate. When a project is in scope, pass its
`project_id` so results stay scoped.
2. **Standing rules are binding.** Load them via `list_always_on_rules()` at
session start (see "Do this first"); treat every one as binding. Pull a
rule's full statement with `get_rule(id)` when it's about to bite. When a
project is in scope, `enter_project(id)` also returns its applicable rules.
2. **Standing rules are binding — and the ones you were handed are not all of
them.** Load the resident set via `list_always_on_rules()` at session start
(see "Do this first"); treat every one as binding. Pull a rule's full
statement with `get_rule(id)` when it's about to bite. When a project is in
scope, `enter_project(id)` also returns its applicable rules.
Rules come in two tiers. **Always-on** rules are delivered — they arrive
whether or not you ask. **Conditional** rules are RETRIEVED, and one binds
just as hard for never having been handed to you. So before a consequential
act, `search(content_type="rule")` on what you are about to do. An empty
loaded set is not evidence that no rule applies; it is only evidence that
none was pushed, and those are different claims.
The tier split exists because delivery does not scale: every resident rule
costs tokens in every session forever, so a rulebook that grows past a few
dozen either stops growing or stops fitting. Retrieval is what lets the
rulebook keep growing — but retrieval only fires if something asks.
**Ask hardest where you feel most certain.** Rules about which TOOL to reach
for — use the forge's MCP client rather than curling its API, don't stand up
a local stack, don't run the suite CI owns — govern moves that feel like
mechanics rather than decisions. A reflex raises no doubt, so it generates
no query, so the rule that would have stopped it is never retrieved. That is
the failure this instruction exists to prevent, and confidence is its only
warning sign.
3. **Update over duplicate.** When recording, prefer updating an existing
note/rule/task over creating a new one. Search first; revise what's there.
+28 -3
View File
@@ -45,6 +45,31 @@ from quart import Quart
# The accepted cost: an agent that never opens create_note's docstring never
# learns the field exists. Guidance lives in the create_note / update_note
# docstrings and the using-scribe skill instead.
#
# Milestone 333 step 3 (2026-09-04) bought the HOW bullet's second clause —
# search(content_type="rule") before a consequential act — by TRADING OUT
# "Processes are saved procedures (follow verbatim)" and "Deletes are
# trash-recoverable". Recorded so the trade is not silently reversed:
# - Both were already in test_instruction_surfaces_agree's DISPLACED_TOPICS
# and already stated on a delivered surface, so nothing fell off: the
# process reflex is in every scribe-proc-* skill listing (each says the
# process governs and is followed verbatim), and trash recovery is in the
# delete_*/list_trash/restore docstrings, which is where per-tool guidance
# belongs by this block's own doctrine.
# - What it bought is not per-tool guidance and has nowhere else to live at
# session-start altitude. Rules were retrievable only by RESIDENCY: the
# always-on preload put them in front of the agent, and nothing told a
# session to go looking for one it had not been handed. The tier split is
# therefore load-bearing on ANY install (rule 115): a delivered rule costs
# tokens in every session forever, so a rulebook that only delivers cannot
# grow past what one session can hold, and every rule worth keeping has to
# become resident to bind at all. Retrieval is what lets it keep growing —
# and retrieval fires only if something asks, which nothing told a session
# to do. A tool-choice reflex asks least of all (#3476, #161).
# - This states the PULL for conditional rules, exactly as the surrounding
# line states it for always-on ones. Rule 119 makes these surfaces the
# specification, so the same sentence lands on all three session-start
# surfaces, and test_instruction_surfaces_agree pins it.
_INSTRUCTIONS = """
Scribe is the operator's self-hosted second brain and system of record — and
yours: recall from it before acting, record as you go. Keep no parallel copy
@@ -63,13 +88,13 @@ Hierarchy: Project -> Milestone -> Task/Note. The map, by purpose:
active project_id to stay in scope.
- WHERE work happens: Systems. Tag records with system_ids as you write;
create_system when the area is unmodelled.
- HOW: rules are binding — list_always_on_rules() at session start.
- HOW: rules bind. list_always_on_rules() at start; before a consequential
act, search(content_type="rule") — the resident set is not all of them.
- UI: the project's design system is binding — resolve_design_system /
get_design_system_stylesheet before hand-writing a value.
- REUSE: search snippets before writing a helper; record what you build with
create_snippet; classify shapes against canon (classify_shapes) — a
consumer map is rows, never prose. Processes are saved procedures (follow
verbatim). Deletes are trash-recoverable.
consumer map is rows, never prose.
A task is a note with status (*_note vs *_task tools).
Creates are duplicate-gated: a near-match BLOCKS and returns the existing
+40
View File
@@ -195,6 +195,46 @@ def test_displaced_topics_live_on_a_delivered_surface():
)
# The SECOND pull (milestone 333 step 3). `list_always_on_rules()` fetches the
# resident tier; this one says that tier is not all of them, and that a
# conditional rule has to be gone looking for. However a surface words the
# surrounding prose, it names the call.
RETRIEVE = 'content_type="rule"'
def test_every_session_start_surface_states_the_conditional_retrieval():
"""The push/pull asymmetry, one level in.
The tests above pin that a session PULLS the resident rules rather than
trusting the SessionStart push. This pins the same shape between the two
TIERS: an always-on rule is delivered, a conditional one is retrieved, and
a surface that states only the first leaves a session reading its loaded
set as the whole rulebook.
That reading is wrong in the direction that costs something. "Nothing was
pushed" and "no rule applies" are different claims, and only one of them
has been checked — the same asymmetry as #2198, now between tiers instead
of between channels.
It is also what made the always-on tier the only one that worked, on any
install rather than this one (rule 115). A rule nothing retrieves has to be
resident to bind at all, so every rule worth keeping becomes resident; and
a resident rule costs tokens in every session forever, so a rulebook that
only delivers cannot grow past what one session can hold. Retrieval is what
lifts that ceiling — and it only fires if something asks.
"""
missing = []
for path in SESSION_START_SURFACES:
if RETRIEVE not in path.read_text():
missing.append(str(path.relative_to(ROOT)))
assert not missing, (
f"these surfaces state the always-on pull but never tell the agent to "
f"retrieve a conditional rule ({RETRIEVE}): {missing}. A session that "
f"reads its loaded set as the whole rulebook will act on \"I was not "
f"told\" as if it meant \"there is no rule\" (milestone 333 step 3)."
)
def test_no_surface_names_the_push_without_stating_the_pull():
"""The exact shape #2497 took.