feat(ui): a note's check is editable, dated and sweepable (#3167, milestone 317 step 4)
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 39s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m12s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m41s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 1m1s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 39s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m12s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m41s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 1m1s
Rule 27: no UI, no ship. Three surfaces. THE EDITOR ASKS, but only where the answer can be saved: the fields appear for a plain note and not for a task or a snippet, matching the service gate from step 2 so the form never offers a write the save would reject. The labels are phrased as the QUESTION rather than the field name — "how would someone check this is still true?" and, underneath, "could this become false without anyone editing it?". "Verify with" gets filled in on every note; the question gets filled in on the few that can go stale. `expires_when` appears only once a check exists, and asks for a state rather than a date in the placeholder itself. THE NOTE SHOWS ITS AGE beside the field — "checked 2026-08-28" or "never checked", italic, and nothing at all when no check exists. No red/amber ramp, matching RuleSweepPane: a colour scale would restate the sweep's ordering and force an invented staleness threshold. "Never" is marked because it is categorically different from a date, not a worse one. THE SWEEP is a pane in the Knowledge view, not beside the rules sweep — operator's call, taken over a unified "everything due" surface and over a second pane under /rules. Notes stay where notes live. The cost, accepted knowingly: no single screen shows every unconfirmed record. It REPLACES the feed rather than filtering it, because a facet answers "show me this kind" and this answers "show me what nobody has confirmed" — a question the type chips cannot narrow without under-reporting. Two REST routes for it, since step 3 built only the service and the MCP door. Along the way: NoteEditorView spelled its write payload out at three call sites (save, create, auto-save), so every new field had to be added three times — which is how one of them ends up not carrying it. Now one `payload()` and one `snapshot()`. Known and filed, not fixed: NoteSweepPane copies ~12 scoped CSS rules from RuleSweepPane (#3207). The clean extraction needs prefixed names, because `.age`, `.row-title`, `.lede` and `.actions` all exist scoped in other components and an unscoped global would leak into them — which means editing the shipped rules sweep, blind, inside a step whose acceptance is the operator looking at a different surface.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -34,6 +34,15 @@ export interface Note {
|
||||
is_task: boolean;
|
||||
note_type: NoteType;
|
||||
task_kind?: TaskKind;
|
||||
// The note's own check (milestone 317). Empty on almost every note — that
|
||||
// is the normal case: a note with no `verify_with` is a DECISION, and there
|
||||
// is nothing to go and check. Only a note asserting a fact about something
|
||||
// outside the operator's control carries one. `verified_at` null while
|
||||
// `verify_with` is set means NOBODY HAS EVER CONFIRMED IT, which is the
|
||||
// state the sweep ranks first.
|
||||
verify_with?: string;
|
||||
expires_when?: string;
|
||||
verified_at?: string | null;
|
||||
systems?: System[];
|
||||
arose_from_id?: number | null;
|
||||
created_at: string;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user