feat(lessons): the document shape is the stored record, and it travels (#3730)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 51s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 53s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m31s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 25s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 51s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 53s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m31s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 25s
Milestone 385 step 3 — the step where the kind either works or is cosmetic.
THE DOCUMENT, and why there is no `lesson_document()` beside `rule_document()`
in embeddings. The step expected one. The difference is where the sharp shape
LIVES. A rule keeps its trigger in a column and its title is a plain name, so
`{title} — {trigger}` has to be synthesised at embed time and exists nowhere
else. A snippet — the only sharp record in the corpus by #2485's measurement,
0.153 top-to-second against 0.010–0.023 — gets there the other way: its STORED
title is already the join and its stored body already opens with the trigger,
so the ordinary `title\nbody` join IS the sharp document. Step 1 chose the
snippet route and step 2 built it, so `lessons.lesson_document` composes what
is STORED and the generic chunker does the rest.
The consequence the step asked about: `chunk_document` is untouched, so
CHUNKER_VERSION does not move and NOTHING re-embeds. The step's "Re-embed"
section describes a change this design does not make.
THE NARRATIVE stays in the body, departing from the step's instruction to keep
it out. `rule_document` excludes `why` because long dated narrative made
sixteen dev-logs land on the centroid of "development" — but that finding
predates chunking (#280). A body over budget is now split, and every chunk is
prefixed with the title, which for a lesson carries the trigger. The story
occupies its own vectors instead of averaging itself into the trigger's, and
each of those is still anchored to when the lesson applies. A guard asserts
exactly that. Holding the story out would cost the reader the only part that
explains the insight, to buy a sharpness the chunker already provides.
GLOBAL IN THE SEARCH is the real new code: `GLOBAL_NOTE_TYPES` and
`include_global_kinds` on `semantic_search_notes`, widening the PROJECT filter
alone. Off by default, because two callers depend on that filter holding — the
near-duplicate gate compares a record only against its own project on purpose,
and a globally visible kind there would let a lesson block an unrelated note's
create on a project its author never touched. It composes with `note_type`
rather than overriding it, so narrowing to snippets does not quietly acquire
lessons, and it changes nothing about the ACL: `notes_visibility_clause` still
gates every row.
Wired into the explicit MCP search only — the operator asked, and there is no
budget to spend. The unasked-for injection arms are step 5's subject (#3732)
and the legibility of a lesson appearing on a foreign project is step 7's
(#3734), so neither is turned on here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01821k5B3Ysecp9fNYs92Kuy
This commit is contained in:
@@ -508,6 +508,25 @@ async def upsert_note_embedding(
|
||||
logger.warning("Failed to persist embedding for note %d", note_id, exc_info=True)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Kinds that belong to no single project, and are therefore reachable from a
|
||||
# project-scoped search of a DIFFERENT project when a caller asks for them
|
||||
# (milestone 385 step 3).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# A lesson is the whole reason this exists. "A better way to think about this
|
||||
# problem" is not true only where it was learned, and a lesson confined to its
|
||||
# origin project would be unreachable exactly where it is most useful — on the
|
||||
# next project, which is the case the kind was created for (#3727).
|
||||
# `semantic_search_rules` has always had this property: it scopes by OWNERSHIP
|
||||
# rather than by what binds a given project, because "is there a rule about
|
||||
# this" is a question asked across a whole rulebook. A lesson asks the same
|
||||
# kind of question.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Spelled as a literal rather than imported from `services.lessons`, which
|
||||
# imports `trigger_title` from this module and would close a cycle. A guard
|
||||
# pins the two equal instead.
|
||||
GLOBAL_NOTE_TYPES: tuple[str, ...] = ("lesson",)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# Both searches rank WITHOUT the threshold and apply it in Python, so the best
|
||||
# rejected score stays observable (#3670). The qualifying set is provably
|
||||
# unchanged: rows arrive ordered by distance ascending, so every above-bar row
|
||||
@@ -536,6 +555,7 @@ async def semantic_search_notes(
|
||||
note_type: str | Sequence[str] | None = None,
|
||||
task_kind: str | Sequence[str] | None = None,
|
||||
orphan_only: bool = False,
|
||||
include_global_kinds: bool = False,
|
||||
scope: str = "own",
|
||||
demote_superseded: bool = True,
|
||||
system_id: int | None = None,
|
||||
@@ -570,6 +590,19 @@ async def semantic_search_notes(
|
||||
alone can express it. With `note_type="note", task_kind="issue"` a caller
|
||||
gets fixed problems and durable notes without the open to-do list.
|
||||
|
||||
`include_global_kinds` lets a project-scoped search ALSO reach the kinds in
|
||||
GLOBAL_NOTE_TYPES — records that belong to no single project — so a lesson
|
||||
written on one project is found from another. It widens the PROJECT filter
|
||||
only: a caller that also passes `note_type` still gets exactly the kinds it
|
||||
asked for, so narrowing to snippets does not quietly acquire lessons.
|
||||
|
||||
Off by default, because two callers depend on the project filter holding.
|
||||
The near-duplicate gate compares a record only against its own project on
|
||||
purpose, and a globally-visible kind would let a lesson block an unrelated
|
||||
note's create on a project its author never touched. Ordinary note recall
|
||||
is project-scoped for the same reason — the point of the carve-out is that
|
||||
ONE kind escapes, not that scoping is weaker.
|
||||
|
||||
`scope` ("own" | "browse" | "read", see access.notes_visibility_clause)
|
||||
decides how far this may see. It exists because this one function serves
|
||||
three different kinds of act: an explicit search, which should reach
|
||||
@@ -631,7 +664,12 @@ async def semantic_search_notes(
|
||||
if orphan_only:
|
||||
stmt = stmt.where(Note.project_id.is_(None))
|
||||
elif project_id is not None:
|
||||
stmt = stmt.where(Note.project_id == project_id)
|
||||
in_project = Note.project_id == project_id
|
||||
if include_global_kinds:
|
||||
in_project = or_(
|
||||
in_project, Note.note_type.in_(GLOBAL_NOTE_TYPES)
|
||||
)
|
||||
stmt = stmt.where(in_project)
|
||||
# Narrow to records tagged to one System (subsystem/area). An
|
||||
# association filter, not a ranking signal — membership in the
|
||||
# candidate set, decided before scoring, like project_id above.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user