feat(rules): the write path can notice a standing rule it was never given (#3031, milestone 307 step 5, hook arm)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 26s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 33s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m7s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 24s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 26s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 33s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m7s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 24s
A conditional rule is not resident, so a session can be about to violate one it was never handed. This arm notices: when what is being written resembles a rule's trigger, the hint names it and says to read it before deciding it does not apply. A SUGGESTION, and the plan was wrong about why it could be more. It claimed the hook "already resolves a path to an area" — it does not, and nothing in Scribe maps a path to a System or a canonical area (build_write_path_hint resolves paths against snippet LOCATIONS, a different index; the learned-alias idea belongs to another project). Correction logged on the task. Rather than invent path→area inference to make a stale claim true, the arm does what D7 already decided and what this surface already IS: tags bind at enter_project, meaning suggests here. The header of the hook says NEVER BLOCKS; dressing a hint up as binding would have been the actual mistake. CONDITIONAL RULES ONLY. An always-on rule is already in the session, so re-offering it is noise — and noise on a hint that fires on every write is how a hint gets ignored. Telemetry goes to retrieval_logs, NOT note_usage_events, and that is a correctness call rather than a preference: note_usage ids are REMAPPED on a backup restore, so a rule id written there would come back attached to whatever note took that number — silently corrupting the evidence the next true-up is supposed to read. retrieval_logs is never restored and `source` already separates surfaces. record_retrieval's `results` type widened to match what it actually needs (an `.id`), instead of passing a Rule to something annotated Note. The rule dedup gets its OWN state file and query parameter, like the three channels before it — #2708's lesson was that one shared channel lets a hint of one class silence a different class that had never been shown. Plugin version bumped: a hook change clients cannot see did not ship (#1040). The stub is autouse in conftest rather than added to forty-odd call sites: the arm loads an embedding model, and every existing test that stubs the NOTES search would otherwise pull a real model in through the one arm it had no way to know about. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -129,6 +129,11 @@ async def write_path_prior_art():
|
||||
surfaced. A separate channel on purpose: a reuse
|
||||
hint shown early must not suppress the record-sync
|
||||
nudge when the recorded file is edited later.
|
||||
exclude_rule_ids (opt) — comma-separated RULE ids already surfaced
|
||||
this session. Its own channel like the three
|
||||
above, and for the same reason: a rule named
|
||||
twenty turns ago should not be re-offered on
|
||||
every subsequent write.
|
||||
exclude_derive (opt) — comma-separated derive keys (a derive group id
|
||||
or `canon:<snippet_id>`) already named this
|
||||
session by the ledger arm (#2900); its own
|
||||
@@ -151,6 +156,7 @@ async def write_path_prior_art():
|
||||
exclude_derive = [
|
||||
p.strip() for p in (request.args.get("exclude_derive") or "").split(",") if p.strip()
|
||||
]
|
||||
exclude_rule_ids = _int_list(request.args.get("exclude_rule_ids"))
|
||||
shapes = _parse_shapes(request.args.get("shapes") or "")
|
||||
api_key = getattr(g, "api_key", None)
|
||||
may_stamp = api_key is None or getattr(api_key, "scope", "") == "write"
|
||||
@@ -161,6 +167,7 @@ async def write_path_prior_art():
|
||||
stamp_shapes=shapes if may_stamp else None,
|
||||
repo_key=repo_bindings_svc.normalize_repo_key(repo) if repo else "",
|
||||
exclude_derive=exclude_derive,
|
||||
exclude_rule_ids=exclude_rule_ids,
|
||||
)
|
||||
return jsonify(result)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user