Files
FabledGrimoire/tests/test_session_slippage_readout.py
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5 f1d26f01e2
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 13s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 53s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m1s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m54s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 32s
rename(547): three hook-shell tests call the renamed functions
The step-3 sweep matched `scribe` only after a non-letter, and in these
three tests the shell call sits right after a `\n` escape in a Python
string, so the character before it was the letter n. They still called
scribe_recent_context, scribe_skip_prompt and scribe_checkpoint_allowed;
they now call the grimoire_ names. No other escape-adjacent occurrence
remains in the tree.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-22 11:01:11 -04:00

327 lines
14 KiB
Python

"""Which rules fired this session, which changed an action, which did not.
WHY THIS CANNOT BE ASKED OF THE SERVER
`rule_usage_events` has no session column — it is per user over a window — so
a SESSION-scoped answer has to be assembled where a session is a thing that
exists. That is the plugin, from four ledgers four hooks already write:
.rules.ids an arm NAMED the rule (a teaser was shown)
.opened.ids the session called get_rule
.acted.ids the session called rule_outcome
.checkpoint.ids the rule HELD an act
EVERY LINE IS AN OBSERVED TOOL CALL. Nothing asks the model what it followed,
because a model asked "did you apply rule 156?" will say yes. These record
what happened.
WHY THE COMPACTION SEAM
A rule read and left unresolved is invisible by construction — it looks
exactly like a rule that worked. The compaction is where that invisibility
becomes permanent: the turns holding the evidence are summarised away, and an
unjudged thing that survives as nothing is how a decision quietly becomes
nobody's. A PreCompact hook's stdout becomes the summariser's instructions,
so this does not say "you slipped" — it says which ids must be
carried through, which is the one thing a summary can do about it.
WHAT IS PINNED: the arithmetic, and which conditions produce which lines. NOT
pinned: the wording.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
import os
import subprocess
import time
from pathlib import Path
import pytest
from tests.helpers import need_tools
ROOT = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1]
HOOKS = ROOT / "plugin" / "hooks"
DEFS = HOOKS / "grimoire_defs.sh"
PRECOMPACT = HOOKS / "grimoire_precompact_preserve.sh"
RECORDER = HOOKS / "grimoire_record_outcome.sh"
HOOKS_JSON = HOOKS / "hooks.json"
def sh(script: str) -> str:
need_tools("bash", "awk")
r = subprocess.run(
["bash", "-c", f'set -uo pipefail\n. "{DEFS}"\n{script}'],
capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=30,
)
assert r.returncode == 0, f"exit {r.returncode}: {r.stderr}"
return r.stdout
def ledgers(tmp_path, *, named=(), opened=(), acted=(), held=()) -> Path:
"""The four ledgers, written THROUGH THE REAL WRITERS.
Not hand-rolled files: `grimoire_rules_append` is what creates the evidence
twin these read from, so a fixture that wrote the bytes itself would keep
passing if the twin stopped being written.
"""
d = tmp_path / "grimoire-priorart"
d.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
script = []
for name, ids in (("rules", named), ("opened", opened), ("acted", acted)):
if ids:
body = "".join(f"{i}\n" for i in ids)
script.append(
f"printf '%s' '{body}' | grimoire_rules_append \"{d}/s.{name}.ids\""
)
for i in held:
script.append(f'grimoire_checkpoint_allowed "{d}/s.checkpoint.ids" {i} >/dev/null')
if script:
sh("\n".join(script))
return d
def readout(d: Path) -> str:
return sh(f'grimoire_slippage_lines "{d}" "s"')
# ── The arithmetic ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def minus(a: str, b: str) -> str:
return sh(f'grimoire_ids_minus "{a}" "{b}"').strip()
def test_the_difference_keeps_order_and_drops_members():
assert minus("1 9 34 156 173", "9 34 156") == "1 173"
def test_an_empty_difference_prints_nothing():
assert minus("9 34", "9 34") == ""
def test_an_empty_minuend_is_not_an_error():
assert minus("", "9") == ""
def test_a_repeated_id_is_counted_once():
"""The ledgers are append-only, so the same rule can appear many times."""
assert minus("9 9 34 9", "") == "9 34"
# ── What the readout says ─────────────────────────────────────────────────
def test_the_readout_names_what_was_read(tmp_path):
out = readout(ledgers(tmp_path, named=[1, 9], opened=[9]))
assert "read: 9" in out
def test_a_rule_named_and_never_opened_is_named_as_such(tmp_path):
"""The arm talking to nobody. Not an accusation — a teaser skimmed past
leaves nothing behind — but it is the number that says whether the arm is
earning its place."""
out = readout(ledgers(tmp_path, named=[1, 9, 173], opened=[9]))
assert "never opened" in out
line = next(ln for ln in out.splitlines() if "never opened" in ln)
assert "1" in line and "173" in line
assert " 9" not in line.split(":")[1], "an opened rule is not also unread"
def test_a_rule_read_with_no_outcome_is_the_headline(tmp_path):
"""THE MILESTONE'S WHOLE SUBJECT. Read and unresolved is arithmetically
identical to read and followed, and this is the only place that difference
gets carried across the seam."""
out = readout(ledgers(tmp_path, named=[9, 34], opened=[9, 34], acted=[34]))
assert "READ WITH NO OUTCOME RECORDED" in out
line = next(ln for ln in out.splitlines() if "NO OUTCOME" in ln)
assert "9" in line
assert "rule_outcome" in line, "a finding with no remedy is a complaint"
def test_a_rule_that_held_an_act_is_reported_separately(tmp_path):
"""The strongest evidence a rule changed something: it stopped a call
before it ran. Kept apart from `read` because reading a rule and
having it alter what you did are different claims."""
out = readout(ledgers(tmp_path, named=[156], opened=[156], held=[156]))
assert "held an act" in out and "156" in out
def test_a_session_that_resolved_everything_makes_no_accusation(tmp_path):
"""Traffic is always reported — it is what the static instructions above
already ask for in prose. The SUBTRACTIONS are conditional, so a clean
session gets no scolding. '0 rules unresolved' on every compaction is how
a readout teaches its reader to skip it."""
out = readout(ledgers(tmp_path, named=[7], opened=[7], acted=[7]))
assert "read: 7" in out
assert "NO OUTCOME" not in out
assert "never opened" not in out
def test_a_session_no_rule_touched_says_nothing_at_all(tmp_path):
"""A fresh install must not be told something is
wrong when the truth is that nothing has happened yet."""
d = tmp_path / "grimoire-priorart"
d.mkdir(parents=True)
assert readout(d).strip() == ""
# ── The hook that carries it ──────────────────────────────────────────────
def run_precompact(event: dict, tmpdir: Path) -> subprocess.CompletedProcess:
need_tools("bash")
env = dict(os.environ)
env["TMPDIR"] = str(tmpdir)
return subprocess.run(["bash", str(PRECOMPACT)], input=json.dumps(event),
capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=30, env=env)
def test_the_compaction_hook_appends_the_readout(tmp_path):
ledgers(tmp_path, named=[1, 9], opened=[9], acted=[])
r = run_precompact({"session_id": "s", "trigger": "manual"}, tmp_path)
assert r.returncode == 0
assert "Preserve the following literally" in r.stdout, "static half intact"
assert "READ WITH NO OUTCOME RECORDED" in r.stdout
def test_the_compaction_hook_still_exits_zero_with_no_session(tmp_path):
"""An event with no session_id has no ledgers to read. The static
instructions still go out — they are the part that matters most, and
losing them because a measurement was unavailable would be the worse
trade."""
r = run_precompact({"trigger": "auto"}, tmp_path)
assert r.returncode == 0
assert "Preserve the following literally" in r.stdout
def test_the_compaction_hook_never_emits_a_json_envelope(tmp_path):
"""Regression guard on the change that added the readout: for PreCompact
the envelope is pasted into the summariser's prompt rather than
unwrapped."""
ledgers(tmp_path, named=[1], opened=[1])
r = run_precompact({"session_id": "s", "trigger": "manual"}, tmp_path)
assert not r.stdout.lstrip().startswith("{")
# ── The recorder that makes `acted` mean anything ─────────────────────────
def run_recorder(event: dict, tmpdir: Path) -> subprocess.CompletedProcess:
need_tools("bash")
env = {"PATH": os.environ["PATH"], "HOME": str(tmpdir), "TMPDIR": str(tmpdir)}
return subprocess.run(["bash", str(RECORDER)], input=json.dumps(event),
capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=30, env=env)
def test_declaring_an_outcome_is_recorded(tmp_path):
r = run_recorder(
{"session_id": "s", "tool_input": {"rule_id": 156, "outcome": "applied"}},
tmp_path,
)
assert r.returncode == 0
assert (tmp_path / "grimoire-priorart" / "s.acted.ids").read_text().startswith("156\t")
def test_the_entry_is_stamped_like_its_siblings(tmp_path):
"""One reader ages all three ledgers, so all three carry a timestamp."""
run_recorder({"session_id": "s", "tool_input": {"rule_id": 9}}, tmp_path)
line = (tmp_path / "grimoire-priorart" / "s.acted.ids").read_text().strip()
assert "\t" in line and line.split("\t")[1].isdigit()
@pytest.mark.parametrize("event", [
{}, {"session_id": "s"}, {"tool_input": {"rule_id": 9}},
{"session_id": "s", "tool_input": {"rule_id": "not-a-number"}},
])
def test_an_unusable_event_records_nothing_and_still_exits_zero(event, tmp_path):
"""A bookkeeping failure must never turn a successful tool call into a
hook error."""
r = run_recorder(event, tmp_path)
assert r.returncode == 0
assert not (tmp_path / "grimoire-priorart" / "s.acted.ids").exists()
def test_the_recorder_is_registered_on_the_rule_outcome_tool():
"""A ledger nothing writes to reads as 'nothing was acted on', which is
the exact false finding this milestone exists to avoid producing."""
cfg = json.loads(HOOKS_JSON.read_text())
entries = cfg["hooks"]["PostToolUse"]
assert any(
"rule_outcome" in e.get("matcher", "")
and any("grimoire_record_outcome.sh" in h["command"] for h in e["hooks"])
for e in entries
)
def test_the_recorder_is_shell_valid():
need_tools("bash")
subprocess.run(["bash", "-n", str(RECORDER)], check=True)
# ── Evidence outlives the compaction; exclusions do not ───────────────────
#
# Two jobs with opposite lifetimes: "this context holds the rule" (must be
# forgotten at a compaction, and three hooks depend on that) and "this was
# opened" (which no compaction makes untrue). One ledger doing both loses
# nearly every opened rule to the sweep, which is correct only for the first.
def test_the_readout_is_unchanged_by_the_sweep(tmp_path):
"""The readout runs AT the compaction. If the sweep took its inputs it
would report only the last stretch of a session and read as though it had
reported all of it."""
d = ledgers(tmp_path, named=[9, 34, 156], opened=[9, 156], acted=[156], held=[156])
before = readout(d)
sh(f'TMPDIR="{tmp_path}" grimoire_clear_session_ledgers s')
assert readout(d) == before
assert "READ WITH NO OUTCOME RECORDED: 9" in readout(d)
def test_the_sweep_still_clears_what_the_context_no_longer_holds(tmp_path):
"""The other half, and it must keep working: after a compaction the agent
genuinely does not hold what it was shown, so an arm that stayed quiet on
the strength of the old ledger would be silent about a rule the context
has lost."""
d = ledgers(tmp_path, named=[9], opened=[9])
sh(f'TMPDIR="{tmp_path}" grimoire_clear_session_ledgers s')
assert not (d / "s.rules.ids").exists()
assert not (d / "s.opened.ids").exists()
assert (d / "s.opened.keep.ids").exists()
def test_the_evidence_twin_is_not_aged_out(tmp_path):
"""An exclusion ledger ages by TTL, and should: a rule named two hours ago
is not in this context. A rule OPENED two hours ago was still opened."""
d = tmp_path / "grimoire-priorart"
d.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
stale = int(time.time()) - 99999
(d / "s.opened.keep.ids").write_text(f"9\t{stale}\n")
(d / "s.rules.keep.ids").write_text(f"9\t{stale}\n")
assert "read: 9" in readout(d)
def test_every_ledger_written_through_the_appender_gets_a_twin(tmp_path):
"""Derived in one place rather than listed at the call sites — a list is
what broke this before, and the next ledger somebody adds should be born
on the right side without anyone remembering to say so."""
d = tmp_path / "grimoire-priorart"
d.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
sh(f"""printf '7\n' | grimoire_rules_append "{d}/s.brandnew.ids" """)
assert (d / "s.brandnew.keep.ids").read_text().startswith("7\t")
sh(f'TMPDIR="{tmp_path}" grimoire_clear_session_ledgers s')
assert (d / "s.brandnew.keep.ids").exists()
def test_a_checkpoint_budget_is_restored_by_a_compaction(tmp_path):
"""The cap counts the SWEPT file on purpose. After a compaction this
context has not read the rule, so the budget to stop an act on it is
honestly fresh — while the record that a stop already happened stays."""
d = tmp_path / "grimoire-priorart"
d.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
f = d / "s.checkpoint.ids"
sh(f'grimoire_checkpoint_allowed "{f}" 156 >/dev/null')
r = subprocess.run(
["bash", "-c", f'. "{DEFS}"\ngrimoire_checkpoint_allowed "{f}" 156'],
capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=30,
)
assert r.returncode != 0, "a rule does not get to stop the same session twice"
sh(f'TMPDIR="{tmp_path}" grimoire_clear_session_ledgers s')
sh(f'grimoire_checkpoint_allowed "{f}" 156 >/dev/null')
assert (d / "s.checkpoint.keep.ids").read_text().count("156") == 2