Commit Graph
2 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5 79655fd19f docs(6207): the remaining migrations state their rationale in terms of the data
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 13s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 59s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m32s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 2m33s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 26s
Record, milestone, phase and plan citations go from every migration header;
the "end before start" fix (0043) and the suppressed-count column (0095)
state the condition they prevent rather than the incident. 0053 and 0055
pointed at design specs under docs/superpowers that are not in the repo;
those pointers are removed.

Kept: alembic's generated "Create Date:" headers (template metadata, not
rationale), 0121's ARM_BORN justification beside the constant, and 0051's
illustrative "update task 42" format example.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-21 20:49:32 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 c63172272d feat(rules): a preference is a rule that does not bind (#3849 step 1)
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 54s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m4s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 1m11s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Adds `kind` to rules — `rule` binds, `preference` is how the operator wants
work done. One column, because the two differ in exactly one dimension and
everything else a preference needs already lives on `rules`: a trigger
column, a trigger-dominated embedding document, ownership-scoped search,
three retrieval arms with telemetry, typed relations, and versioning.

Defaults to `rule`, so nothing changes force on upgrade — 0088's argument
for `tier`, unchanged.

`rule_versions` gets the column too, and that half is not bookkeeping.
`record_if_changed` decides whether an edit deserves a snapshot by comparing
the fields a version carries, so a field absent from SNAPSHOT_FIELDS is a
field whose change records no history at all. Without it, turning a rule
into a preference — the moment something stops binding, and the single most
consequential edit either kind can undergo — would leave the history silent.

Backup carries it through all four seams. A missed one would have restored
every preference as a rule, quietly.

Guarded on real Postgres in three halves: a preference writes, a typo is
refused (without which every other assertion would pass against a table
whose CHECK had been dropped), and a row written with no kind reads back as
`rule` — the migration's whole safety claim, asserted rather than assumed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011cPyzNnegXHr5iRMzzy5KJ
2026-09-10 21:14:29 -04:00