3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5	914f31359c	docs(6209): the remaining test files — lessons, reply moment and shape, retrieval specs and scopes, rule doors and judgments, services, snippets, search scope; five tests renamed to their property ... Docstrings, section headers and assertion messages drop the record number, milestone or step that introduced the behaviour, and incident accounts are restated as the present-tense failure shape. A dead pointer to a design doc that is not in the repo is removed. Renamed to the property they check: test_the_old_shape_would_be_caught -> test_a_rank_then_scope_query_is_caught test_a_ledger_repeat_no_longer_produces_that_case_at_all -> test_a_ledger_repeat_is_counted_not_withheld test_the_header_no_longer_promises_once_per_session -> test_the_header_explains_the_seen_marker test_the_portal_case_no_longer_stamps_one_canon_onto_a_whole_file -> test_one_canon_is_not_stamped_onto_a_whole_file test_the_repos_own_prose_no_longer_defines_with -> test_the_repos_own_prose_does_not_define_with test_the_original_regression_create_note_with_content -> test_the_real_server_refuses_content_on_create_note Fixture and example ids stay: "note 5" in a supersession chain, "rule 156" in an illustrative question, `#2275` as the hex-versus-citation case, `#3244` as the example of a bare number, fixed dates in date-filter tests. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-10-21 21:44:58 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Fable 5	89b07f7857	feat(forge): push webhook flags drift at the moment the repo moves (#2691) ... Second adapter consumer. POST /api/webhooks/forge validates Gitea's X-Gitea-Signature (HMAC-SHA256, constant-time; no secret configured = the endpoint 404s out of existence), extracts changed/removed paths, and flags matched snippets by writing verification.invalidated_by {commit_sha, at, path, removed} — the existing attention vocabulary extended, not a new flag: needs_attention includes it, both filter dialects (Python + jsonpath SQL) include it in 'attention' and exclude it from 'ok', and recording ANY fresh verdict clears it by construction because compose_verification builds a new dict. Unverified snippets are skipped (already in their own bucket); replayed deliveries at the same head commit are no-ops; processing failures return 200 with a WARNING + AppLog canary so the forge never marks deliveries failed and operators never disable the hook over a transient (#2663's lesson). Matching goes through repo BINDINGS: recorded location repos are free-form names ('Scribe') that cannot address a forge, so a snippet reaches its forge repo through its project's binding — which also fixes step 5's pull-time resolution for every real record via the same fallback. O(bindings + snippets-in-project + changed files). Settings: webhook secret beside the forge config (masked, sentinel- skipped, Docker-secret env channel, endpoint documented in the UI). Tests: signature gate, payload parsing, path semantics, both filter dialects extended in the drift-check guard file, and real-Postgres end-to-end (flag lands, attention lists it, replay quiet, re-verify clears, unbound repo untouched). Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-16 13:05:00 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	35f3f09d12	feat(snippets): drift check — verify a snippet still matches its source ... A recorded snippet points at a repo · path · symbol that WILL rot: files move, symbols get renamed, implementations diverge from the copy stored here. Nothing detected any of it, so a record degraded silently from "canonical reference" to "confidently wrong" — worse than no record, since it is surfaced with the same authority either way. WHERE THE CHECK RUNS. Agent-side, which the task flagged as the design question to settle first. Scribe has no checkout of the operator's repos and must not acquire one: giving the server repo access would make every install a credential problem and break instance-agnosticism (rule #115). The agent already has the working tree, so it does the comparing; the server remembers the verdict, makes it queryable, and knows when it has expired. New MCP tool verify_snippet teaches the four-step procedure and records the result; a REST endpoint mirrors it so the UI can clear a marker after a manual fix. WHY THE VERDICT CARRIES A CODE HASH. A verdict describes the code it was checked against. Invalidating it on edit means deciding which edits count — a when_to_use tweak shouldn't void a code check, a rewrite must — which is fiddly and easy to get subtly wrong, and easy for a new write path to forget entirely. Stamping the verdict with a hash sidesteps all of it: one whose code_sha no longer matches is self-evidently expired, computed at read time, no invalidation branch to maintain. That makes "expired" the interesting filter case. It is not `drifted` (nothing was found wrong) and not `unverified` (a check did happen), yet it plainly needs looking at — so `verification=attention` covers both. To keep that one index-served predicate rather than a post-filter that would make the pagination total a lie, data now also mirrors the CURRENT code's fingerprint as data.code_sha, and a jsonpath compares the two fields within the row. The filter is implemented in both dialects, SQL and Python, for the same reason the location filter is: the semantic arm's candidates arrive already fetched. A merge deliberately carries no verdict forward — the survivor's code is a union of several sources, so no prior check describes it, and unverified is the honest answer. UI: a danger-toned drift badge on each card (an actively misleading record outranks a merely unused one), and a "Needs attention" filter. Its empty state says plainly that never-verified snippets don't appear there — otherwise `attention` would mean "everything" on day one and be useless as a worklist. Refs #2086 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs	2026-07-28 18:20:33 -04:00