Files
FabledCurator/.forgejo/workflows
bvandeusen dee93faa37
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 5s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 6s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 18s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 22s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 29s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m50s
ci: shadow the label-based reuse key before trusting it (318 step 3)
Additive and inert. Every build now stamps `fc.revision` as an image label,
and a diagnostic step tries to read it back off the channel tag. Nothing
downstream reads either yet — the reuse check still keys on the r-<rev> tag.

The question step 3 has to answer before committing: can the reuse check be
keyed on a LABEL read off the channel tag instead of on a separate tag? If
it can, nothing is minted per build, the -main/-dev identity split
disappears with CHANNELLED, and #3154's base-refresh clobber stops existing
rather than needing a workaround. It also closes a defect found in what
already shipped: r-<rev> tags do not match the registry's keep_pattern
(#3157), so they are prunable, and a pruned identity tag silently costs a
rebuild. A label cannot be pruned — it rides inside a tag that must exist.

Three probes rather than one, because `--format` templating over .Image
varies by buildx version and one round trip per guess is a poor trade.

Two questions, answered at different times, and conflating them would
abandon a working design:

1. Do the template mechanics work here? Answered on the first run — if the
   probes print a labels map, even an empty one, `--format` resolves on this
   buildx and this registry. That is the real gate.
2. Does a value round-trip? Only once an artifact genuinely rebuilds. This
   push touches build.yml, which is in no path set, so all three artifacts
   reuse and stamp nothing. Expect no values this run.

That second point is the migration path rather than a defect: under the real
mechanism "no label" reads as a MISS, so each artifact rebuilds once and is
stamped from then on — one extra build per artifact, ever, in the safe
direction. `imagetools create` cannot backfill it, since it copies a
manifest and config labels are not manifest annotations.
2026-08-28 14:00:09 -04:00
..