Files
FabledCurator/alembic
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 dc8af8b1a7
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 23s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 30s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 55s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 1m45s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / integration (push) Successful in 1m49s
feat: a learned roster, so a stopped part is observable (milestone 365 steps 1-2)
Nothing in FabledCurator knew what was SUPPOSED to be running. `celery
inspect` reports the workers that ANSWER, so a dead worker was a shorter list
rather than a red light, and grep for any notion of expected services returned
nothing. That is why Portainer was the only place an operator could see it:
Portainer knows the intended set.

`service_seen` is the memory that makes an absence observable — every part
that has checked in, and when it last did.

**Keyed on the queue set, not the worker hostname.** Celery's worker names
here are `celery@<container id>`, minted fresh on every deploy. Keyed on those,
this table would record a death and a birth every time the stack updates — and
a status page that goes red on every deploy is a status page nobody reads,
which is worse than not having one. CELERY_QUEUES is assigned per role in
compose and survives container replacement, so it is the stable identity. Two
replicas of a role are therefore ONE row, which is right: the question is
whether the role is served, not how many containers exist.

The GPU agent is keyed on agent_id, the identity its lease protocol already
uses. gpu.py received it on both lease and heartbeat and threw it away — an
idle agent with nothing to lease left no trace and was indistinguishable from
one switched off a week ago. Now recorded on the calls that were already
happening.

**Who observes, corrected from the plan.** The plan said "record from the
existing inspect path", which would only run when someone opened the Activity
tab. Two other candidates and why they lost:

- A beat sweep. If the scheduler dies the sweep stops, every row goes stale,
  and the page says everything is down when one thing is. An alarm that cannot
  distinguish "a part died" from "the observer died" is worse than none.
- A background task in web. hypercorn runs --workers 4, so that is four
  concurrent inspect loops per container, forever.

Taken instead: refresh on demand, rate-limited by the newest last_seen_at that
every process can already see. The observer is then the thing serving the page
— if web is down you get a browser error, not a confidently green page — and
it self-limits with no coordination, since a race costs one redundant inspect
that writes identical values.

Migration 0090 is the first written on the collapsed baseline (milestone 328),
so it is also the first evidence the chain steps FORWARD from 0089 rather than
merely reproducing the schema. No secondary indexes: one row per moving part
means every read is a handful of rows, and #3301 is the record of what
speculative indexes cost.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA
2026-09-02 17:15:46 -04:00
..