CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 9s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 8s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 25s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 43s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m59s
Milestone 328 step 1 needs a baseline generated from the models, and
step 2 must not stamp the operator's live database until that baseline
is proven to reproduce what the 87-revision chain produced. `alembic
stamp` validates nothing, so an unproven baseline fails silently now and
loudly later, on real data.
There is no local Python environment and rules 10/12 point away from
standing one up, so the comparison runs in CI, where a pgvector Postgres
is already built from the chain on every integration run and nothing is
at risk.
It builds two databases and diffs their pg_dump --schema-only output:
one from `alembic upgrade head` on the revisions read out of git at
`chain_ref`, one from the current tree. Reading the chain from git via a
worktree — rather than from the working tree — is what keeps this usable
AFTER the old revisions are deleted, so it is the proof for step 1 and
the pre-flight for step 2 rather than a one-shot script.
Both sides use `alembic upgrade head`, never metadata.create_all, per
rule 82 — and that rule's reasoning is exactly the hazard here.
`create_all` emits plain CREATE TABLE and skips everything else, which is
why the optional autogenerated candidate CANNOT be trusted as the answer.
Three things in this schema are invisible to SQLAlchemy metadata:
CREATE EXTENSION vector (0001)
CREATE EXTENSION tsm_system_rows (0004)
the HNSW index on image_record.siglip_embedding, raw SQL because
alembic's create_index cannot express USING hnsw (...) (0036)
plus any CHECK constraint or server_default a migration added without the
model declaring it — 4 model files declare CheckConstraints against 6
migrations that touch them. The candidate is a starting point to hand
finish; the diff is what proves nothing was missed.
Results are printed to the job log rather than uploaded: ci-requirements
records that this runner cannot do actions/upload-artifact@v4+, and the
repo dropped the action entirely in 2026-05.
Run it first with the chain still present, as a control — the diff
compares the chain against itself and must come back clean. A clean diff
after the squash only means something if the harness was shown to be
capable of producing one beforehand.
Temporary. Delete once the baseline is stamped.