Files
FabledCurator/.forgejo/workflows
bvandeusen b3989d0224
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 3s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 3s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 19s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 42s
Build images / build-agent (push) Failing after 2m33s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m44s
extension / lint (pull_request) Successful in 25s
fix(ci): the repoint was destroying the label it depends on
Reuse worked exactly once per artifact, then every later push rebuilt at full
price. Nothing failed and nothing went red — the savings simply evaporated.

`imagetools create` wraps its source manifest in an INDEX. The repoint step
passed the channel tag as both source and target, so after any reuse :dev
stopped being a plain image, `.Image.Config.Labels` no longer resolved
through it, and fc.revision read as absent on the next push.

Observed across three runs rather than reasoned about: run 4749 read
fc.revision=a7e626a67a79 off fabledcurator-ml:dev and skipped the build; run
4751 read <none> off the same tag and rebuilt. The only thing to touch it in
between was 4749's own repoint. The agent hit in 4751 precisely because its
:dev had last been written by a real build, not by a repoint — which is the
control case.

Milestone 313's r-<rev> design was immune without anyone noticing why: the
source (the identity tag) was never one of the targets. Step 3 made the
channel tag both, and inherited a bug the earlier shape had avoided by
accident.

Fix: exclude the source from the target list, so the channel tag is only ever
written by a real build and stays a plain readable image. On dev that leaves
nothing to do, which is correct — the hit already established that :dev
points at the right content. On main it leaves :c-<sha>, which rule 145
requires of every main push whether or not a build ran.

Also added a note the reuse step prints when a channel tag exists but carries
no readable label. That is expected exactly once per artifact during the
migration; if it appears on every push, the tag is being index-wrapped again
and reuse is dead. This class of failure — correct behaviour, quietly worth
less than it reads — is the third one this milestone has turned up, and it is
the one that does not announce itself.
2026-08-28 14:55:49 -04:00
..