Files
FabledCurator/.forgejo/workflows
bvandeusen 239b1ed8d9
Build images / sign-extension (push) Skipped
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 23s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 29s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 30s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 2m23s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 3m20s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m52s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 9m26s
ci: build :dev images again so the dev channel can carry a build
build.yml triggered on main and tags only. The 2026-05-26 comment gave
the reason: "operator tests from :latest after merge-to-main, not from
the dev branch image. Saves one full docker build per dev push."

That trade has since been named as a fault. Family rule 147 — main IS
production, test on :dev, never by shipping — and rule 146 — a rolling
channel refreshes itself, and a channel that can only be refreshed by
shipping is not a channel. 146's note on 147 describes this exact shape:
the pressure to test by shipping does not come from carelessness, it
comes from :dev being unable to carry the build.

Two live consequences, not hypotheticals:
  - docker-compose.yml pins fabledcurator:dev, an image nothing has
    published since May. The registry-image path of the documented
    quick-start could not have worked.
  - trying an extension change required merging to main, because
    sign-extension is gated to main and :dev did not exist to carry an
    XPI. Shipping was the only way to test.

All three images build on dev. Deliberate: a :dev web image paired with
a stale :dev ml or agent is a worse trap than no dev channel, because
the mismatch surfaces as a runtime failure rather than a missing tag.
The cost the 2026-05-26 note was avoiding is real and is now paid on
every dev push — layer reuse should keep ml's cost to the COPY layers,
but if it bites, narrowing is a `paths:` filter away.

:dev only. The dev path never writes :c-<sha>: that is the rollback unit
(rule 145), and a rolling tag may legitimately carry newer contents than
the :c-<sha> of the same commit.

This does NOT yet put an XPI on :dev — sign-extension is still gated to
main, and ungating it has to wait for the derived version to control
publishing, or dev would sign the hand-set 1.0.11, hit the existing
cache and ship main's stale XPI. That is the next step.
2026-08-27 09:26:58 -04:00
..