4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5	66045794f0	feat: the Backups screen says whether backups are keeping up, and the System view warns when they aren't ... - A Backups row on Settings → System and the nav dot turn amber when the newest database dump is more than a day old or failed, or the weekly bucket check found files missing that no media run has sent since. No row when backups aren't set up. - The weekly bucket check is kept as a run (kind "reconcile") with its counts, trimmed to the last 12, and listed on the Backups card. - The Backups card leads with the same verdict and the newest dump's size, shows bytes beside the running media job's file count, and lets each run open its list of failed files with why. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-11-07 17:51:39 -05:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5	cc53d8db7b	feat: a GPU agent on the CPU shows as degraded, in the System view and on its own page (4410) ... torch and onnxruntime both fall back to the CPU without raising, so the agent that ran CPU-bound for weeks after a driver update leased and checked in like a healthy one. - The agent sends its startup accel report on every lease and heartbeat. - The server keeps a bounded copy on the roster row. A running agent with a runtime off the GPU becomes `degraded`, with a sentence naming the runtime and the reason. - The top nav shows it amber. - The agent page carries a banner, and its pill reads "CPU only". Also: the bandwidth field gets the page's − / + stepper, and both number fields drop the browser's spin arrows. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR	2026-09-24 19:09:07 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	45bb7044f7	feat: the System tab reads a stored sample instead of inspecting per load (4295) ... Operator: "there is a repull every time this page loads is there a reason this info isn't being tracked in the background and stored in some way?" There was a reason and it had expired, and underneath it there was plain waste. The expired one: /api/system/workers was deliberately uncached because an operator dragging the stepper must not be shown a pre-change value. That stopped being true at 1353d34, when the UI began patching its row from the write's reply instead of refetching. The waste: size_worker_lanes already inspected the broker on a timer to decide pool sizes — computing the pool, active, reserved and queue depth the page shows, using them, and discarding them. The browser then asked the broker for the same numbers four times a minute, per open tab. So one inspect now feeds three things: the sizing decision, a stored sample (worker_lane_sample, alembic 0107), and the celery roster. No request path touches the broker at all — the roster refresh comes off /api/system/health too, where it had been rate-limited to 20s and so made worker liveness a function of whether anyone had a browser open. Consequences, stated rather than hidden: - The live figures are up to one sweep old. measured_at travels with each lane and the page says how old, because a stale number presented as current is how someone watches a queue "not move" that is moving. - The sweep is the roster's only writer now, so its period and the staleness thresholds are in a relationship. 60s against a 90s stale threshold left one missed tick between normal and all-yellow — the shape of lesson #4355 — so the period is 30s, named once in worker_lanes, and system_health asserts its headroom at import with a test stating the same thing in prose. - An idle lane therefore also gives a worker back twice as fast. That is the direction asked for: "idle instances quiet down when not running". Also bounds the inspect in push_lane_cap, which was an await with no deadline (rule 156) — harmless while it ran on a request, less so now that it runs in a background task where a hang would be silent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR	2026-09-23 18:52:08 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	fe4e0f2b71	feat: /api/system/health — one verdict for the whole stack (milestone 365 step 3) ... The single endpoint the nav indicator and the System page will both read. Composing a verdict is this module's job, not the UI's. Two kinds of part, answered differently. LEARNED — celery roles and the GPU agent, out of service_seen, where the question is "how long since it checked in" and the answer can be "it has not". PROBED — Postgres and Redis, always expected, never learned, because a last-seen for them would be actively misleading: that Redis answered thirty seconds ago says nothing about now. **The endpoint must never fail because something it checks has failed.** That inversion is easy to write by accident and it destroys the feature exactly when it is needed — a 500 when Redis is down instead of `redis: down`. Every probe is wrapped, every wait carries a deadline (rule 156), and the roster refresh swallows its own errors. The worst case is a part reported `unknown`, which is a true statement about the system. Postgres is probed first and gates the rest, because if it is unreachable nothing else can be read — and "the database is down" is the most useful single thing this can ever say. The staleness thresholds are the design risk, not the code, and they are deliberately generous: 90s to doubt, 300s to disbelieve. The constraint is a deploy rather than a crash — `docker compose up -d` rolls start-first, so a role is briefly served by two containers and then by neither while the old one drains. Thresholds tight enough to catch a crash in seconds would paint the page red on every update, and an alarm that cries wolf on every deploy is one nobody reads. Tune down only after watching a real deploy pass through. The numbers ship in the response so the UI can explain a `stale` without keeping a second copy of them. States are described in sentences rather than left as chips: "Scheduler has not checked in for 6 min — treat it as stopped" is what someone needs at the moment they are deciding whether to go and open Portainer. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA	2026-09-02 17:17:22 -04:00