2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	a9c1b421a7	feat: change a lane's slots on a running system, over the broker (4292) ... Milestone 422 step 2. `GET /api/system/workers` reports every lane joined to its live pool; `POST /api/system/workers/<name>` changes it. NO DOCKER SOCKET. Milestone 365 deferred "acting on the state" because restarting a dead worker needs a socket the web container deliberately does not have. That holds for restarting a CONTAINER; it does not hold for changing how much work a RUNNING worker does. celery's pool_grow / pool_shrink / add_consumer / cancel_consumer send a message over the Redis the app already uses, and the worker resizes itself. No new privilege, no new surface, and the security question that deferred this is never raised. PERSIST AND PUSH, in one call, in that order. pool_grow is not durable — a restart drops every lane to its env concurrency — so a UI that only pushed would lose the setting on the next deploy with nothing to show for it (lesson #4202). Storing alone would describe nothing until something restarted. A failed PUSH is not a failed setting: 200 with `applied: false` and a reason, so the UI says "saved, not yet live" rather than "that didn't work". Step 3's reconcile carries it when the lane answers again. PER-REPLICA DELTAS. `pool_grow(n, destination=[...])` adds n to EACH destination, so while `worker` runs `replicas: 2` a single delta from an aggregate is wrong for both. `slots` therefore means what CELERY_CONCURRENCY means — one process's pool — and each replica is driven to it from its OWN current size, so replicas that drifted apart converge rather than moving in lockstep. I wrote this wrong first: the docstring claimed per-replica while the code computed one delta from the max across replicas. LaneLiveState now carries `pools` per hostname and exposes `pool` as a property. A replica already at the target is sent nothing at all — the reachable fixed point step 3's periodic reconcile needs, or it re-issues a grow of zero every tick forever (lesson #4183). A replica that answered inspect but not stats is NAMED in the error rather than skipped silently, since otherwise it would run at a size the UI claims it does not. `present=False` is not "zero slots", it is "nothing answered" — kept distinct throughout, because step 3 skips an absent lane rather than correcting it. /workers now also reports pool size (from `insp.stats()`) and RESERVED count. Celery prefetches, so tasks that have left the Redis list but not started are invisible to LLEN: a lane can read depth 0 with thirty tasks held in worker memory. `pending` is depth + reserved. The UI is misleading without this and step 7's autoscaler would be simply wrong. Also kills the THIRD copy of the queue list: system_activity's _QUEUE_NAMES, whose own comment admitted the coupling ("must match celery_app.task_routes") and which sat alongside task_routes and the ROLE_NAMES copy step 1 collapsed. Now derived from LANES. The rendered order changes to lane grouping, which is the better shape for a lane-oriented UI. Separate blueprint rather than folding into system_activity, which states in its first line that it is read-only and answers a different question — its /workers is keyed on celery HOSTNAME and reports which nodes answered. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR	2026-09-22 08:01:23 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	5974a1bfbc	fix: two errors in the worker-lane tests (4291) ... Both mine, both in tests/test_worker_lanes.py, neither in the code under test. Run 7242. RUFF I001 — two blank lines between the import block and the first module-level comment. Rule 102 names this exact trap ("exactly ONE blank line between imports and a module-level constant/comment/pytestmark") and I was pointed at that rule repeatedly before opening it. SIX FAILURES in test_worker_lane_check_constraints — the test asserted bare constraint names, but Base.metadata's naming_convention has already applied the `ck_worker_lane_` prefix by the time __table__.constraints is read. The failure output is worth keeping: it shows the model emits exactly the three intended constraints, prefixed once — ck_worker_lane_slots_non_negative slots >= 0 ck_worker_lane_cap_non_negative slots_cap >= 0 ck_worker_lane_slots_within_cap slots <= slots_cap — which is the model behaving correctly, and confirms the migration's op.f() names match what the ORM produces. The assertion is now an equality against the prefixed names plus an explicit check for a doubled prefix. That is strictly more valuable than what I wrote: a bare-name assertion would have passed just as happily against `ck_worker_lane_ck_worker_lane_slots_within_cap`, which is the defect alembic 0088 had to rename four constraints for (#3275). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR	2026-09-22 07:53:30 -04:00