4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusen	fb2c4d5b80	fix(extension): packaging.sh decides the version, so it must move the version ... `packaging.sh pathspec` excluded `extension/scripts/**` — the same list web-ext ignores. But the two lists answer different questions, and this is the one place they disagree. packaging.sh is not packaged into the XPI. It does decide the version string, and build.yml stamps that string into the manifest.json that IS packaged. Changing how the version is computed therefore changes the shipped bytes, and the derivation has to see it. Harmless while every push rebuilt the web image. Step 4 made the rebuild conditional on the derived revision moving, which turns it into a silent failure: a packaging.sh change yields a NEW version, so sign-extension misses its ext-<version> cache and signs — while build-web sees an unmoved revision, reuses the published image and ships the OLD XPI. One orphaned AMO signature, and an instance serving code the registry calls current. Found while checking the ground under step 5, which changes the version format and is exactly the commit that would have hit it. Split the list rather than widening the shared one: NOT_VERSION_RELEVANT drives the pathspec, NOT_PACKAGED_TRACKED still drives web-ext's ignore list, and scripts/ stays out of the XPI. The two directions are not symmetric, which is why the version list is the narrower one — too wide costs a re-sign and a rebuild for a change that ships nothing new, too narrow serves stale bytes and says nothing. No version churn: the last packaging.sh commit predates the current extension revision, so the derived version is unchanged at 1.0.3500147 and web's revision stays a7e626a67a. Both suites now pin the disagreement from their own side, because the tempting fix for either half is to make the lists one again — version.spec.js asserts the pathspec does NOT exclude scripts while the ignore list still does, and test_artifact_paths.py asserts packaging.sh is inside the extension and web path sets.	2026-08-28 08:49:06 -04:00
bvandeusen	cd5444e3ae	ci(extension): derive the version from commit TIME, not commit count (#3092) ... Rule 149: an artifact's ordering key must be time-derived, never a commit count. packaging.sh's cmd_patch was a count. Why that matters here rather than in the abstract. A count is per-branch: dev and main count different histories of the SAME code. Today only main signs, so nothing has ordered the two against each other and the fault is invisible. The moment dev also publishes an extension, the two versions order by which branch accumulated more commits rather than by which is newer — and a squash-merge makes it permanent, because main gains one commit where dev gained five. dev then climbs away from main and a dev install can never cross back. That is Roundtable's 2026-08-24 incident (Scribe #2993) in a different repo: their versionCode was the branch's commit count, and it produced a channel you could enter and not leave. Measured on this repo today the old formula gives main=23, dev=24 — one apart, which is exactly how the inversion stays invisible until it strands somebody. New formula: minutes since 2020-01-01 of the LATEST commit touching a packaged extension file. Same anchor and unit Roundtable settled on. Commit time, not build time, and the difference is load-bearing: - stable while the extension is unchanged, so the ext-<version> signature cache still hits and AMO is called once per extension CHANGE rather than once per push. Build-time minutes would re-sign on every push and never let two channels share a signature. - after a merge, main sees the same commit and derives the same number, so :latest reuses the signature :dev already produced for byte-identical code. Same code, same version, one signing. - monotonic: max() over a set that only gains members. Verified across all 24 extension-touching commits, zero non-monotonic steps. - reproducible from any checkout. Derives 1.0.3499884 on dev, 1.0.3465860 on main — both far above the last hand-set 1.0.11, so milestone 271's backfill guard is satisfied by construction rather than by an offset. Still shadow-only: nothing reads the derived value yet. Both shadow steps log it, and ci.yml's runs on dev too, so both channels' numbers are visible — that is the pair that has to stay ordered. Prior shadow observations describe the OLD formula and prove nothing about this one, so the window restarts; ci.yml says so at the step. New requirement recorded in ci-requirements.md: a depth-1 clone derives a wrong, too-low value rather than failing, so fetch-depth: 0 is load-bearing wherever packaging.sh version is called. Refs #3092, milestone 271	2026-08-27 09:26:58 -04:00
Claude	11dd324f89	fix(extension): exclude the test/ and scripts/ directory entries from the XPI ... The XPI-content check added in 1c6452e did its job on its first run: the archive carried empty `test/` and `scripts/` entries. `test/**` matches the files inside a directory but not the directory entry itself, and web-ext writes an entry for the directory separately -- so the contents were correctly excluded while the empty directories shipped anyway. Nothing harmful reached users (no dev code, just two empty entries), but our single declaration claimed these do not ship and something was shipping. Both forms are now listed per directory. The bare name alone would not do: minimatch's `test` does not match `test/url.spec.js`, so dropping the glob would ship the contents instead. Verified locally: the derived version is unchanged at 1.0.19, confirming the added entries are redundant for the git pathspec and only affect web-ext. Refs #2400 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-03 16:20:54 -04:00
Claude	597b91d29b	refactor(extension): one definition of what ships in the XPI ... Milestone #271 step 1. Groundwork for deriving the extension version from git; no behavior change yet -- nothing consumes `version` so far. "Which files end up in the XPI" was stated in two places and about to become three. Three hand-kept copies of one fact is what allowed #2397, where the publish path could republish a stale XPI because its cache key had no link to the content it stood for. New extension/scripts/packaging.sh holds the single declaration and exposes: ignore web-ext --ignore-files values pathspec :(exclude)extension/... for git version <MAJOR.MINOR from manifest>.<commit count over packaged files> major-minor / patch Consumers now delegate instead of restating it: - extension/package.json -- all four web-ext scripts - .forgejo/workflows/ci.yml -- the extension-version guard's exclusions - (step 4) the rev-list that derives the version scripts/** joins the non-packaged set; the script must not ship to users. Two shell hazards, both load-bearing: The script runs `set -euf`. Its lists are iterated with deliberate word splitting, and without -f the shell ALSO globs them -- invoking `pathspec` from a directory where test/ exists (exactly how ci.yml calls it) would expand `test/**` into the individual spec files and silently stop covering anything added later. A caller's own `set -f` cannot prevent this: the script is a separate sh process and does not inherit it. Callers additionally need their own `set -f` for the substituted RESULT, which is a different expansion. version.spec.js asserts every --ignore-files caller sets it, that the pathspec comes through with `test/**` literal and no .spec.js paths, and that neither consumer has reinstated a hardcoded list -- the easy future regression is "simplifying" by inlining one again. Verified: all five subcommands plus the usage/exit-2 path. Derived version on main (8300029) is 1.0.19, matching dev. Last published is 1.0.10, so the eventual cutover moves strictly upward and needs no offset -- Firefox refuses downgrades. (An earlier note recorded 18; that was measured against a stale origin/main from before the PR #234 merge.) Refs #2398 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-03 15:33:11 -04:00