12 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	6b3ec98fa8	ci: build on a real buildx driver, attestations off (milestone 326 step 1) ... Adds `docker/setup-buildx-action@v3` to build-web, build-ml and build-agent, and sets `provenance: false` / `sbom: false` on all three build-push steps. Two open issues share one root, which is why this is one change: * #3114 — the agent rebuilds a ~6.3 GB CUDA + torch image whenever the runner's local cache is cold, 9m26s against 7s warm. The default `docker` driver cannot export a registry cache at all, so the fix is unavailable until the driver moves. The cache itself is step 2, deliberately not here. * #3190 — build-agent goes red AFTER a successful push, `No such image` from the local daemon. The leading candidate is the docker driver resolving image metadata against a local store a registry-direct push never filled. The attestation flags are the load-bearing part. On the default driver they were no-ops; on the container driver, build-push-action@v5 defaults provenance to TRUE when pushing. Provenance attaches an attestation manifest, that makes the pushed tag a manifest INDEX, and `.Image.Config.Labels` does not resolve through an index — so the `fc.revision` label the reuse check reads off the channel tag would come back `<none>` on every push. Every image would rebuild forever, every lane would stay green, and the only symptom would be the bill. Same failure as #3183, through a different door; note #3127 §4 records the same shape for `platforms:`. Unverified until CI says otherwise: these jobs run INSIDE a container against a mounted docker socket, so the buildkit container is a sibling of the job container rather than a child. That works over a socket mount and has never been tried on this runner. The gate is the SECOND dev push, not this one. The images currently published were built by the old driver, so one `reuse: NOTE ... no readable fc.revision` is expected now; what must not appear is a second one. Scribe #3249. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 18:36:35 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	2e01242381	feat(extension): derive the version as unpadded CalVer (milestone 318 step 8) ... `1.0.<minutes since 2020>` -> `YYYY.M.D.HHMM` UTC, from the commit time of the newest change to a packaged extension file. Same clock and same commit as before; readable instead of opaque, and the same value the rest of the family derives. The hold on this step was two questions about AMO, and Mozilla's own docs answer both: ^(0|[1-9][0-9]{0,8})([.](0|[1-9][0-9]{0,8})){0,3}$ 1. four all-numeric segments -> ACCEPTED ({0,3} more after the first). 2. leading zeros -> REJECTED. A segment is the single digit `0` or starts 1-9, so `08` and `0201` are refused. MDN says it in prose too: "Non-zero numbers must not include a leading zero." So the documented fallback applies, extension only: the same numbers rendered without the family's zero-padding. `2026.08.29.0201` and `2026.8.29.201` are one value in two renderings — rule 148 defines comparison as numeric per segment, under which they are equal — so nothing already published is reordered, and left-padding each segment recovers the family string exactly. HHMM stays one segment because AMO allows at most four. The transition is safe in the other direction too: 2026 > 1, so every CalVer outranks every published 1.0.x. build.yml's downgrade guard confirms it. Also in scope: * MAJOR.MINOR is gone. `cmd_major_minor`, `cmd_patch` and VERSION_EPOCH go with it, the committed version in manifest.json / package.json is now wholly inert, and ci.yml's MAJOR.MINOR-agreement check is retired rather than left running beside a fact that stopped existing (rule 22). * ci.yml's `extension-version` lane now asserts Mozilla's regex verbatim instead of a loose `^[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)*$` — which would have passed the padded shape. It also asserts YYYY.M.D.HHMM, because AMO would accept a regression to `1.0.<minutes>` while that orders below everything signed since. Checking here is the point: AMO 409s on re-signing, so a version it rejects is burned and cannot be reused. * `artifacts.sh version extension` delegates to packaging.sh, so the two cannot answer differently. The direction matches the existing one — artifacts.sh already asks packaging.sh for the extension's path set. #3156 is what makes this commit safe to make: packaging.sh is in web's path set, so the web revision moves with the extension version and build-web rebuilds instead of republishing an image bundling the previous XPI. Scribe #3138. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-29 13:43:30 -04:00
bvandeusen	41f2bec3af	fix(ci): the build pushes one tag; the rest are written registry-side (#3190) ... buildx on this runner pushes the first tag to the registry and then re-pushes the remaining ones through the DOCKER driver, reading them out of a local image store that a registry-direct build never populated: #27 pushing …/fabledcurator:latest DONE 15.8s #28 pushing …/fabledcurator:c-0e15c44 with docker #28 ERROR: tag does not exist: …:c-0e15c44 It is intermittent — build-ml made the identical two-tag push seconds later in the same run and succeeded — and the consequence is worse than the red job suggests. `:latest` had already published, so production was correct while the immutable rollback tag rule 145 requires of every main push simply did not exist. Nothing else would ever have noticed: a missing :c-<sha> has no consumer that fails, so it surfaces at the moment somebody needs to roll back, which is the worst time to learn a rollback target was never written. So the build now pushes exactly one ref — the channel's — and the existing repoint step, which already excluded the source tag and already ran on every reuse, now runs on the build path too and owns every other tag. `imagetools create` is a registry-side manifest copy: no local daemon, nothing that can be absent. This adds no new code path; it puts the build case onto the one that was already proven. Chosen over the alternative of asserting each tag resolves after the build, which would have made the failure loud without making it rarer. The cost, accepted: `imagetools create` wraps its source in an index, so :c-<sha> is an index rather than a plain image and fc.revision does not resolve through it. Nothing reads that label off :c-<sha> — the reuse check only ever inspects the CHANNEL tag — and the index names the same manifest, so a pull is byte-identical. The reuse path already produced :c-<sha> this way; this only makes it uniform. `build_tags` goes with it — the tag list now has exactly one consumer.	2026-08-29 00:38:26 -04:00
bvandeusen	d38585ed94	docs: true up the tag scheme against what the pipeline publishes (318 step 9) ... A doc describing a tag scheme the pipeline stopped using is worse than no doc — it is a confident wrong answer, and #3159 named it as the drift that had just bitten rule 148. build.yml (each edit ×3, once per build job): * The derived-values block claimed three values including a `tag` subcommand that no longer exists, and said "on dev the date tag is computed nowhere else". There are two values and no date tag. * The BASE-IMAGE FRESHNESS paragraph argued from a pin that no longer exists — "a date tag has to keep serving the bytes it served (fabledcurator:2026.7.17 still resolves to July's image)". Milestone 318 removed the argument's premise rather than answering it: with no version tags there is no immutable name a refresh could contradict, and rule 145 already allows a moving tag to be republished. Deleted the argument, kept a line saying why there is nothing to argue about (#3159's phrasing: the workflow becomes obviously correct instead of carefully correct). * The repoint comment said ":c-<sha> and the date pin". There is no date pin. * "its set is too narrow — the direction that serves stale bytes on a pin" now names the failure that actually exists: the reuse check hits and the channel serves a web image bundling the previous XPI (#3156). README gains a "Versions and tags" section — the three tags, why there is no fourth, and the fact that with no registry name carrying it, the instance's own report is the only answer to "which build is this?". Also fixes two stale claims: three workflows (four since release.yml) and "AMO signing runs on main only", which has been false since milestone 271 step 6 signed on both channels. ci-requirements.md was missing milestones 313 and 318 entirely: no artifacts.sh, no label-keyed reuse, no FC_VERSION. Added those, plus the #3156/#3202 membership test (can changing this file change the published bytes — not is it copied in), and corrected packaging.sh's "two consumers" to three now that artifacts.sh reads it. docker-compose.yml needed nothing — it names `:dev` directly and never offered a pin target. Note #3127 and rule 145's relation notes are updated in Scribe.	2026-08-29 00:09:52 -04:00
bvandeusen	a7e626a67a	feat(extension): report the channel beside the version (step 7) ... Closes the half of the ask the signing work didn't: a way to tell a dev build from a main one. FC_CHANNEL is baked into the web image at build time and /api/extension/manifest reports it as its own key, next to version — the popup banner, the toolbar tooltip and the Settings card all name it. Beside the version, never inside it. A `1.0.3499884-dev` suffix is the obvious shortcut and it is the exact failure this design comes from: versionIsNewer parses each dotted segment with parseInt, so a suffixed segment reads as 0, every dev build compares equal to every other, and "no update available" stops being distinguishable from "I cannot read this version". The comparator already degrades rather than discarding (rule 150), which is a reason not to NEED the suffix, not a licence to add one. Two tests hold the line — one backend, asserting version and channel are separate keys; one frontend, asserting the rendered version text stays the bare derived number. Optional on the read side, and absent rather than defaulted. An image built before this field says nothing by not having the key; an image built without a channel now says nothing the same way, so there is one absence to handle instead of a second spelling of "unknown". Every reader drops the label entirely when it is missing and reads exactly as it did before. Reported verbatim rather than validated against {dev, main}: if an image declares something else, showing what it claims helps whoever is debugging more than dropping it would. FC_CHANNEL is declared LAST in the Dockerfile. An ARG invalidates every layer below it, and this is the one value that differs between the dev and main builds of identical source — earlier, and the two channels could never share a cached pip install. A tag push counts as main: a vYY.MM.DD tag is cut from main, so that image is a main-channel artifact wearing an immutable name. No channel switcher, deliberately. background.js:34 already records that Firefox's static update_url cannot apply, because every FC instance is a different host — so the extension asks its configured backend, and the channel IS the instance it points at. Switching is repointing apiUrl and reinstalling from that host. A separate setting would contradict each server build shipping its own extension. This commit touches packaged extension files, so it moves the derived version and will sign a new one via AMO — the first push to exercise the extension-changed path from dev end to end.	2026-08-27 11:47:30 -04:00
bvandeusen	fe48e77821	ci(extension): retire the manual-bump guard, true up the docs (step 5) ... The guard asked whether a packaged extension file changed without the version moving. Since step 4 nobody moves the version by hand, so it was checking a fact that had stopped existing — and it was not merely dead weight: it would have failed the lane on every real extension change, demanding a bump that decides nothing. Removed rather than left running beside the new mechanism (rule 22). What replaces it is thinner and true. The extension-version lane now asserts the derivation resolves on this commit, that the derived value is the plain dotted-numeric shape AMO accepts, and that MAJOR.MINOR agrees between manifest.json and package.json. MAJOR.MINOR is the one part still hand-set, and packaging.sh reads it from manifest.json ALONE, so a divergence ships a version package.json disagrees with. The lane keeps fetch-depth: 0 — checking that the derivation survives a real checkout is half its remaining value. Deliberately not checked there: that the derived value beats what is already signed. That guard belongs in build.yml, where it compares against the real ext-* releases. Comparing against origin/main in a lane would be wrong, because dev legitimately derives a LOWER value whenever main is ahead on the extension, and a lane that fails for being behind is a lane people learn to ignore. packaging.sh is down to two consumers from three. version.spec.js's "ci.yml derives its pathspec" test would have gone red on that, so it is rewritten to assert the property rather than the consumer: no workflow inlines an :(exclude)extension/ literal, across all three. That keeps the #2397 anti-regression value while surviving consumers coming and going. A second test pins build.yml to packaging.sh version and fails if it goes back to grepping the committed value — which is not a style regression but the #3092 bug itself. build.yml joins extension.yml's trigger paths, since the suite now asserts against it. The lockstep test narrows from the whole version string to MAJOR.MINOR. The committed patch numbers are inert now; asserting on them would fail for a difference that changes nothing. Docs. extension/README.md's Release section described extension.yml signing on main and committing the XPI into frontend/public/ — untrue since 2026-05-25, and it told the reader to hand-bump both files, which is now exactly the wrong instruction. Rewritten, with a Versioning section that says plainly that editing the patch number does nothing and why the key is commit time rather than a count. ci-requirements.md drops the third packaging.sh consumer and names every job that needs full history. Root README no longer claims the extension is signed on main only.	2026-08-27 11:29:44 -04:00
bvandeusen	cd5444e3ae	ci(extension): derive the version from commit TIME, not commit count (#3092) ... Rule 149: an artifact's ordering key must be time-derived, never a commit count. packaging.sh's cmd_patch was a count. Why that matters here rather than in the abstract. A count is per-branch: dev and main count different histories of the SAME code. Today only main signs, so nothing has ordered the two against each other and the fault is invisible. The moment dev also publishes an extension, the two versions order by which branch accumulated more commits rather than by which is newer — and a squash-merge makes it permanent, because main gains one commit where dev gained five. dev then climbs away from main and a dev install can never cross back. That is Roundtable's 2026-08-24 incident (Scribe #2993) in a different repo: their versionCode was the branch's commit count, and it produced a channel you could enter and not leave. Measured on this repo today the old formula gives main=23, dev=24 — one apart, which is exactly how the inversion stays invisible until it strands somebody. New formula: minutes since 2020-01-01 of the LATEST commit touching a packaged extension file. Same anchor and unit Roundtable settled on. Commit time, not build time, and the difference is load-bearing: - stable while the extension is unchanged, so the ext-<version> signature cache still hits and AMO is called once per extension CHANGE rather than once per push. Build-time minutes would re-sign on every push and never let two channels share a signature. - after a merge, main sees the same commit and derives the same number, so :latest reuses the signature :dev already produced for byte-identical code. Same code, same version, one signing. - monotonic: max() over a set that only gains members. Verified across all 24 extension-touching commits, zero non-monotonic steps. - reproducible from any checkout. Derives 1.0.3499884 on dev, 1.0.3465860 on main — both far above the last hand-set 1.0.11, so milestone 271's backfill guard is satisfied by construction rather than by an offset. Still shadow-only: nothing reads the derived value yet. Both shadow steps log it, and ci.yml's runs on dev too, so both channels' numbers are visible — that is the pair that has to stay ordered. Prior shadow observations describe the OLD formula and prove nothing about this one, so the window restarts; ci.yml says so at the step. New requirement recorded in ci-requirements.md: a depth-1 clone derives a wrong, too-low value rather than failing, so fetch-depth: 0 is load-bearing wherever packaging.sh version is called. Refs #3092, milestone 271	2026-08-27 09:26:58 -04:00
Claude	1c6452e10e	ci(extension): shadow the derived version + verify real XPI contents ... Milestone #271 steps 2 and 3. Neither changes what gets published. STEP 2 -- shadow mode. build.yml's sign-extension and ci.yml's extension-version guard now log the version that WOULD be derived from git history alongside the hand-maintained one. Nothing reads the derived value, and neither site can fail because of it. This exists because `web-ext sign` is one-shot per version: AMO 409s on a repeat, so a wrong formula burns a real version number that cannot be reclaimed. Comparing the two across real builds is the only way to validate it at zero cost. sign-extension runs on main only, so main pushes are the sole source of truth for whether the derived number moves exactly when the shipped extension changes -- the dev-side log is a convenience, not the evidence. sign-extension now checks out with fetch-depth: 0. The derived version is a commit count and a depth-1 clone cannot produce one. STEP 3 -- XPI content verification. Every other packaging assertion checks our declaration against itself. This is the first that asks web-ext what it ACTUALLY wrote into the archive. That assumption was both unverified and fragile: `test/**` only survives to web-ext because callers `set -f` before substituting it, so losing that quoting would silently start shipping dev files with no other signal. The step builds the XPI and asserts test/, scripts/, vitest.config.js, package.json, package-lock.json, README.md and node_modules are absent -- and, because an over-matching exclusion would break the extension at runtime rather than at build time, that manifest.json, all four lib/*.js and every UI directory are present. unzip is installed only when missing; node:24-bookworm-slim may not carry it. Refs #2399, #2400 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-03 16:15:12 -04:00
Claude	597b91d29b	refactor(extension): one definition of what ships in the XPI ... Milestone #271 step 1. Groundwork for deriving the extension version from git; no behavior change yet -- nothing consumes `version` so far. "Which files end up in the XPI" was stated in two places and about to become three. Three hand-kept copies of one fact is what allowed #2397, where the publish path could republish a stale XPI because its cache key had no link to the content it stood for. New extension/scripts/packaging.sh holds the single declaration and exposes: ignore web-ext --ignore-files values pathspec :(exclude)extension/... for git version <MAJOR.MINOR from manifest>.<commit count over packaged files> major-minor / patch Consumers now delegate instead of restating it: - extension/package.json -- all four web-ext scripts - .forgejo/workflows/ci.yml -- the extension-version guard's exclusions - (step 4) the rev-list that derives the version scripts/** joins the non-packaged set; the script must not ship to users. Two shell hazards, both load-bearing: The script runs `set -euf`. Its lists are iterated with deliberate word splitting, and without -f the shell ALSO globs them -- invoking `pathspec` from a directory where test/ exists (exactly how ci.yml calls it) would expand `test/**` into the individual spec files and silently stop covering anything added later. A caller's own `set -f` cannot prevent this: the script is a separate sh process and does not inherit it. Callers additionally need their own `set -f` for the substituted RESULT, which is a different expansion. version.spec.js asserts every --ignore-files caller sets it, that the pathspec comes through with `test/**` literal and no .spec.js paths, and that neither consumer has reinstated a hardcoded list -- the easy future regression is "simplifying" by inlining one again. Verified: all five subcommands plus the usage/exit-2 path. Derived version on main (8300029) is 1.0.19, matching dev. Last published is 1.0.10, so the eventual cutover moves strictly upward and needs no offset -- Firefox refuses downgrades. (An earlier note recorded 18; that was measured against a stale origin/main from before the PR #234 merge.) Refs #2398 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-03 15:33:11 -04:00
Claude	f9111c06a7	test(extension): unit suite for lib/ + version-consistency specs ... extension/ had no test harness at all -- web-ext lint was the only signal, so the URL-normalization fix in 8214afe shipped with nothing exercising it. Adds vitest (mirroring frontend/vitest.config.js) and three specs: - url.spec.js normalizeApiUrl / webRootFromApiUrl, including the #2393 regression: instance-root input must reach /api/credentials, idempotence, trailing-slash and whitespace handling, and that empty input never yields a bare "/api" (which isConfigured() would read as configured). - platforms.spec.js getPlatformFromUrl / isArtistPage, pinning the #1485 regression -- all three Patreon creator URL shapes (bare, /c/, /cw/) plus inner pages, with nav pages excluded -- and table-integrity checks. - version.spec.js manifest.json and package.json versions in lockstep, AMO-safe version format, and url.js ordered before api.js in background.scripts (classic scripts share one scope, so a reorder is a runtime ReferenceError with no build signal). Specs load lib/*.js by evaluating the real file as a classic script (test/helpers/loadLib.js) instead of adding module.exports shims to production code that would never run in the browser. The suite therefore exercises exactly the bytes packaged into the XPI. Two packaging consequences, both handled: - web-ext would otherwise bundle test/ and vitest.config.js INTO the XPI; both are now in --ignore-files across all four web-ext scripts. - ci.yml's extension-version guard must ignore the same paths, or editing a spec would demand a pointless version bump. The dangerous drift direction is the opposite one -- a guard exclusion for a file that DOES ship would let a real change pass unnoticed -- so version.spec.js asserts every :(exclude) in ci.yml appears in --ignore-files. extension.yml also triggers on ci.yml now, since version.spec.js reads it. Refs #2393, #2397 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-02 23:47:18 -04:00
bvandeusen	306de50f61	docs: Fabled-Git, not Forgejo, in ci-requirements ... The instance has run Gitea since the migration. Also fixes a dead rulebook pointer: the topic was renamed forgejo.md -> fabled-git.md, so the "CI philosophy" reference pointed at a file that no longer exists. Prose only — no workflow or path change. Scribe issue #2272.	2026-07-31 23:42:47 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.7	4a09cca46e	feat(ci): pin container.image to ci-python:3.14 + ship ci-requirements.md ... Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-05-21 09:19:30 -04:00