2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusen	609bc82acc	ci: reuse the published image instead of rebuilding it (milestone 313 step 4) ... Before building, each job asks the registry whether this artifact's content is already published. On a hit it skips the build entirely and repoints the channel and date tags at the existing manifest with `imagetools create` — registry-side, no layer transfer, seconds. This is the step that stops a push touching only `agent/` from rebuilding web and ml, and stops a merge to main rebuilding what dev already built. The question is asked with a new `artifacts.sh identity`, not with the date tag: the date tag is day-precise and last-one-wins, so two different builds share it and it cannot answer "is this content published?". The commit sha would move on every push and never hit, which is the redundant rebuild being removed. The revision does both jobs — content-unique, and stable across pushes that did not touch the artifact. Identity is channel-qualified for web and only for web, because web is the only image that takes a build-arg: FC_CHANNEL is baked in and reported by /api/extension/manifest, so its dev and main builds of one revision are genuinely different images. ml and agent take none, which is what lets a merge reuse dev's build rather than rebuilding the agent's CUDA image to produce bytes that already exist. tests/test_artifact_identity.py reads the Dockerfiles and fails if that list drifts from the ARG declarations, in either direction — collapsing the channels ships an instance that reports the wrong one, and splitting them needlessly rebuilds every merge. Failure direction is deliberate: an inspect that errors for any reason reads as a miss and the build runs. Only a real 200 skips one. A tag-push never claims the identity. It rebuilds a revision main already published, and image configs are not bit-reproducible, so re-pushing r-<rev> would point an immutable tag at fresh bytes — rule 145's exact prohibition. It publishes only its own :v... label and otherwise reuses. Base-image freshness, decided rather than left implicit: an artifact whose source stops moving stops picking up base updates under its pinned tag. That is what a pin means, and rule 145 already says the refresh belongs on the moving tag instead. Filed as #3154 rather than folded in here, because the naive version regresses :latest on the next unrelated push. ci.yml's backend lane gains fetch-depth: 0 — the new tests derive real revisions, and on a depth-1 clone that derivation returns the tip sha or fails, so the lane would go green while asserting nothing. The three build jobs' shadow steps are renamed and re-commented: those values stopped being informational at step 3, and a step captioned "nothing reads this" beside steps that do is worse than no caption.	2026-08-28 08:24:58 -04:00
bvandeusen	cf06c81db9	build: one definition per artifact of what it ships (milestone 313 step 1) ... scripts/artifacts.sh generalises what packaging.sh established for the extension: four published artifacts, four path sets, four independent versions derived from the newest commit touching each set. Measured on this commit, and this is the point of the whole thing: web tag=2026.8.27 version=2026.8.27.1547 rev=a7e626a ml tag=2026.8.27 version=2026.8.27.1547 rev=a7e626a agent tag=2026.7.17 version=2026.7.17.1657 rev=57e5243 extension tag=2026.8.27 version=2026.8.27.1547 rev=a7e626a The agent is six weeks behind because agent/fc_agent has not changed since 57e5243. Today it rebuilds and re-tags on every push regardless; from step 4 it will not. Three outputs, because they answer different questions and conflating them is how this goes wrong: tag YYYY.M.D the published image tag. Day precision, per the operator: same-day work is not worth pinning, so a second build that day replaces the first. version YYYY.M.D.HHMM the ordering key. The extension needs this and cannot use `tag`: Firefox compares it to decide whether an update exists, so two same-day builds must be distinguishable or the second hits the ext-<version> cache and ships stale bytes. That is issue #2397's failure mode exactly. revision <sha> content identity. Because `tag` is only day-precise, "does this tag already exist" cannot decide whether a build can be skipped — two different builds legitimately share a tag. Step 4 keys on this instead. Path sets read from the Dockerfiles rather than guessed. Notable calls: - web includes the extension's packaged set, because build.yml bakes the signed XPI into frontend/public/extension/ before the docker build. Miss that and :latest serves a NEW extension under an unchanged web version. - web excludes frontend/test: vite builds from src/, index.html and public/, so a spec change lands in the builder layer but never in dist. - agent is agent/Dockerfile + agent/requirements.txt + agent/fc_agent, NOT agent/. README.md, ruff.toml and docker-compose.yml sit in that directory and never reach the image. - every set includes its own Dockerfile and requirements: a base-image bump changes the artifact as surely as a source edit does. - the extension's set is read from packaging.sh, not restated. One definition, per #2397. tests/test_artifact_paths.py guards both directions of being wrong, since both are silent. Too narrow — a COPY'd file missing from the set — means the version does not move when the content does, and a pin serves stale bytes. Too wide means re-versioning for a change the artifact does not ship. The test parses each Dockerfile's COPY lines and compares them against the declaration, so adding a COPY without updating the set fails the lane. No workflow reads any of this yet. Step 2 shadows it.	2026-08-27 21:36:17 -04:00