Commit Graph
11 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 3590c478f5 docs+ci: folder import stays retired, and fix a readiness probe that never probed
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 13s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 7s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 22s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 29s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 49s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 1m57s
extension / lint (pull_request) Successful in 22s
Two unrelated things, both found while closing out milestone 328.

**Folder import (#3367).** The operator's call, this session: the
import-from-file surface was abandoned on purpose and is not coming back —
"it has its own complexities that we didn't need." The README and the
compose comment both described the missing button as a rough edge with a
tracking issue, which promised a fix that is not coming. Both now say the
retirement is the decision, name Subscriptions as the supported way to fill
a new install, and describe /api/import/trigger as an unsupported escape
hatch for anyone who wants to script one.

**The CI readiness probe.** ci.yml's integration job and baseline.yml both
waited for Postgres with `(echo > /dev/tcp/$PG_IP/5432)`. Those steps run
under `sh -e` — act's default shell — where /dev/tcp is not a magic path but
a filename that does not exist. The probe could therefore never succeed: run
18035, a GREEN run, spends 05:20:53 → 05:22:53 in that loop and exits it by
exhaustion, not by connecting. Every integration run has been paying a flat
120s for a check that established nothing, and proceeding regardless.

Replaced with a socket connect in python (present in the image, no package
needed), and exhausting the budget is now a named failure instead of a
silent fall-through — rule 156.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA
2026-09-02 00:51:25 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 8a4af589f1 docs: write the install path for someone who is not the operator (#3271)
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 9s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 29s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 23s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 30s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m42s
FC has no login — no User model, no session auth, nothing. That was a
deliberate call for a single-operator tool and it stays (operator, this
session), but it was nowhere in the docs, and the app stores live Patreon /
SubscribeStar / Pixiv session cookies on accounts that carry a payment
method. Anyone standing this up from the README could reasonably have put it
behind a TLS-terminating proxy and considered it handled.

So the no-auth posture is now stated three times, in the three places someone
decides where to bind the port: README has a "Before you expose it" section
above the install instructions, .env.example explains why there is no auth
variable in it, and the compose header says it before the first service.

SECURITY.md claimed the opposite. It listed "a multi-user sharing ACL —
instances can be shared" among the things worth protecting; there are no
accounts to share between. That was rule 47 applied to a codebase that does
not implement it, and it would have told a researcher FC holds a boundary it
does not. Replaced with the real posture, including that TLS without an
authenticating layer in front changes nothing.

Also corrected, all of it stale rather than wrong-at-the-time:

- EXTENSION_API_KEY was dead config. config.py read it into a field nothing
  consumed; the real key is generated into app_setting on first use and
  managed in the UI. Removed from config.py, compose and .env.example.
- .env.example pointed at docs/superpowers/specs/… — there is no docs/ dir —
  and described the extension key as "lands in FC-3", closed 2026-05-21.
- The /import mount comment described an FC-5 ImageRepo migration run from
  "Settings → Maintenance → Legacy migration", a surface with no frontend.
- README said the extension installs from Settings → Maintenance. It is on
  Subscriptions → Settings.

README is now split: running FC above the line, developing FC below it, with
requirements, first run, the extension, upgrading and troubleshooting on the
running side. First run documents the one real gap it found — a new installer
with a library on disk has no button to import it, only POST
/api/import/trigger, because the manual-scan UI was retired 2026-07-02 when
that stopped mattering for an established install. Filed as #3367.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017QHszn9H8VBvx5Ke8x1hvw
2026-09-02 00:16:23 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 bc4eba636d fix: the documented install path pulled :dev, not :latest (#3270)
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 9s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 7s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 21s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 31s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m44s
docker-compose.yml pinned :dev on all five app services — web, worker,
scheduler, maintenance-long, ml-worker. The README documents
`docker compose -f docker-compose.yml up -d` as the production path, and
-f means "use only this file", skipping the override and its build:
directives. So Compose pulled image:, and image: was the rolling
development channel. The documented way to install this product shipped
development builds.

It went unnoticed for a structural reason rather than a careless one:
nobody who works on the project takes that path. The operator deploys
from a swarm stack file; contributors get docker-compose.override.yml,
which sets build: for all five services, and build: wins over image:. The
broken path is reachable only by a stranger following the README — which
is exactly the audience that did not exist until now.

:latest, per rule 147: main IS production. It is also what the agent
stack (agent/docker-compose.yml) already pinned, so this makes the two
stacks agree rather than introducing a new convention.

Both paths verified with `docker compose config`, which merges and prints
without starting anything:

  dev path        — build: present on all five, image: not pulled
  -f production   — 0 build: directives, five :latest images resolved

Also checked the base file for anything a stranger could not satisfy:
no host-absolute volume paths, no operator-specific port bindings, no
device mappings. The tag was the only defect in the consumer path.

The comment on web.image is deliberately long (rule 32). A line reading
:latest inside a file a developer is debugging with is exactly the line
someone flips back to :dev to test something and then commits, and the
consequence — strangers silently installing bleeding edge — is invisible
to everyone who works here.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017QHszn9H8VBvx5Ke8x1hvw
2026-08-31 16:55:43 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 dbc4e8b0c6 docs: AGPL-3.0, plus SECURITY and CONTRIBUTING (#3269)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m52s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 8s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 7s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 31s
The repo had no LICENSE, which meant all rights reserved by default:
nobody could legally run or modify it, and "public availability" was a
contradiction no amount of install documentation could fix. This is the
hard blocker in milestone 328; everything else in it is quality.

AGPL-3.0, at the operator's explicit choice, for the reason the operator
gave: this should not become something another party runs as a hosted
proprietary service. Section 13 is what makes it fit — for a self-hosted
web app, distribution otherwise never happens, so the GPL's obligation
would never actually bite. AGPL reaches the case that matters here:
running a MODIFIED copy as a service for others.

LICENSE is the FSF text fetched from gnu.org and verified byte-identical
(34,523 bytes, 661 lines, §13 "Remote Network Interaction" present), not
retyped. README's old "Personal project; use at your own discretion" said
nothing legally and is replaced with what the licence actually asks —
including the part worth being clear about, that running an unmodified
copy for yourself carries no obligation whatsoever.

SECURITY.md names what this software actually holds, because that is what
makes a report serious here: live third-party session cookies for
accounts with payment methods attached, the extension API key, the
multi-user sharing ACL, and arbitrary downloaded media that gets decoded
and fed to models. It also states the plain-HTTP posture up front, so
"served over HTTP" and "no HSTS" are understood as the documented design
rather than filed as findings.

There is no private disclosure channel yet, so the reporting instruction
is to open an issue containing NOTHING but the fact that a report exists,
and wait for a private contact. Awkward on purpose: an issue tracker is
public the moment it is written to, and every self-hosted instance stays
vulnerable until its operator can update. Worth replacing with a real
contact address — that decision is the operator's, since it publishes one.

CONTRIBUTING records the two things that actually catch people: ruff's
order-by-type import sorting, and that a model change and its migration
belong in the same commit. The second is not style — the models and the
chain silently diverged for a long time (#3275) and autogenerate was
unsafe as a result.

Pre-publication scan, since the repo is about to get attention:
.env.example is placeholders only (`changeme_*`), `.env` is gitignored
with an `!.env.example` exception, no credential-shaped literals are
committed, and there are no private IPs or operator home paths. The only
hostnames are the project's own forge, which is public by design.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017QHszn9H8VBvx5Ke8x1hvw
2026-08-31 14:53:06 -04:00
bvandeusen d38585ed94 docs: true up the tag scheme against what the pipeline publishes (318 step 9)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 5s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 22s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 30s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 48s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m57s
extension / lint (pull_request) Successful in 28s
A doc describing a tag scheme the pipeline stopped using is worse than no
doc — it is a confident wrong answer, and #3159 named it as the drift that
had just bitten rule 148.

build.yml (each edit ×3, once per build job):

* The derived-values block claimed three values including a `tag`
  subcommand that no longer exists, and said "on dev the date tag is
  computed nowhere else". There are two values and no date tag.
* The BASE-IMAGE FRESHNESS paragraph argued from a pin that no longer
  exists — "a date tag has to keep serving the bytes it served
  (fabledcurator:2026.7.17 still resolves to July's image)". Milestone 318
  removed the argument's premise rather than answering it: with no version
  tags there is no immutable name a refresh could contradict, and rule 145
  already allows a moving tag to be republished. Deleted the argument,
  kept a line saying why there is nothing to argue about (#3159's phrasing:
  the workflow becomes obviously correct instead of carefully correct).
* The repoint comment said ":c-<sha> and the date pin". There is no date pin.
* "its set is too narrow — the direction that serves stale bytes on a pin"
  now names the failure that actually exists: the reuse check hits and the
  channel serves a web image bundling the previous XPI (#3156).

README gains a "Versions and tags" section — the three tags, why there is
no fourth, and the fact that with no registry name carrying it, the
instance's own report is the only answer to "which build is this?". Also
fixes two stale claims: three workflows (four since release.yml) and "AMO
signing runs on main only", which has been false since milestone 271
step 6 signed on both channels.

ci-requirements.md was missing milestones 313 and 318 entirely: no
artifacts.sh, no label-keyed reuse, no FC_VERSION. Added those, plus the
#3156/#3202 membership test (can changing this file change the published
bytes — not is it copied in), and corrected packaging.sh's "two consumers"
to three now that artifacts.sh reads it.

docker-compose.yml needed nothing — it names `:dev` directly and never
offered a pin target.

Note #3127 and rule 145's relation notes are updated in Scribe.
2026-08-29 00:09:52 -04:00
bvandeusen fe48e77821 ci(extension): retire the manual-bump guard, true up the docs (step 5)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 8s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 22s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 25s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 29s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 1m57s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 2m38s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m50s
The guard asked whether a packaged extension file changed without the
version moving. Since step 4 nobody moves the version by hand, so it was
checking a fact that had stopped existing — and it was not merely dead
weight: it would have failed the lane on every real extension change,
demanding a bump that decides nothing. Removed rather than left running
beside the new mechanism (rule 22).

What replaces it is thinner and true. The extension-version lane now
asserts the derivation resolves on this commit, that the derived value is
the plain dotted-numeric shape AMO accepts, and that MAJOR.MINOR agrees
between manifest.json and package.json. MAJOR.MINOR is the one part still
hand-set, and packaging.sh reads it from manifest.json ALONE, so a
divergence ships a version package.json disagrees with. The lane keeps
fetch-depth: 0 — checking that the derivation survives a real checkout is
half its remaining value.

Deliberately not checked there: that the derived value beats what is
already signed. That guard belongs in build.yml, where it compares against
the real ext-* releases. Comparing against origin/main in a lane would be
wrong, because dev legitimately derives a LOWER value whenever main is
ahead on the extension, and a lane that fails for being behind is a lane
people learn to ignore.

packaging.sh is down to two consumers from three. version.spec.js's
"ci.yml derives its pathspec" test would have gone red on that, so it is
rewritten to assert the property rather than the consumer: no workflow
inlines an :(exclude)extension/ literal, across all three. That keeps the
#2397 anti-regression value while surviving consumers coming and going.
A second test pins build.yml to packaging.sh version and fails if it goes
back to grepping the committed value — which is not a style regression but
the #3092 bug itself. build.yml joins extension.yml's trigger paths, since
the suite now asserts against it.

The lockstep test narrows from the whole version string to MAJOR.MINOR.
The committed patch numbers are inert now; asserting on them would fail
for a difference that changes nothing.

Docs. extension/README.md's Release section described extension.yml
signing on main and committing the XPI into frontend/public/ — untrue
since 2026-05-25, and it told the reader to hand-bump both files, which is
now exactly the wrong instruction. Rewritten, with a Versioning section
that says plainly that editing the patch number does nothing and why the
key is commit time rather than a count. ci-requirements.md drops the third
packaging.sh consumer and names every job that needs full history. Root
README no longer claims the extension is signed on main only.
2026-08-27 11:29:44 -04:00
bvandeusen bfc5135f19 docs: true up README — status, the five pieces, CI (#3070)
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 25s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 28s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 5m0s
README.md was last touched in 4aff9c5 (2026-05-14) and several of its
most visible lines had gone false:

- "Pre-v1. Not yet functional." — FC has been continuously deployed for
  months. Replaced with what main/dev actually mean for what's running.
- "Node 22 pre-installed" — ci-requirements.md and extension.yml both say
  node 24, and frontend/package.json requires >=24.
- "Runner label python-ci — a runner with Python 3.14, ruff and Node 22
  pre-installed ... The runner image (runner-base:python-ci) is built
  from CI-Runner/CI-python/" — describes runs-on as selecting the
  toolchain. It doesn't: runs-on is a scheduling label, and every job
  names its own container.image (ci-python:3.14, or node:24-bookworm-slim
  for the extension lane).
- "Both ci.yml and build.yml use this label" — there are three workflows.

The CI section now points at ci-requirements.md rather than restating
it, so the two can't drift apart again; that file is current and is the
one the CI-runner process expects.

Added a "What's in here" table for the five deployable pieces — the
extension, the GPU agent and the ML image were unmentioned, three of the
five. Also corrected the RELEASE_TOKEN write:release scope, which is no
longer "for future release-cutting workflows": it backs the ext-<version>
releases that cache the signed XPI.

Refs #3070
2026-08-27 07:39:49 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.7 4aff9c557d chore: docker compose ergonomics — rename dev override, bake dev defaults
- Renamed docker-compose.dev.yml → docker-compose.override.yml so Docker
  Compose auto-merges it. `docker compose up` (no -f) now Just Works for
  local development.

- Removed the `env_file: .env` requirement from every service in the base
  file. Operators no longer need to create a .env to bring the stack up.

- Baked sane dev defaults directly into docker-compose.yml via
  ${VAR:-default} interpolation:
    DB_USER=fabledcurator
    DB_PASSWORD=fabledcurator_dev
    DB_NAME=fabledcurator
    SECRET_KEY=dev_secret_key_not_for_production_change_me
    LOG_LEVEL=INFO (overridden to DEBUG by the dev override)

  Defaults are insecure but explicitly named so. For production, override
  via shell env vars or a .env file at the project root.

- README quick-start simplified to a single `docker compose up -d`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-14 18:27:25 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.7 ff122c55eb ci: switch runner label from fabledcurator-ci to python-ci
Generic python-ci runner is reusable across the family (FabledScribe,
FabledSteward, NhenArchiver, StashHandler, etc.) rather than scoped to
just this project. Runner image lives at CI-Runner/CI-python/ in the
operator's workspace; pattern mirrors CI-Runner/CI-go and CI-Runner/CI-flutter.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-14 08:45:48 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.7 edb3fafd4d ci: add image-build workflow + document required runner label and RELEASE_TOKEN
Pushes :dev on every dev push; pushes :main and :latest on main.
Uses RELEASE_TOKEN (a broader-scoped Forgejo PAT covering write:package,
read:package, write:release, write:issue) so the same secret can serve
future release-cutting and issue-management workflows.

README now documents the fabledcurator-ci runner label and the required
RELEASE_TOKEN scopes.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-14 07:52:55 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.7 06f8f834dc chore: initialize repo with comprehensive .gitignore and README skeleton
Establishes the FabledRulebook-required ignore patterns (docs/superpowers/specs,
docs/superpowers/plans) plus Python/Node/Vite/extension/volumes/IDE rules from
spec §6.1 before any other code lands, so accidental adds can't leak. Also
ignores .claude/settings.local.json (per-user local overrides; shared
.claude/settings.json may be committed in the future).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-14 07:25:59 -04:00